Abstract
Because of the decreased profitability of making synthetic fuels, Sasol intends expanding its production of the higher valued chemicals, in particular waxes and olefins. The advantages and disadvantages of using Fe, Co and Ru catalysts are discussed from the point of view of costs, availability, product selectivity, activity and sensitivity to poisons.
The loss of activity and selectivity of iron based catalysts in both fixed and fluidized bed reactors is discussed. The main contributing factors are sulfur poisoning, oxidation and coke fouling. In fixed bed reactors sulfur poisoning and “coke” laydown deactivates the front end of the bed while hydrothermal sintering/oxidation deactivates the back end. In fluidized beds the deposition of large amounts of Boudouard carbon doesnot markedly lower the activity. The smaller catalyst particles end up consisting of small iron carbide entities embedded in a matrix of carbon. The larger catalyst particles consist of cores of inert magnetite surrounded by the carbide/carbon matrix.
FT reactor development at Sasol is briefly reviewed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.E. Dry, in:Industrial Chemicals via C1 Processes, ed. D.R. Fahey (ACS Symposium Series 328, 1986) Ch. 2.
M.E. Dry, in:Catalysis Science and Technology, eds. J.R. Anderson and M. Boudart, Vol. 1. (Springer-Verlag, 1981) Ch. 4.
E. Shutt and M. Wyatt, Nouvelles de la Science et des Technologies, Vol 6 (2) (June 1988) pp 107–112.
B. Sarup and B.W. Wojciechowski, Canadian J. Chem. Eng. 67 (1989) 62.
G. Ertl, D. Prigge, R. Schlogl and M. Weiss, J. Catal. 79 (1983) 359.
P.M. Loggenberg, M.E. Dry and R.G. Copperthwaite, in Press (ECASIA 89, Antibes, France).
M.E. Dry, Due for publication in “Catalysis Today” Jan. 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dry, M.E. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over iron catalysts. Catal Lett 7, 241–251 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764506
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764506