Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Chemical reaction optimization: survey on variants

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO) is a recently established population based metaheuristic for optimization problems inspired by the natural behavior of chemical reactions . Optimization is a way of ensuring the usability of resources and related technologies in the best possible way. We experience optimization problems in our daily lives while some problems are so hard that we can, at best, approximate the best solutions with heuristic or metaheuristic methods. This search (CRO) algorithm inherits several features from other metaheuristics like Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm. After its invention, it was successfully applied to various optimization problems that were solved by other metaheuristic algorithms . The robustness of CRO algorithm was proved when the comparisons with other evolutionary algorithms like Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, Simulated Annealing, Ant Colony Optimization, Tabu Search, Bee Colony Optimization etc. showed the superior results. As a result, the CRO algorithm has been started to use for solving problems in different fields of optimization . In this paper, we have reviewed the CRO based algorithms with respect to some well-known optimization problems. A brief description of variants of CRO algorithm will help the readers to understand the diversified quality of CRO algorithm. For different problems where CRO algorithms were used, the study on parameters and the experimental results are included to show the robustness of CRO algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://sites.google.com/site/slimbechikh/sourcecodes.

  2. http://cro.eee.hku.hk.

  3. https://github.com/oyld/cro.

References

  1. Blum C (2005) Ant colony optimization: introduction and recent trends. Phys Life Rev 2(4):353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shadbolt N (2004) Nature-inspired computing. IEEE Intell Syst 19(1):2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garey MR (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of np-completeness. Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da USP 44(2):340

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang XS (2010) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press, Osaka

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sörensen K (2015) Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed. Int Trans Oper Res 22(1):3–18

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fister Jr I, Yang XS, Fister I, Brest J, Fister D (2013) A brief review of nature-inspired algorithms for optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.4186

  7. Eiben AE, Smith JE et al (2003) Introduction to evolutionary computing, vol 53. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Salami NM (2009) Evolutionary algorithm definition. Am J Eng Appl Sci 2(4):789–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holland J, Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2001) Swarm intelligence. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-55860-595-4.X5000-1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dorigo M, Birattari M, Stützle T (2006) Ant colony optimization—artificial ants as a computational intelligence technique. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 1(4):28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brooks SP, Morgan BJ (1995) Optimization using simulated annealing. The Statistician 44:241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lam AY, Li VO (2010) Chemical-reaction-inspired metaheuristic for optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 14(3):381–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu J, Lam AY, Li VO (2010) Parallel chemical reaction optimization for the quadratic assignment problem. In: World congress in computer science, computer engineering, and applied computing, Worldcomp 2010

  15. Xu J, Lam AY, Li VO (2011) Chemical reaction optimization for task scheduling in grid computing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 22(10):1624–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lam AY, Li VO (2010) Chemical reaction optimization for cognitive radio spectrum allocation. In: Global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2010), 2010 IEEE. IEEE, pp 1–5

  17. Truong TK, Li K, Xu Y (2013) Chemical reaction optimization with greedy strategy for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Appl Soft Comput 13(4):1774–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Truong TK, Li K, Xu Y, Ouyang A, Tang X (2013) An artificial chemical reaction optimization algorithm for multiple-choice knapsack problem. In: Proceedings on the international conference on artificial intelligence (ICAI). The steering committee of the world congress in computer science, computer engineering and applied computing (WorldComp), p 1

  19. Xu J, Lam AY, Li VO (2011) Stock portfolio selection using chemical reaction optimization. In: Proceedings of international conference on operations research and financial engineering (ICORFE 2011), pp 458–463

  20. Ngambusabongsopa R, Li Z, Eldesouky E (2015) A hybrid mutation chemical reaction optimization algorithm for global numerical optimization. Math Probl Eng 2015, Article ID 375902. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/375902

  21. Islam MR, Asha ZT, Ahmed R (2015) Longest common subsequence using chemical reaction optimization. In: 2015 2nd international conference on electrical information and communication technology (EICT). IEEE, pp 29–33

  22. Saifullah CK, Islam MR (2016) Solving shortest common supersequence problem using chemical reaction optimization. In: 2016 5th international conference on informatics, electronics and vision (ICIEV). IEEE, pp 50–55

  23. Eldos T, Kanan A, Nazih W, Khatatbih A (2015) Adapting the chemical reaction optimization algorithm to the printed circuit board drilling problem. In: International conference on computer, computational and mathematical sciences. Zürich, Switzerland

  24. Xu Y, Li K, He L, Truong TK (2013) A dag scheduling scheme on heterogeneous computing systems using double molecular structure-based chemical reaction optimization. J Parallel Distrib Comput 73(9):1306–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nayak J, Naik B, Behera HS, Abraham A (2017) Hybrid chemical reaction based metaheuristic with fuzzy c-means algorithm for optimal cluster analysis. Expert Syst Appl 79:282–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bensedira B, Layeb A, Bouzoubia S, Habbas Z (2016) CRO-CARP: a chemical reaction optimization for capacitated arc routing problem. In: 2016 8th international conference on modelling, identification and control (ICMIC). IEEE, pp 757–762

  27. Sahu SR, Behera HS (2016) A hybrid CRO-based FLANN for financial stock market forecasting. Int J Data Anal Tech Strateg 8(3):261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Szeto W, Liu Y, Ho SC (2016) Chemical reaction optimization for solving a static bike repositioning problem. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 47:104–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dam TL, Li K, Fournier-Viger P (2017) Chemical reaction optimization with unified tabu search for the vehicle routing problem. Soft Comput 21(21):6421–6433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahmud MR, Pritom RM, Islam MR (2017) Optimization of collaborative transportation scheduling in supply chain management with TPL using chemical reaction optimization. In: 2017 20th international conference of computer and information technology (ICCIT). IEEE, pp 1–6

  31. Lam AY, Li VO (2012) Chemical reaction optimization: a tutorial. Memet Comput 4(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bechikh S, Chaabani A, Said LB (2015) An efficient chemical reaction optimization algorithm for multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(10):2051–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chaabani A, Bechikh S, Said LB (2018) A new co-evolutionary decomposition-based algorithm for bi-level combinatorial optimization. Appl Intell 48(9):2847–2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Deb K (2014) Multi-objective optimization. In: Search methodologies. Springer, pp 403–449

  35. Bechikh S, Said LB, Ghédira K (2011) Negotiating decision makers’ reference points for group preference-based evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: 2011 11th international conference on hybrid intelligent systems (HIS). IEEE, pp 377–382

  36. Lam AY, Li VO, Xu J (2013) On the convergence of chemical reaction optimization for combinatorial optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 17(5):605–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Islam MR, Saifullah CK, Asha ZT, Ahamed R (2018) Chemical reaction optimization for solving longest common subsequence problem for multiple string. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3200-3

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kabir R, Islam R (2018) Chemical reaction optimization for RNA structure prediction. Appl Intell 49(2):352–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Guggenheim EA (1985) Thermodynamics—an advanced treatment for chemists and physicists. Amsterdam, North-Holland, p 414

  40. Yu JJQ, Lam AYS, Li VOK (2012) Real-coded chemical reaction optimization with different perturbation functions. In: 2012 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC). IEEE, pp 1–8

  41. Dong H, He J, Huang H, Hou W (2007) Evolutionary programming using a mixed mutation strategy. Inf Sci 177(1):312–327

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Nguyen TT, Li Z, Zhang S, Truong TK (2014) A hybrid algorithm based on particle swarm and chemical reaction optimization. Expert Syst Appl 41(5):2134–2143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li H, Wang L, Hei X (2016) Decomposition-based chemical reaction optimization (CRO) and an extended CRO algorithms for multiobjective optimization. J Comput Sci 17:174–204

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Nayak S, Misra B, Behera H (2017) Artificial chemical reaction optimization of neural networks for efficient prediction of stock market indices. Ain Shams Eng J 8:371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saifullah CK, Islam MR (2016) Chemical reaction optimization for solving shortest common supersequence problem. Comput Biol Chem 64:82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Szeto WY, Wang Y, Wong SC (2014) The chemical reaction optimization approach to solving the environmentally sustainable network design problem. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 29(2):140–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu JJQ, Lam AYS, Li VOK (2011) Evolutionary artificial neural network based on chemical reaction optimization. In: 2011 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC). IEEE, pp 2083–2090

  48. Yu JJQ, Lam AYS, Li VOK (2014) Chemical reaction optimization for the set covering problem. In: 2014 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC). IEEE, pp 512–519

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science and Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, 9208, Bangladesh

    Md. Rafiqul Islam & Md. Riaz Mahmud

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

    C. M. Khaled Saifullah

Authors
  1. Md. Rafiqul Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. M. Khaled Saifullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md. Riaz Mahmud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Rafiqul Islam.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M.R., Saifullah, C.M.K. & Mahmud, M.R. Chemical reaction optimization: survey on variants. Evol. Intel. 12, 395–420 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00246-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00246-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation