Abstract
In this paper, we extend the classical notion of quasi-implication (“when a i is present then usually a j is also present”) to R-rules (rules of rules), the premisses and the conclusions of which can be rules themselves. A new statistical measure, based on the implicative intensity defined by Gras for quasi-implications, is defined to assess the significance of R-rules on a data set. We show how to organize R-rules in a new combinatorial structure, the directed hierarchy, which is inspired by the classical hierarchical classification. An incremental algorithm is developed to find the most significant R-rule “amalgamation”. An illustration is presented on a real data set stemming from a recent survey of the French Public Education Mathematical Teacher Society on the level in mathematics of pupils in the final year of secondary education and the perception of this subject.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Agrawal R, Imielinsky T, Swami A (1993) Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proceeding of the ACM SIGMOD'93, pp 207–216
Bailleul M (2001) Implicative networks for highlighting representations (in french). Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 154:31–46
Benzécri JP (1973) L'analyse des données (vol. 1): Taxonomie. Dunod, Paris
Blanchard J, Kuntz P, Guillet G, Gras R (2003) Implication intensity: from the basic definition to the entropic version – chapter 28. In: Chapman et al. (ed) Statistical data mining and knowledge discovery. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 475–493
Buntine W (1996) Graphical models for knowledge discovery. In: Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P (eds) Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 59–82
Gordon AD(1999) Classification. Chapman and Hall CRC, Londen/Boca Raton
Gras R (1996) L'implication statistique - Nouvelle méthode exploratoire de données. La Pensee Sauvage editions, France
Gras R, Briand H, Peter P (1996) Structuration sets with implication intensity. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ordinal and symbolic data analysis Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 147–156
Gras R, Kuntz P, Briand H (2001) The foundations of the implicative statistical analysis and some extensions for data mining (in french). Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines 154:9–29
Greenacre JM (1984) Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic, New York
Hilderman RJ, Hamilton HJ (2000) Heuristics measures of interestingness. In: Proceedings of the 4th European conference of principles of data mining and knowledge discovery, L.N.A.I. 1910, pp 232–241
Horschka P, Klösgen W (1991) A support system for interpreting statistical data. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Frawley W-J (eds), Knowledge discovery in databases, pp 325–345. AAAI Press, Menlo Park
Johnson SC (1967) Hierarchical clustering scheme. Psychometrika 32:241–254
Klementtinen M, Mannila H, Ronkainen P, Toivonen H, Verkamo AI (1994) Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered association rules. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, New York, pp 401–407
Kuntz P, Lehn R, Guillet F, Briand H (2000) A user-driven process for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of principles of data mining and knowledge discovery, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 483–489
Lent B, Swami AN, Widom J (1997) Clustering association rules. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on data engineering. IEEE Computer Society, pp 220–231
Lerman IC (1981) Classification et analyse ordinale des données. Dunod, Paris
Lerman IC (1993) Likelihood linkage analysis classification method. Biochimie 75:379–397
Silberschatz A, Tuzhilin A (1996) What makes patterns interesting in knowledge discovery systems. IEEE Trans on Knowl Data Eng 8(6):970–974
Skowron A, Stepaniuk J (2004) Information granules and rough-neuro computing. In: Pal SK, Polkowski L, Skowron A (eds) Rough-neural computing: Techniques for computing with words, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 43–84
Toivonen H, Klementtinen M, Ronkainen P, Hätönen K, Mannila H (1995) Pruning and grouping of discovered association rules. In: Workshop notes of the ECML workshop on statistics, machine learning, and knowledge discovery in databases. MLnet, Heraklion, pp 47–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gras, R., Kuntz, P. Discovering R-rules with a directed hierarchy. Soft Comput 10, 453–460 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-005-0506-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-005-0506-8