Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Improving customer acquisition models by incorporating spatial autocorrelation at different levels of granularity

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional CRM models often ignore the correlation that could exist among the purchasing behavior of surrounding prospects. Hence, a generalized linear autologistic regression model can be used to capture this interdependence and improve the predictive performance of the model. In particular, customer acquisition models can benefit from this. These models often suffer from a lack of data quality due to the limited amount of information available about potential new customers. Based on a customer acquisition model of a Japanese automobile brand, this study shows that the extra value resulting from incorporating neighborhood effects can vary significantly depending on the granularity level on which the neighborhoods are composed. A model based on a granularity level that is too coarse or too fine will incorporate too much or too little interdependence resulting in a less than optimal predictive improvement. Since neighborhood effects can have several sources (i.e. social influence, homophily and exogeneous shocks), this study suggests that the autocorrelation can be divided into several parts, each optimally measured at a different level of granularity. Therefore, a model is introduced that simultaneously incorporates multiple levels of granularity resulting in even more accurate predictions. Further, the effect of the sample size is examined. This shows that including spatial interdependence using finer levels of granularity is only useful when enough data is available to construct stable spatial lag effects. As a result, extending a spatial model with multiple granularity levels becomes increasingly valuable when the data sample becomes larger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Allsop, D.T., Bassett, B.R., Hoskins, J.A. (2007). Word-of-mouth research: principles and applications. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 398–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4, 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin, N.H., Mugglestone, M.A., Buckland S.T. (1996). An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecke, P., & Van den Poel, D. (2010). Improving purchasing behavior predictions by data augmentation with situational variables. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9, 853–872.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baecke, P., & Van den Poel, D. (2011). Data augmentation by predicting spending pleasure using commercially available external data. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 36, 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecke, P., & Van den Poel, D. (2012). Including spatial interdependence in customer acquisition models: a cross-category comparison. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 12105–12113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.R., & Song, S. (2007). Neighborhood effects and trail on the internet: evidence from online grocery retailing. QME-Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5, 361–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besang, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Methodological, 36, 192–236.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Besang, J. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. The Statistican, 24, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 992–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradlow, E.T., Bronnenberg, B., Russell, G.J., Arora, N., Bell, D.R., Duvvuri, S.D., TerHofstede, F., Sismeiro, C., Thomadsen, R., Yang, S. (2005). Spatial models in marketing. Marketing Letters, 16, 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronnenberg, B.J. (2005). Spatial models in marketing research and practice. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21, 335–343.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bronnenberg, B.J., & Mahajan, V. (2001). Unobserved retailer behavior in multimarket data: joint spatial dependence in market shares and promotional variables. Marketing Science, 20, 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carl, W. (2006). What’s all the buzz about? Everyday communication and the relational basis of word-of-mouth and buzz marketing practices. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 601–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Q.I., Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: a natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M., Clarke-Pearson, D.L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or morecorrelated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837–845.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M., Ikäheimo, S. (2008). Social influence and consumption: evidence from the automobile purchases of neighbors. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 735–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, J.H., & McNeil, B.J. (1982). The meaning and use of area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, W.R., Nair, N., Manchanda, P., Bothner, M., Dodds, P., Godes, D., Hosanagar K., Tucker C. (2008). Modeling social interactions: identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 19, 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, F., Zhou, J., Zhu, H. (2003). Autologistic regression model for the distribution of vegetation. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 8, 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeting, J.A., Leecaster, M., Bowden, D. (2000). An improved model for spatially correlated binary responses. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 5, 102–114.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huffer, F.W., & Wu, H. (1998). Markov Chain Monte Carlo for autologistic regression models with application to the distribution of plant species. Biometrics, 54, 509–524.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W., Mela, C.F., Ansari, A., Bodapati, A., Fader, P., Iyengar, R., Naik, P., Neslin, S., Sun, B., Verhoef, P.C., Wedel M., Wilcox, R. (2005). Choice models and customer relationship management. Marketing Letters, 16, 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. (2007). Unleashing the power of word of mouth: creating brand advocacy to drive growth. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 448–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.S. (2006). Toward a successful CRM: variable selection, sampling, and ensemble. Decision Support Systems, 41, 542–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R., & Yen, D.C. (2001). Customer relationship management: an analysis framework and implementation strategies. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41, 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda, P., Xie, Y., Youn, N. (2008). The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Science, 27, 961–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, R. (2009). Explaining sociospatial patterns in South East Queensland, Australia: social homophily versus structural homophily. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2201–2214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder J.A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S., & Russel, G.J. (2008). Predicting product purchase from inferred customer similarity: an autologistic model approach. Marketing Science, 54, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, E.W.T., Xiu, L., Chau, D.C.K. (2009). Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: a literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 2592–2602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrison, L.A., Blattberg, R.C., Wang, P. (1993). Database marketing past, present and future. Journal of Direct Marketing, 7, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenburgh, T.J., & Ainslie, A. (2003). Massively categorical variables: revealing the information in zip codes. Marketing Science, 22, 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., & Huffer, F.W. (1997). Modelling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 4, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., & Allenby, G.M. (2003). Modeling interdependent customer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Both authors acknowledge the IAP research network grant nr. P6/03 of the Belgian government (Belgian Science Policy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Van den Poel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baecke, P., Van den Poel, D. Improving customer acquisition models by incorporating spatial autocorrelation at different levels of granularity. J Intell Inf Syst 41, 73–90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-012-0225-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-012-0225-4

Keywords