Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Renormalization group effects in dark matter interactions

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 March 2020
  • Volume 2020, article number 89, (2020)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Renormalization group effects in dark matter interactions
Download PDF
  • Fady Bishara  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-77761,
  • Joachim Brod2,
  • Benjamin Grinstein3 &
  • …
  • Jure Zupan2 

  • 370 Accesses

  • 16 Citations

  • 4 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We present a renormalization-group (RG) analysis of dark matter interactions with the standard model, where dark matter is allowed to be a component of an electroweak multiplet, and has a mass at or below the electroweak scale. We consider, in addition to the gauge interactions, the complete set of effective operators for dark matter interactions with the standard model above the weak scale, up to and including mass dimension six. We calculate the RG evolution of these operators from the high scale Λ down to the weak scale, and perform the matching to the tower of effective theories below the weak scale. We also summarize the RG evolution below the weak scale and the matching to the nonrelativistic nuclear interactions. We present several numerical examples and show that in certain cases the dark matter — nucleus scattering rate can change by orders of magnitude when the electroweak running is included.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Strong gravitational radiation from a simple dark matter model

Article Open access 28 May 2019

Heavy dark matter through the dilaton portal

Article Open access 07 October 2020

Systematizing the effective theory of self-interacting dark matter

Article Open access 28 October 2020
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. J. Bagnasco, M. Dine and S.D. Thomas, Detecting technibaryon dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 320 (1994) 99 [hep-ph/9310290] [INSPIRE].

  2. M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, Direct and indirect limits on the electromagnetic form-factors of WIMPs, Phys. Lett. B 480 (2000) 181 [hep-ph/0003010] [INSPIRE].

  3. A. Kurylov and M. Kamionkowski, Generalized analysis of weakly interacting massive particle searches, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 063503 [hep-ph/0307185] [INSPIRE].

  4. J. Kopp, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Global interpretation of direct Dark Matter searches after CDMS-II results, JCAP 02 (2010) 014 [arXiv:0912.4264] [INSPIRE].

  5. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 11 (2010) 042 [arXiv:1008.1591] [INSPIRE].

  6. V. Cirigliano, M.L. Graesser and G. Ovanesyan, WIMP-nucleus scattering in chiral effective theory, JHEP 10 (2012) 025 [arXiv:1205.2695] [INSPIRE].

  7. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Universal behavior in the scattering of heavy, weakly interacting dark matter on nuclear targets, Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 539 [arXiv:1111.0016] [INSPIRE].

  8. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, WIMP-nucleon scattering with heavy WIMP effective theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 211602 [arXiv:1309.4092] [INSPIRE].

  9. A.L. Fitzpatrick et al., The effective field theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 02 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1203.3542] [INSPIRE].

  10. A.L. Fitzpatrick et al., Model independent direct detection analyses, arXiv:1211.2818 [INSPIRE].

  11. J. Menendez, D. Gazit and A. Schwenk, Spin-dependent WIMP scattering off nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 103511 [arXiv:1208.1094] [INSPIRE].

  12. N. Anand, A.L. Fitzpatrick and W.C. Haxton, Weakly interacting massive particle-nucleus elastic scattering response, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 065501 [arXiv:1308.6288] [INSPIRE].

  13. P. Klos, J. Menéndez, D. Gazit and A. Schwenk, Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083516 [Erratum ibid. D 89 (2014) 029901] [arXiv:1304.7684] [INSPIRE].

  14. M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile and P. Panci, Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches, JCAP 10 (2013) 019 [arXiv:1307.5955] [INSPIRE].

  15. G. Barello, S. Chang and C.A. Newby, A model independent approach to inelastic dark matter scattering, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 094027 [arXiv:1409.0536] [INSPIRE].

  16. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Standard Model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection II: QCD analysis and hadronic matrix elements, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 043505 [arXiv:1409.8290] [INSPIRE].

  17. R. Catena and P. Gondolo, Global fits of the dark matter-nucleon effective interactions, JCAP 09 (2014) 045 [arXiv:1405.2637] [INSPIRE].

  18. M. Hoferichter, P. Klos and A. Schwenk, Chiral power counting of one- and two-body currents in direct detection of dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 410 [arXiv:1503.04811] [INSPIRE].

  19. M. Hoferichter, P. Klos, J. Menéndez and A. Schwenk, Analysis strategies for general spin-independent WIMP-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 063505 [arXiv:1605.08043] [INSPIRE].

  20. F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein and J. Zupan, Chiral effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 02 (2017) 009 [arXiv:1611.00368] [INSPIRE].

  21. F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein and J. Zupan, From quarks to nucleons in dark matter direct detection, JHEP 11 (2017) 059 [arXiv:1707.06998] [INSPIRE].

  22. F. D’Eramo, B.J. Kavanagh and P. Panci, You can hide but you have to run: direct detection with vector mediators, JHEP 08 (2016) 111 [arXiv:1605.04917] [INSPIRE].

  23. F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein and J. Zupan, DirectDM: a tool for dark matter direct detection, arXiv:1708.02678 [INSPIRE].

  24. F. D’Eramo, B.J. Kavanagh and P. Panci, Probing leptophilic dark sectors with hadronic processes, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 339 [arXiv:1702.00016] [INSPIRE].

  25. J. Brod, B. Grinstein, E. Stamou and J. Zupan, Weak mixing below the weak scale in dark-matter direct detection, JHEP 02 (2018) 174 [arXiv:1801.04240] [INSPIRE].

  26. J. Brod, A. Gootjes-Dreesbach, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan, Effective field theory for dark matter direct detection up to dimension seven, JHEP 10 (2018) 065 [arXiv:1710.10218] [INSPIRE].

  27. C.-Y. Chen, R.J. Hill, M.P. Solon and A.M. Wijangco, Power corrections to the universal heavy WIMP-nucleon cross section, Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018) 473 [arXiv:1801.08551] [INSPIRE].

  28. J. Kumar and D. Marfatia, Matrix element analyses of dark matter scattering and annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 014035 [arXiv:1305.1611] [INSPIRE].

  29. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C.S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective dark matter model: relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC, JHEP 08 (2011) 018 [arXiv:0912.4511] [INSPIRE].

  30. J. Goodman et al., Gamma ray line constraints on effective theories of dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 844 (2011) 55 [arXiv:1009.0008] [INSPIRE].

  31. P. Ciafaloni et al., On the importance of electroweak corrections for Majorana dark matter indirect detection, JCAP 06 (2011) 018 [arXiv:1104.2996] [INSPIRE].

  32. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng and T.-C. Yuan, Gamma-ray constraints on effective interactions of the dark matter, JCAP 06 (2011) 023 [arXiv:1104.5329] [INSPIRE].

  33. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.-C. Yuan, Global constraints on effective dark matter interactions: relic density, direct detection, indirect detection and collider, JCAP 05 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1201.3402] [INSPIRE].

  34. L. Vietze et al., Nuclear structure aspects of spin-independent WIMP scattering off xenon, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 043520 [arXiv:1412.6091] [INSPIRE].

  35. U. Haisch and E. Re, Simplified dark matter top-quark interactions at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2015) 078 [arXiv:1503.00691] [INSPIRE].

  36. R.C. Cotta, J.L. Hewett, M.P. Le and T.G. Rizzo, Bounds on dark matter interactions with electroweak gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 116009 [arXiv:1210.0525] [INSPIRE].

  37. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 412 [arXiv:1307.2253] [INSPIRE].

  38. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, LEP shines light on dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 014028 [arXiv:1103.0240] [INSPIRE].

  39. A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC bounds on interactions of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095013 [arXiv:1108.1196] [INSPIRE].

  40. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [INSPIRE].

  41. D. Racco, A. Wulzer and F. Zwirner, Robust collider limits on heavy-mediator dark matter, JHEP 05 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1502.04701] [INSPIRE].

  42. T. Jacques and K. Nordström, Mapping monojet constraints onto simplified dark matter models, JHEP 06 (2015) 142 [arXiv:1502.05721] [INSPIRE].

  43. M. Bauer et al., Validity of dark matter effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 075036 [arXiv:1611.09908] [INSPIRE].

  44. A. Albert et al., Towards the next generation of simplified Dark Matter models, Phys. Dark Univ. 16 (2017) 49 [arXiv:1607.06680] [INSPIRE].

  45. J. Abdallah et al., Simplified models for dark matter searches at the LHC, Phys. Dark Univ. 9-10 (2015) 8 [arXiv:1506.03116] [INSPIRE].

  46. S. Bruggisser, F. Riva and A. Urbano, The last gasp of dark matter effective theory, JHEP 11 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1607.02475] [INSPIRE].

  47. A. De Simone and T. Jacques, Simplified models vs. effective field theory approaches in dark matter searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 367 [arXiv:1603.08002] [INSPIRE].

  48. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz and S. Vogl, Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models, JHEP 02 (2016) 016 [arXiv:1510.02110] [INSPIRE].

  49. G. Busoni et al., Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplified s-channel models of dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 27 (2020) 100365 [arXiv:1603.04156] [INSPIRE].

  50. D. Goncalves, P.A.N. Machado and J.M. No, Simplified models for dark matter face their consistent completions, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055027 [arXiv:1611.04593] [INSPIRE].

  51. N.F. Bell, G. Busoni and I.W. Sanderson, Self-consistent dark matter simplified models with an s-channel scalar mediator, JCAP 03 (2017) 015 [arXiv:1612.03475] [INSPIRE].

  52. M. Duerr et al., How to save the WIMP: global analysis of a dark matter model with two s-channel mediators, JHEP 09 (2016) 042 [arXiv:1606.07609] [INSPIRE].

  53. C. Englert, M. McCullough and M. Spannowsky, S-channel dark matter simplified models and unitarity, Phys. Dark Univ. 14 (2016) 48 [arXiv:1604.07975] [INSPIRE].

  54. A.J. Brennan, M.F. McDonald, J. Gramling and T.D. Jacques, Collide and conquer: constraints on simplified dark matter models using Mono-X collider searches, JHEP 05 (2016) 112 [arXiv:1603.01366] [INSPIRE].

  55. T. Alanne and F. Goertz, Extended dark matter EFT, arXiv:1712.07626 [INSPIRE].

  56. G. Bertone et al., Identifying WIMP dark matter from particle and astroparticle data, JCAP 03 (2018) 026 [arXiv:1712.04793] [INSPIRE].

  57. E. Bernreuther, J. Horak, T. Plehn and A. Butter, Actual physics behind Mono-X, SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 034 [arXiv:1805.11637] [INSPIRE].

  58. D. Gazda, R. Catena and C. Forsśen, Ab initio nuclear response functions for dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 103011 [arXiv:1612.09165] [INSPIRE].

  59. C. Körber, A. Nogga and J. de Vries, First-principle calculations of Dark Matter scattering off light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 035805 [arXiv:1704.01150] [INSPIRE].

  60. A. Crivellin, F. D’Eramo and M. Procura, New constraints on dark matter effective theories from standard model loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 191304 [arXiv:1402.1173] [INSPIRE].

  61. F. D’Eramo and M. Procura, Connecting dark matter UV complete models to direct detection rates via effective field theory, JHEP 04 (2015) 054 [arXiv:1411.3342] [INSPIRE].

  62. A. Crivellin, U. Haisch and A. Hibbs, LHC constraints on gauge boson couplings to dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 074028 [arXiv:1501.00907] [INSPIRE].

  63. U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer and E. Re, QCD effects in mono-jet searches for dark matter, JHEP 12 (2013) 007 [arXiv:1310.4491] [INSPIRE].

  64. U. Haisch and F. Kahlhoefer, On the importance of loop-induced spin-independent interactions for dark matter direct detection, JCAP 04 (2013) 050 [arXiv:1302.4454] [INSPIRE].

  65. U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer and J. Unwin, The impact of heavy-quark loops on LHC dark matter searches, JHEP 07 (2013) 125 [arXiv:1208.4605] [INSPIRE].

  66. M.T. Frandsen et al., Loop-induced dark matter direct detection signals from gamma-ray lines, JCAP 10 (2012) 033 [arXiv:1207.3971] [INSPIRE].

  67. M. Freytsis and Z. Ligeti, On dark matter models with uniquely spin-dependent detection possibilities, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 115009 [arXiv:1012.5317] [INSPIRE].

  68. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata and T. Takesako, Direct detection of electroweak-interacting dark matter, JHEP 07 (2011) 005 [arXiv:1104.0228] [INSPIRE].

  69. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Gluon contribution to the dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115007 [arXiv:1007.2601] [INSPIRE].

  70. M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 178 [hep-ph/0512090] [INSPIRE].

  71. Y. Bai and J. Osborne, Chromo-Rayleigh interactions of dark matter, JHEP 11 (2015) 036 [arXiv:1506.07110] [INSPIRE].

  72. N. Weiner and I. Yavin, UV completions of magnetic inelastic and Rayleigh dark matter for the Fermi Line(s), Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 023523 [arXiv:1209.1093] [INSPIRE].

  73. G. Buchalla, A.J. Buras and M.E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 1125 [hep-ph/9512380] [INSPIRE].

  74. P. Nogueira, Automatic Feynman graph generation, J. Comput. Phys. 105 (1993) 279.

  75. J.A.M. Vermaseren, New features of FORM, math-ph/0010025 [INSPIRE].

  76. A. Alloul et al., FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].

  77. T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].

  78. T. Hahn and M. Pérez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565] [INSPIRE].

  79. M.J. Dugan and B. Grinstein, On the vanishing of evanescent operators, Phys. Lett. B 256 (1991) 239 [INSPIRE].

  80. J.C. Collins, A.V. Manohar and M.B. Wise, Renormalization of the vector current in QED, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 105019 [hep-th/0512187] [INSPIRE].

  81. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Standard Model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection I: weak-scale matching, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 043504 [arXiv:1401.3339] [INSPIRE].

  82. M.A. Fedderke, J.-Y. Chen, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, The Fermionic dark matter Higgs portal: an effective field theory approach, JHEP 08 (2014) 122 [arXiv:1404.2283] [INSPIRE].

  83. B. Grinstein, The static quark effective theory, Nucl. Phys. B 339 (1990) 253 [INSPIRE].

  84. E. Eichten and B.R. Hill, An effective field theory for the calculation of matrix elements involving heavy quarks, Phys. Lett. B 234 (1990) 511 [INSPIRE].

  85. H. Georgi, An effective field theory for heavy quarks at low-energies, Phys. Lett. B 240 (1990) 447 [INSPIRE].

  86. A. Berlin, D.S. Robertson, M.P. Solon and K.M. Zurek, Bino variations: effective field theory methods for dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 095008 [arXiv:1511.05964] [INSPIRE].

  87. M.E. Luke and A.V. Manohar, Reparametrization invariance constraints on heavy particle effective field theories, Phys. Lett. B 286 (1992) 348 [hep-ph/9205228] [INSPIRE].

  88. J. Hisano, R. Nagai and N. Nagata, Effective theories for dark matter nucleon scattering, JHEP 05 (2015) 037 [arXiv:1502.02244] [INSPIRE].

  89. J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083502 [arXiv:0907.3159] [INSPIRE].

  90. K.G. Chetyrkin, B.A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Decoupling relations to O\( \left({\alpha}_S^3\right) \) and their connection to low-energy theorems, Nucl. Phys. B 510 (1998) 61 [hep-ph/9708255] [INSPIRE].

  91. L. Baudis et al., Signatures of dark matter scattering inelastically off nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 115014 [arXiv:1309.0825] [INSPIRE].

  92. T. Banks, J.-F. Fortin and S. Thomas, Direct detection of dark matter electromagnetic dipole moments, arXiv:1007.5515 [INSPIRE].

  93. S. Kang, S. Scopel, G. Tomar and J.-H. Yoon, Present and projected sensitivities of Dark Matter direct detection experiments to effective WIMP-nucleus couplings, Astropart. Phys. 109 (2019) 50 [arXiv:1805.06113] [INSPIRE].

  94. QCDSF collaboration, Strangeness contribution to the proton spin from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 222001 [arXiv:1112.3354] [INSPIRE].

  95. M. Engelhardt, Strange quark contributions to nucleon mass and spin from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 114510 [arXiv:1210.0025] [INSPIRE].

  96. T. Bhattacharya, R. Gupta and B. Yoon, Disconnected quark loop contributions to nucleon structure, PoS(LATTICE2014)141 [arXiv:1503.05975] [INSPIRE].

  97. C. Alexandrou et al., Nucleon axial form factors using Nf = 2 twisted mass fermions with a physical value of the pion mass, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 054507 [arXiv:1705.03399] [INSPIRE].

  98. M.V. Polyakov, A. Schafer and O.V. Teryaev, The intrinsic charm contribution to the proton spin, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 051502 [hep-ph/9812393] [INSPIRE].

  99. L.F. Abbott, The background field method beyond one loop, Nucl. Phys. B 185 (1981) 189 [INSPIRE].

  100. L.F. Abbott, Introduction to the background field method, Acta Phys. Polon. B 13 (1982) 33 [INSPIRE].

  101. A. Denner, G. Weiglein and S. Dittmaier, Application of the background field method to the electroweak standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 440 (1995) 95 [hep-ph/9410338] [INSPIRE].

  102. Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].

  103. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].

  104. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators I: formalism and lambda dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].

  105. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].

  106. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].

  107. H. Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and penguins in rare B decays, Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 67 [hep-ph/9307274] [INSPIRE].

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), D-22607, Hamburg, Germany

    Fady Bishara

  2. Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221, USA

    Joachim Brod & Jure Zupan

  3. Department of Physics, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA

    Benjamin Grinstein

Authors
  1. Fady Bishara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joachim Brod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin Grinstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jure Zupan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fady Bishara.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1809.03506

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bishara, F., Brod, J., Grinstein, B. et al. Renormalization group effects in dark matter interactions. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)089

Download citation

  • Received: 07 January 2020

  • Accepted: 19 February 2020

  • Published: 16 March 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)089

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Beyond Standard Model
  • Effective Field Theories
  • Renormalization Group
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature