Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Implementing technology-enhanced collaborative writing in second and foreign language learning: A review of practices, technology and challenges

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technology-enhanced collaborative writing (TECW) for second language development is receiving increasing research attention from educators and teachers. However, there have been few review studies investigating how teachers implement this activity, how they use technology for the implementation, and what challenges they have. To better prepare practitioners to use digital tools for collaborative writing among their students, we reviewed 42 relevant studies focusing on their implementation identifying nine main TECW practices. These include: receiving teacher training; grouping students; training students on collaboration; training students on technology; providing students with new knowledge of writing; monitoring processes and giving immediate help; providing sufficient autonomy to students; evaluating outcomes and giving feedback; and encouraging students’ reflection. Technology could support TECW implementation by expediting information delivery, developing group workspaces and group chatrooms, recording students’ writing and collaboration behaviours and visualising their thoughts, enabling teacher commentary and information post, and presenting organised, analysed records of the TECW process. Challenges to TECW included: students’ reluctance to collaborate and difficulties using new technology. Based on the review, we argue that teachers can influence the implementation of TECW from cognitive, metacognitive, behavioural, and motivational aspects. Teacher training, student autonomy, and the size of writing groups are potential areas for future research in TECW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2020). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820933190.

  • Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C., & Lin, H. C. K. (2019). Effects of a mobile-based peer-assessment approach on enhancing language-learners’ oral proficiency. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12.

  • Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146, 103751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S. K., Wu, J., Kwan, C. W., & Lai, J. H. (2019). Wiki-based collaborative writing: A comparative study on first and second language writing among Chinese secondary students. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 10(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., & De Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers & Education, 75, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducate, L. C., Anderson, L. L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Blogs and wikis: Environments for online collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H. T., Yang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., & Wang, C. C. (2018). A scoping review of research on digital game-based language learning. Computers & Education, 126, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–23.

  • Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, O. P., & Maarof, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in summary writing: Student perceptions and problems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 599–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loncar, M., Schams, W., & Liang, J. S. (2021). Multiple technologies, multiple sources: trends and analyses of the literature on technology-mediated feedback for L2 English writing published from 2015–2019. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–63.

  • Lund, K. (2004). Human support in CSCL. In What we know about CSCL (pp. 167–198). Springer.

  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, T., Palonen, T., & Vauras, M. (2021). Guidance in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning: Capturing aspects of affect and teacher support in science classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1–27.

  • Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(2), 324–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1996). Introduction-What is accelerated learning? Accelerated Learning in the Classroom (pp. 1–12). Bloomsbury.

  • Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 5, 119–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talib, T., & Cheung, Y. L. (2017). Collaborative writing in classroom instruction: A synthesis of recent research. The English Teacher, 46(2), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, G. E. (2004). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., Bell, T., Mansfield, A., & Holmes, J. (2010). Role of the teacher in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyiatzaki, E., & Avouris, N. (2014). Support for the teacher in technology-enhanced collaborative classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Impact of pedagogic agent-mediated metacognitive support towards increasing task and group awareness in CSCL. Computers & Education, 134, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2020). Examination of the effectiveness of the task and group awareness support system used for computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–26.

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abe, M. (2021). L2 interactional competence in asynchronous multiparty text-based communication: Study of online collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 409–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, Z. (2016). Exploring collaboratively written L2 texts among first-year learners of German in Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1259–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, Z. I. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, Z., & Yıldız, S. (2014). Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 160–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., Lindström, B., & Rystedt, H. (2010). Rationalities of collaboration for language learning in a wiki. ReCALL, 22(2), 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). French learners’ past-tense development through collaborative writing tasks: The Role of procedural and content repetition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 76(2), 114–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y. C. J., & Lo, H. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducate, L. C., Anderson, L. L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H. C., & Lo, Y. F. (2018). Using wiki-mediated collaboration to foster L2 writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kılıçkaya, F. (2020). Learners’ perceptions of collaborative digital graphic writing based on semantic mapping. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1–2), 58–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C., Lei, C., & Liu, Y. (2016). The nature of collaboration and perceived learning in wiki-based collaborative writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levrai, P., & Bolster, A. (2019). A framework to support group essay writing in English for Academic Purposes: A case study from an English-medium instruction context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 186–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. (2013). Individual novices and collective experts: Collective immediate help in wiki-based small group writing. System, 41(3), 752–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2016). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, source: https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2998https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/writing-linguistics-facpubs/1

  • Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V., Barrett, N. E., Liu, G. Z., Chen, N. S., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2021). Supporting dyadic learning of English for tourism purposes with scenery-based virtual reality. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–37.

  • Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luquin, M., & Mayo, M. D. P. G. (2021). Exploring the use of models as a written corrective feedback technique among EFL children. System, 98, 102465.

  • Manegre, M., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2020). Foreign language learning through collaborative writing in knowledge building forums. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13.

  • Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–48.

  • Razak, N. A., & Saeed, M. A. (2014). Collaborative writing revision process among learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) in an online community of practice (CoP). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 580–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selcuk, H., Jones, J., & Vonkova, H. (2019). The emergence and influence of group leaders in web-based collaborative writing: self-reported accounts of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–21.

  • Such, B. (2021). Immediate help English language learners for online collaborative writing activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, M. F. (2021). Interactive-whiteboard-technology-supported collaborative writing: Writing achievement, metacognitive activities, and co-regulation patterns. System, 97, 102426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W., Van den Bergh, H. H., & Sercu, L. (2014). The mediating effect of instruction on pair composition in L2 revision and writing. Instructional Science, 42(6), 905–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. C. (2014). Using wikis to facilitate interaction and collaboration among EFL learners: A social constructivist approach to language teaching. System, 42, 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2015). Appropriation of a representational tool in a second-language classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. H., Chen, W., Chai, C. S., Chin, C. K., & Gao, P. (2011). A blended collaborative writing approach for Chinese L2 primary school students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1208–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, M., Chu, S., Ho, A., & Li, X. (2011). Using a wiki to scaffold primary-school students’ collaborative writing. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 279–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, T. (2021). Corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing and revision contributions. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, H. C. (2014). Exploring how collaborative dialogues facilitate synchronous collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenouzagh, Z. M. (2020). Syntactic complexity in individual, collaborative and E-collaborative EFL writing: Mediating role of writing modality, L1 and sustained development in focus. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 2939–2970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. (2018). Collaborative writing in the EFL classroom: The effects of L1 and L2 use. System, 76, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 670–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2020). Types purposes and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learninghttps://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666

  • Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2021b). A state-of-the-art review of the modes and effectiveness of multimedia input for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learninghttps://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1896555

  • Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2021a). Types features and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learninghttps://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880441

  • Zhang, R., Zou, Di., Cheng, G., Xie, H., Wang, F. L., Au, O. T. S., & Pan, Z. (2021). Target languages, types of activities, engagement, and effectiveness of extramural language learning. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0253431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253431

  • Su, F., & Zou, D. (2020). Technology-enhanced collaborative language learning: theoretical foundations technologies and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learninghttps://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1831545

  • Fu, Q., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2022). A review of AWE feedback: Types learning outcomes and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learninghttps://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787

  • Zou, D., Luo, S., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. (2020). A systematic review of research on flipped language classrooms: theoretical foundations learning activities tools research topics and findings. Computer Assisted Language Learninghttps://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839502

  • Zou, Di., Huang, Y., & Xie, H. (2021). Digital game-based vocabulary learning: where are we and where are we going? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640745

  • Zou, Di., Xie, H., Wang, F. L., & Kwan, R. (2020). Flipped learning with Wikipedia in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(5), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750195

  • Zou, Di., & Xie, H. (2018). Flipping an English writing class with technology-enhanced just-in-time teaching and peer instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495654

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Cluster Fund (RG 78/2019-2020R) and The One-off Special Fund from Central and Faculty Fund in Support of Research from 2019/20 to 2021/22 (MIT02/19-20) of The Education University of Hong Kong and The Teaching Development Grant (102489) of Lingnan University, Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Zou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 1 Investigated group sizes, technology, and teacher practices in the reviewed studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Zou, D., Cheng, G. et al. Implementing technology-enhanced collaborative writing in second and foreign language learning: A review of practices, technology and challenges. Educ Inf Technol 27, 8041–8069 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10941-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10941-9

Keywords