Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The representation of biological systems from the standpoint of the theory of categories

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mathematical framework for a rigorous theory of general systems is constructed, using the notions of the theory of Categories and Functors introduced by Eilenberg and MacLane (1945,Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,58, 231–94). A short discussion of the basic ideas is given, and their possible application to the theory of biological systems is discussed. On the basis of these considerations, a number of results are proved, including the possibility of selecting a unique representative (a “canonical form”) from a family of mathematical objects, all of which represent the same system. As an example, the representation of the neural net and the finite automaton is constructed in terms of our general theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Chevalley, C. 1956.Fundamental Concepts of Algebra. New York: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eilenberg, S. 1957.Categories and Fiber Bundles. Mimeographed Lecture Notes, (Unpublished, The University of Chicago.)

  • Eilenberg, S. and S. MacLane. 1945. “General Theory of Natural Equivalences”,Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 58, 231–94.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C. 1955. “Representation of Events in Nerve Nets”, Automata Studies, Annals of Mathematics Studies, #34, 3–41. (Ed. C. E. Shannon and J. McCarthy.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W. and W. Pitts. 1943. “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,10, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. von 1951. “The General and Logical Theory of Automata”.Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (Ed. Lloyd A. Jeffress.) New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1955. “Probabilistic Logics and the Synthesis of Reliable Organisms From Unreliable Components”.Automata Studies, Annals of Mathematics Studies, #34 43–98. (Ed. C. E. Shannon and J. McCarthy.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1954. “Topology and Life”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,16, 317–48.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. 1958. “A Relational Theory of Biological Systems”.Bull. Math. Biophysics,20, 245–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Committee on Mathematical Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA

    Robert Rosen

Authors
  1. Robert Rosen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, R. The representation of biological systems from the standpoint of the theory of categories. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 20, 317–341 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477890

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477890

Keywords

Search

Navigation