Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

The optimization network video quality assessment method based on fuzzy inference

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the optimization network video quality objective assessment method based on fuzzy inference (FI) is proposed. Firstly, the experimental system is built to extract the different types of impairment factors. At the same time, many people are arranged to assess the video quality and give the subjective scores. Secondly, the impairment factors are considered and trained by the support vector machine (SVM) to categorize the video quality. So the corresponding impairment factors of network video will also be categorized and the subjective and objective categories can be compared. Thirdly, the impairment factors of different categories are inputted into the fuzzy inference system. Meanwhile, different categories of fuzzy inference steps are simplified, and the specific objective scores are calculated. At last, the proposed method is compared with other methods; the experimental results show that this method can improve the accuracy. This paper has two contributions: 1. The video quality can be classified by SVM, and the objective scores can be calculated by FI. In addition, different categories of fuzzy inference steps are invented to simplify the inference process.2. Compared with other objective methods, the proposed method can improve the similarity between the subjective and objective scores. This paper will give the detail analysis of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galkandage, C., Calic, J., Dogan, S.: Full-reference stereoscopic video quality assessment using a motion sensitive HVS model. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 31(2), 452–466 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi, Wenjuan, Sun, Yanjing, Pan, Jinqiu: Continuous prediction for quality of experience in wireless video streaming”. IEEE Access. 7, 70343–70354 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tao, Xiaoming, Duan, Yiping, Mai, Xu., Meng, Zhishen, Jianhua, Lu.: Learning QoE of mobile video transmission with deep neural network: a data-driven approach”. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 37(6), 1337–1348 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, Yu., Gao, X., He, L., et al.: Objective video quality assessment combining transfer learning with CNN. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks and Learn. Syst 31(8), 2716–2730 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ling, S., Gutiérrez, J., Ke, Gu., Le Callet, P.: Prediction of the influence of navigation scan-path on perceived quality of free-viewpoint videos. IEEE J. Emerg. Select Topics. Circ. Syst 9(1), 204–216 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghadiyaram, D., Pan, J., Bovik, A.C.: A subjective and objective study of stalling events in mobile streaming videos. IEEE Trans. Circu. Syst. Video Technol. 29(1), 183–197 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei, Wu., Li, Q., Chen, Z., et al.: Semantic information oriented no-reference video quality assessment. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 28, 204–208 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dendi, Sathya Veera Reddy., Channappayya, Sumohana S.: No-reference video quality assessment using natural spatiotemporal scene statistics. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 29, 5612–5624 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Song, J., Yang, F., Zhang, W., et al.: Parametric model for video streaming services with different spatial and temporal resolutions. IEEE Trans. Circ Syst. Video Technol. 31(9), 3380–3390 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Min, Xiongkuo, Zhai, Guangtao, Zhou, Jiantao, et al.: Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of audio-visual signals. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 29, 6054–6068 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, Yun, Zhang, Huan, Mei, Yu., et al.: Sparse representaion-based video quality assessment for synthesized 3D videos. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 29, 509–524 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Usman, M.A., Usman, M.R., Shin, S.Y.: A novel no reference metric for estimating the impact of frame freezing artifacts on perceptual quality of streamed videos. IEEE Trans. Multimedia. 20(9), 2344–2359 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qingbo, Wu., Li, Hongliang, Meng, Fanman, Ngan, King N.: toward a blind quality metric for temporally distorted streaming video. IEEE Trans. Broadcas. 64(2), 367–378 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shang, Xiwu, Liang, Jie, Wang, Guozhong, Zhao, Haiwu, Chengjia, Wu., Lin, Chang: color-sensitivity-based combined PSNR for objective video quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 29(5), 1239–1250 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sudeng, Hu., Jin, Lina, Wang, Hanli, Zhang, Yun, Sam Kwong, C.-C., Kuo, Jay: Objective video quality assessment based on perceptually weighted mean squared error. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 27(9), 1844–1855 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zou, Wenjie, Yang, Fuzheng, Song, Jiarun, Wan, Shuai, Zhang, Wei, Hong Ren, Wu.: Event-based perceptual quality assessment for HTTP-based video streaming with playback interruption. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. 20(6), 1475–1488 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamagishi, Kazuhisa, Hayashi, Takanori: Parametric quality-estimation model for adaptive-bitrate-streaming services. IEEE Trans. Multimedia. 19(7), 1545–1557 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, W., Liu, H.: Study of saliency in objective video quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(3), 1275–1288 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Duanmu, Z., Zeng, K., Ma, K., Rehman, A., Wang, Z.: A quality-of-experience index for streaming video. IEEE J. Select. Topics. Signal Process. 11(1), 154–166 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barman, Nabajeet, Jammeh, Emmanuel, Ghorashi, Seyed Ali, Martini, Maria G.: No-reference video quality estimation based on machine learning for passive gaming video streaming applications. IEEE Access. 7, 74511–74527 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Z., Rehman, A.: Begin with the end in mind: a unified end-to-end quality-of-experience monitoring, optimization, and management framework. SMPTE Motion Imaging J 128(2), 1–8 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, Zhibo, Liao, Ning, Xiaodong, Gu., Feng, Wu., Shi, Guangming: Hybrid distortion ranking tuned bitstream-layer video quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 26(6), 1029–1043 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodríguez, D.Z., Rosa, R.L., Costa, E.A., Abrahão, J., Bressan, G.: Video quality assessment in video streaming services considering user preference for video content. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 60(3), 436–444 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duanmu, Z., Ma, K., Wang, Z.: Quality of experience for adaptive streaming videos: an expectation confirmation theory motivated approach. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27(12), 6135–6146 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Fan Li, Fu., Shuang, Ziyi Liu, Qian, Xueming: A cost-constrained video quality satisfaction study on mobile devices. IEEE Trans. Multimedia. 20(5), 1154–1168 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ricky, K.P.M., Edmond W.W.C., Rocky K.C.C.: Measuring the quality of experience of http video streaming. In: Presented at 2011 12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management and Workshops, Dublin, Ireland, 23–27 (2011)

  27. Zheng, XU., Yang BO., Liu Y., Shi, G.: Blockiness evaluation for reducing blocking artifacts in compressed images. In: Presented at 2009 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics,Las,Vegas,NV,USA, 10–14 (2009)

  28. Kawano, T., Yamagishi, K., Watanabe, K., Jun O.: No reference video-quality-assessment model for video streaming services. In: Presented at 2010 18th International Packet Video Workshop, Hong Kong, China, 13–14 (2010)

  29. Zhao, Z-B., Yuan, J-S., Gao, Q., Kong, Y-H.: Wavelet image de-noising method based on noise standard deviation estimation. In: Presented at 2007 International Conference on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition, Beijing, China, Nov 2–4 (2007)

  30. Jianxin, Wu., Yang, H.: Linear regression-based efficient SVM learning for large-scale classification. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks and Learn. Syst 26(10), 2357–2369 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Huo, L.-Z., Tang, P.: A batch-mode active learning algorithm using region-partitioning diversity for SVM classifier. IEEE J. Select. Topics. Appl. Earth Observat. Remote Sens 7(4), 1036–1046 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo, Y., Jia, X., Paull, D.: Effective sequential classifier training for svm-based multitemporal remote sensing image classification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27(6), 3036–3048 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Naji, A.A., Lee, S.-H., Chahl, J.: Quality index evaluation of videos based on fuzzy interface system. IET Image Process. 1(5), 292–300 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiming Shi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, Z. The optimization network video quality assessment method based on fuzzy inference. SIViP 16, 1399–1407 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-021-02092-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-021-02092-0

Keywords