Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Group decision making based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate a novel approach to group decision making based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, which can avoid information distortion and obtain more credible decision making results. An interval transform function is defined, which can transform an intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation into an interval multiplicative preference relation. Then, an interval transform function based data envelopment analysis model is developed to obtain the ranking vector of consistent intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation, in which each of the alternatives is viewed as a decision making unit. Moreover, for any intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, we propose two DEA cross-efficiency models to get the cross-efficiency values of all alternatives, and we can calculate the normalized intuitionistic fuzzy priority weight vector of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation based on the cross-efficiency values. A goal programming model is investigated to derive the weight vector of decision makers. A step-by-step procedure for group decision making approach based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations is presented. Finally, numerical examples are given to illustrate the validity and applicability of the proposed method. This is the first attempt of employing the DEA cross-efficiency to the group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 98–109.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 56(5), 1278–1288.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., & Xu, Z. (2014). Priorities of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation based on multiplicative consistency. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(6), 1669–1681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X., & Merigo, J. M. (2015). Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(4), 1211–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Xu, Q., Chen, H., Zhou, L., Zhu, J., & Tao, Z. (2017). Group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on DEA and stochastic simulation. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3254-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, F., Tang, J., & Xu, Z. (2017). A 0-1 mixed programming model based method for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. (2006). Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research, 33(5), 1289–1307.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(1), 107–117.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. (2013). Derivation of intuitionistic fuzzy weights based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9), 6377–6388.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. (2015). A note on “A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making”. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(3), 867–871.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Chin, K. S., & Poon, G. K. K. (2008). A data envelopment analysis method with assurance region for weight generation in the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 913–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Chiclana, F., & Liao, H. (2018). Isomorphic multiplicative transitivity for intuitionistic and interval-valued fuzzy preference relations and its application in deriving their priority vectors. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(1), 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, M., & Chen, J. (2015). Studies on interval multiplicative preference relations and their application to group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(1), 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2007a). A survey of preference relations. International Journal of General Systems, 36(2), 179–203.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2007b). Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences, 177(11), 2363–2379.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2012). An error-analysis-based method for the priority of an intuitionistic preference relation in decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 33, 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2013). Compatibility analysis of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(3), 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., & Cai, X. (2010). Recent advances in intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 9(4), 359–381.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., & Liao, H. (2015). A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80(5), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., & Xia, M. (2014). Iterative algorithms for improving consistency of intuitionistic preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(5), 708–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2012). A new method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy values and its application in multi-attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 11(2), 135–146.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71501002, 61502003, 71871001, 71771001, and 71701001), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 1608085QF133, 1508085QG149), Anhui Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Youth Foundation (No. AHSKQ2016D13).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China

    Jinpei Liu & Jingmiao Song

  2. Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7906, USA

    Jinpei Liu

  3. School of Computer Science and Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China

    Qin Xu

  4. School of Economics, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China

    Zhifu Tao

  5. School of Mathematical Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China

    Huayou Chen

Authors
  1. Jinpei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingmiao Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhifu Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huayou Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinpei Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Song, J., Xu, Q. et al. Group decision making based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 18, 345–370 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-018-9297-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-018-9297-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation