Abstract
Progress in understanding the way the brain processes information while it is constantly interacting with the sensory environment is hampered by inadequate models and theories. Current models and theories of brain computing are, obviously, still not completely correct when confronted with so-called real-world problems. Sensory recognition and the subsequent selection and optimization of a proper behavior are basically constraint satisfaction problems. Both conventional AI and current formal neural network systems operate with set constraints: the architecture and parameters are defined a priori and then the input data are structured according to these set constraints on the learning process. However, as long as the constraints are set from outside the system (by the programmer, designer), the system has no ability for self-organization. There is the ability for adaptation within these a priori defined limits, but not the ability to include new knowledge into the consistent relational framework of existing knowledge beyond the prespecified constraints. Therefore, self-organization of constraints in complex systems is the key problem for getting self-organization of knowledge representation under real-world conditions. We show that a value system and self-referential control in a modular architecture are crucial prerequisites for both robust recognition of sensory input and the ability to integrate new knowledge into the already acquired knowledge representation. Finally, we outline a philosophy and propose a model approach that is a first step toward implementing those capabilities in artificial neural systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind. Basic Books. New York
Pollack JB (1993) On wings of knowledge: a review of Allan Newell's unified theories of congnition. AI 59:355–369.
Koerner E, Koerner U, Matsumoto G (1996) Top-down selfor-ganization of semantic constraints for knowledge representation in autonomous systems: the role of a value system for autonomous systems. Bull Electrotech Lab 60(7):1–5
Barlow H (1994) What is the computational goal of the neocortex? In: Koch C, Davis JL (eds) Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain. MIT, London, pp 1–22
Pandya DN, Yeterian EH (1990) Prefrontal cortex in relation to other cortical areas in rhesus monkey: architecture and connections. In: Uylings HBM, Van Eden CG, De Bruin JPC, Corner MA, Feenstra MPG (eds) Progress in Brain Research, vol 85, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 63–94
Spiegler BJ, Mishkin M (1981) Evidence for the sequential participation of the inferior tempeoral cortex and amygdala in the acquisition of stimulus-reward associations. Behav Brain Res 3:303–317
Allman J, Brothers L (1994) Faces, fear and amygdala. Nature 372:613–614
Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio A (1994) Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following damage to the human amygdala. Nature 372:669–672.
Romanski LM, LeDoux JE (1992) Equipotentiality of thalamoamygdala and thalamo-cortico-amygdala circuits in auditory fear conditioning. J Neurosci 12:4501–4509
Rodman HR (1994) Development of inferotemporal cortex in the monkey. Cerebral Cortex 5:484–498
Amaral DG, Price JL, Pitkaenen A, Carmichael ST (1992) Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In: Aggleton JP (ed) The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction. Wiley-Liss. New York, pp 1–66
Iwai E, Yukie M (1987) Amygdalofugal and amygdalopetal connections with modality-specific visual cortical areas in macaques (Macaca fuscata, M. mulatta, andM. fascicularis) J Comp Neurol 261:362–387
LeDoux JE (1993) Emotional memory systems in the brain. Behav Brain Res 58:69–79
Steele GE, Weller RE (1993) Subcortical connections of subdivisions of inferior temporal cortex in squirrel monkeys. Visual Neurosci 10:563–583
Weinberger NM (1993) Learning-induced changes of auditory receptive fields. Curr Opinion Neurobiol 3:570–577
Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Bream P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit Psychol 8:382–439
Cavanagh P (1991) What's up in top-down processing? In: Gorea A (ed) Representations of vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 295–304
Picton TW, Stuss DT (1994) Neurobiology of conscious experience. Curr Opinion Neurobiol 4:256–265
Koerner E (1994) Autonomous, recognition and selforganization of knowledge representation in neural networks. Part 1. From structuring data to constraint generation by self-referential control. Holonics 4:3–34
Celebrini S, Thorpe S, Trotter Y, Imbert M (1993) Dynamics of orientation coding in area V1 of the awake primate. Visual Neurosci 10:811–825
Oram MW, Perrett DI (1992) Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and the head. J Neurophysiol 68:70–84
Dinse HR (1994) A time-based approach towards cortical functions: neural mechanisms underlying dynamic aspects of information processing before and after postontogenetic plastic processes. Physica D, 75:129–150
Freeman RD (1995) Space and time in the central visual pathway. Proceedings 5th International Symposium on Bioelectronic and Molecular Electronic Devices, Okinawa, Japan, November 28–30 B1-01, pp 1–4
Koener E, Tsujino H, Masutani T (1997) A cortical-type modular neural network for hypothetical reasoning. Neural Networks 10:791–814
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Koerner, E., Matsumoto, G. Cortical architecture and self-referential control for brain-like processing in artificial neural systems. Artificial Life and Robotics 2, 170–178 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471177
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471177