Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Controlled decomposition strategy for complex spatial objects

  • Advanced Database and Information Systems Methods 2
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1134))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The efficient query processing for complex spatial objects is one of most challenging requirements in many non-traditional applications such as geographic information systems, computer-aided design and multimedia databases. The performance of spatial query processing can be improved by decomposing a complex object into a small number of simple components. This paper investigates a natural trade-off between the number and the complexity of decomposed components. In particular, we propose a new object decomposition method which can control the number of components using a parameter. The proposed method is able to finetune the trade-off by controlling the parameter. An optimal value of the parameter is explored through experimental measurements. The decomposition method with this optimal value outperforms traditional decomposition methods. The gain by applying the optimal value is more clear as the complexity of spatial objects increases.

This work was supported by the National Geographic Information Systems Technology Development of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. O. Guenther, A. Buchmann, “Research Issues in Spatial Databases,” ACM SIG-SIGMOD RECORD, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1990, pp. 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. C. Ooi, Efficient Query Processing in Geographic Information Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 471, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. H. Güting, “An Introduction to Spatial Database Systems,” VLDB Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1994, pp. 357–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Brinkhoff, H. P. Kriegel, and R. Schneider, “Comparison of Approximations of Complex Objects Used for Approximation-based Query Processing in Spatial Database Systems,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, Vienna, Austria, 1993, pp. 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. P. Kriegel, H. Horn, and M. Schiwietz, “The Performance of Object Decomposition Techniques for Spatial Query Processing,” Proc. of 2nd Symp. on Large Spatial Databases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 525, Springer-Verlag, 1991, pp. 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. A. Orenstein, “Redundancy in Spatial Databases,” Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, 1989, pp. 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. A. Orestein, “Spatial Query Processing in An Object-oriented Database System, ” Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, 1986, pp. 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Faloutsos, W. Rego, “Tri-Cell: A Data Structure for Spatial Objects,” Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1989, pp. 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Preparata, M. Shamos, Computational Geometry: An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Guttman, “R-trees: A Dynamic Index Structure for Spatial Searching,” Proc. ACM SIGMOD, 1984, pp. 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Sellis, N. Roussopoulos, and C. Faloutsos, “The R+-tree: A Dynamic Index for Multi-dimensional Objects,” Proc. 13th Very Large Data Bases, Conf. Sep. 1987, pp. 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Beckmann, H. P, Kriegel, R. Schneider, and B. Seeger, “The R*-tree: An Efficient and Robust Access Method for Points and Rectangles,” in Proc. ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Atlantic City, USA, 1990, pp. 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Samet, The design and Analysis of Spatial Data Structures, Addison-Wesley Pub., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Samet, “Hierarchical Saptial Data Structures,” Proc. of 1st Symp. on Large Spatial Databases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 409, Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp. 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. Gunther, “The Design of the Cell tree: An Object-oriented Index Structure for Geometric Databases,” Proc. Data Engineering Conference, 1989, pp. 598–605.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Schneider, H.P. Kriegel, “The TR*-tree: A New Representation of Polygonal Objects Supporting Spatial Queries and Operations,” Proc. 7th Workshop on Computational Geometry, Bern, Switzerland, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 553, Springer-Verlag, 1991, pp. 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Henrich, H. W. Six, and P. Widmayer, “The LSD Tree: Spatial Access to Multidimensional Point and Non-point Objects,” Proc. 15th Very Large Date Bases Conf., Amsterdam, Aug. 1989, pp. 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Roland R. Wagner Helmut Thoma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, YJ., Lee, DM., Ryu, SJ., Chung, CW. (1996). Controlled decomposition strategy for complex spatial objects. In: Wagner, R.R., Thoma, H. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1134. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034682

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034682

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61656-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70651-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics