Abstract.
The relationships between the consistency (CONS) principle and two other axioms, dummy (DUM) and independence of irrelevant strategies (IIS) for solution concepts on families of strategic form games are studied. If a solution satisfies DUM and IIS, then it also satisfies CONS (Peleg and Tijs 1996). The converse of this proposition is not true: CONS implies neither DUM nor IIS as shown in two simple examples, using the concept of coalition-proof Nash equilibrium. The axiom of weak dummy (WDUM) is introduced. WDUM, along with IIS, implies CONS. Moreover, CONS implies WDUM.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 13 August 1998/Accepted: 19 January 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ray, I. Consistency, dummy and independence of irrelevant strategies for strategic games. Soc Choice Welfare 17, 217–222 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050016
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050016