Abstract
Traditional CRM models often ignore the correlation that could exist among the purchasing behavior of surrounding prospects. Hence, a generalized linear autologistic regression model can be used to capture this interdependence and improve the predictive performance of the model. In particular, customer acquisition models can benefit from this. These models often suffer from a lack of data quality due to the limited amount of information available about potential new customers. Based on a customer acquisition model of a Japanese automobile brand, this study shows that the extra value resulting from incorporating neighborhood effects can vary significantly depending on the granularity level on which the neighborhoods are composed. A model based on a granularity level that is too coarse or too fine will incorporate too much or too little interdependence resulting in a less than optimal predictive improvement. Since neighborhood effects can have several sources (i.e. social influence, homophily and exogeneous shocks), this study suggests that the autocorrelation can be divided into several parts, each optimally measured at a different level of granularity. Therefore, a model is introduced that simultaneously incorporates multiple levels of granularity resulting in even more accurate predictions. Further, the effect of the sample size is examined. This shows that including spatial interdependence using finer levels of granularity is only useful when enough data is available to construct stable spatial lag effects. As a result, extending a spatial model with multiple granularity levels becomes increasingly valuable when the data sample becomes larger.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Allsop, D.T., Bassett, B.R., Hoskins, J.A. (2007). Word-of-mouth research: principles and applications. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 398–411.
Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4, 291–295.
Augustin, N.H., Mugglestone, M.A., Buckland S.T. (1996). An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 339–347.
Baecke, P., & Van den Poel, D. (2010). Improving purchasing behavior predictions by data augmentation with situational variables. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9, 853–872.
Baecke, P., & Van den Poel, D. (2011). Data augmentation by predicting spending pleasure using commercially available external data. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 36, 367–383.
Baecke, P., & Van den Poel, D. (2012). Including spatial interdependence in customer acquisition models: a cross-category comparison. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 12105–12113.
Bell, D.R., & Song, S. (2007). Neighborhood effects and trail on the internet: evidence from online grocery retailing. QME-Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5, 361–400.
Besang, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Methodological, 36, 192–236.
Besang, J. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. The Statistican, 24, 179–195.
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 992–1026.
Bradlow, E.T., Bronnenberg, B., Russell, G.J., Arora, N., Bell, D.R., Duvvuri, S.D., TerHofstede, F., Sismeiro, C., Thomadsen, R., Yang, S. (2005). Spatial models in marketing. Marketing Letters, 16, 267–278.
Bronnenberg, B.J. (2005). Spatial models in marketing research and practice. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21, 335–343.
Bronnenberg, B.J., & Mahajan, V. (2001). Unobserved retailer behavior in multimarket data: joint spatial dependence in market shares and promotional variables. Marketing Science, 20, 284–299.
Carl, W. (2006). What’s all the buzz about? Everyday communication and the relational basis of word-of-mouth and buzz marketing practices. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 601–634.
Chen, Y., Wang, Q.I., Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: a natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 238–254.
DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M., Clarke-Pearson, D.L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or morecorrelated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837–845.
Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M., Ikäheimo, S. (2008). Social influence and consumption: evidence from the automobile purchases of neighbors. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 735–753.
Hanley, J.H., & McNeil, B.J. (1982). The meaning and use of area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36.
Hartmann, W.R., Nair, N., Manchanda, P., Bothner, M., Dodds, P., Godes, D., Hosanagar K., Tucker C. (2008). Modeling social interactions: identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 19, 287–304.
He, F., Zhou, J., Zhu, H. (2003). Autologistic regression model for the distribution of vegetation. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 8, 205–222.
Hoeting, J.A., Leecaster, M., Bowden, D. (2000). An improved model for spatially correlated binary responses. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 5, 102–114.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
Huffer, F.W., & Wu, H. (1998). Markov Chain Monte Carlo for autologistic regression models with application to the distribution of plant species. Biometrics, 54, 509–524.
Kamakura, W., Mela, C.F., Ansari, A., Bodapati, A., Fader, P., Iyengar, R., Naik, P., Neslin, S., Sun, B., Verhoef, P.C., Wedel M., Wilcox, R. (2005). Choice models and customer relationship management. Marketing Letters, 16, 279–291.
Keller, E. (2007). Unleashing the power of word of mouth: creating brand advocacy to drive growth. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 448–452.
Kim, Y.S. (2006). Toward a successful CRM: variable selection, sampling, and ensemble. Decision Support Systems, 41, 542–553.
Ling, R., & Yen, D.C. (2001). Customer relationship management: an analysis framework and implementation strategies. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41, 82–97.
Manchanda, P., Xie, Y., Youn, N. (2008). The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Science, 27, 961–976.
McCrea, R. (2009). Explaining sociospatial patterns in South East Queensland, Australia: social homophily versus structural homophily. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2201–2214.
McCullagh, P., & Nelder J.A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
Moon, S., & Russel, G.J. (2008). Predicting product purchase from inferred customer similarity: an autologistic model approach. Marketing Science, 54, 71–82.
Ngai, E.W.T., Xiu, L., Chau, D.C.K. (2009). Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: a literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 2592–2602.
Petrison, L.A., Blattberg, R.C., Wang, P. (1993). Database marketing past, present and future. Journal of Direct Marketing, 7, 27–43.
Steenburgh, T.J., & Ainslie, A. (2003). Massively categorical variables: revealing the information in zip codes. Marketing Science, 22, 40–57.
Wu, H., & Huffer, F.W. (1997). Modelling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 4, 49–64.
Yang, S., & Allenby, G.M. (2003). Modeling interdependent customer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 282–294.
Acknowledgements
Both authors acknowledge the IAP research network grant nr. P6/03 of the Belgian government (Belgian Science Policy).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baecke, P., Van den Poel, D. Improving customer acquisition models by incorporating spatial autocorrelation at different levels of granularity. J Intell Inf Syst 41, 73–90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-012-0225-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-012-0225-4