Abstract
eParticipation systems are often directly targeted at citizens. However, as a group of potential users, citizens form a heterogeneous and unpredictable group, which makes requirements elicitation a challenging issue. Based on recently developed ideas for wide audience requirement engineering (WARE), this chapter discusses and elaborates a method for eliciting citizen requirements for eParticipation. The method elaboration was conducted in connection with a project in southern Norway, where young people’s requirements for becoming active e-participants in society were mapped. Based on these experiences, we discuss the use and usefulness of the WARE method and suggest ideas on how to further develop the WARE method for eParticipation purposes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Flak, L., Sein, M., and Sæbø, Ø. (2007). Towards a cumulative tradition in e-government research: going beyond the Gs and Cs. In Electronic Government (pp. 13–22).
Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R. (1993). The voice of the customer. Marketing Science, 12(1), 1–27.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hoff, J., Lofgren, K., and Torpe, L. (2003). The state we are in: E-democracy in Denmark. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 8(1/2), 49–66, IOS Press.
Kelly, G. A. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs. London: Routledge.
Macintosh, A., Robson, E., Smith, E., and Whyte, A. (2003). Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 43–54.
Mahrer, H., and Krimmer, R. (2005). Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: identifying the notion of the 'middleman paradox'. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 27–42.
Morgan, D. L., and Krueger, R. A. (1998). The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Päivärinta, T., and Sæbø, Ø. (2006). Models of e-democracy. Communication of Association of Information Systems, 17, 818–840.
Päivärinta, T., and Sæbø, Ø. (Forthcoming). The genre system lens on eDemocracy. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems.
Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., and Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly 25, 400–428.
Strauss, A. L., and Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tuunanen, T. (2005). Requirements elicitation for wide audience end-users. Helsinki.
Tuunanen, T., Peffers, K., and Gengler, C. E. (2004). Wide audience requirements engineering (WARE): a practical method and case study.
Tuunanen, T., and Rossi, M. (2004). Engineering a method for wide audience requirements elicitation and integrating it to software development. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
Van Dijk, J. (2000). Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In K. L. Hacker and J. Van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy, issues of theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sæbø, Ø., Päivärinta, T., Austbø, J.H., Scheie, S.S. (2009). Elaborating the WARE Method for eParticipation Requirements. In: Papadopoulos, G., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Wrycza, S., Zupancic, J. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_82
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_82
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-84809-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-84810-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)