Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Adaptive communication among collaborative agents: preliminary results with symbol grounding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication among adaptive agents can be framed as language acquisition and broken down into three problems; symbol grounding, language learning, and language evolution. We propose that this view clarifies many of the difficulties framing issues of collaboration and self-organization. Additionally, we demonstrate simple classification systems that can provide the first step in grounding real-world data and provide general schema for constructing other such systems. The first system classifies auditory input from frog calls and is presented as a model of grounding objects. The second system uses the minimum description length framework to distinguish patterns of robot movement as a model of grounding actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Wee K, Collier T, Kobele G, et al. (2001) Natural language interface to an intrusion detection system. Proceedings, International Conference on Control, Automation, and Systems. ICCAS

  2. Hamad S (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42: 335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siskind JM (1996) A computational study of cross-situational techniques for learning word-to-meaning mappings. Cognition 61:39–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gold EM (1967) Language identification in the limit. Inform Control 10:447–474

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Angluin D (1982) Inference of reversible languages. J Assoc Comput Mach 29:741–765

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanazawa M (1996) Identification in the limit of categorial grammars. J Logic Lang Inform 5:115–155

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Denis F (2001) Learning regular languages from simple positive examples. Mach Learn 44:37–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Stabler EP (1998) Acquiring grammars with movement. Syntax 1: 72–97

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stabler EP (2002) Identifying minimalist languages from dependency structures. Presentation available at http://taylor0.biology. ucla.edu/al/publication/main.html#presentatiions, 2002.cited on 13 September, 2004

  10. Komarova N, Niyogi P, Nowak M (2001) Evolutionary dynamics of grammar acquisition. J Theor Biol 209:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steels L (2001) Self-organising vocabularies. IEEE Intell syst: 16–23

  12. Kirby S (2001) Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Tran Evolut Comput 5:102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliphant M (1996) The dilemma of saussurean communication. BioSystems 37:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vapnik VN (2000) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Vitányi P, Li M (1997) On prediction by data compression. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Machine Learning, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. 1224:14–30

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vitányi P, Li M (2000) Minimum description length induction, Bayesianism, and Kolmogorov complexity. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, IT-46:446–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang H, Elson J, Girod L, et al. (2003) Target classification and localization in a habitat-monitoring application. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, (ICASSP 103). 4:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang H, Yip L, Maniezzo D, et al. (2002) A wireless time-synchronized cots sensor platform part ii: applications to beamforming. Proceedings of the IEEE CAS Workshop on Wireless Communications and Networking, Pasadena, California, Sept. 5–6, 2002

  19. Marty C, Gaucher P (1999) Sound guide to the tailless amphibians of French Guiana. Compact disc, Centre Bioacoustique Alpin, Mens

  20. Rabiner L, Juang B-H (1993) Fundamentals of speech recognition. Prentice Hall Englewood Clifis, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mumford D (1996) Pattern theory: a unifying perspective. In: Knill DC, Richards W (eds) Perception as Bayesian inference. CUP, NY

  22. Brent MR, Cartwright TA (1996) Lexical categorization: fitting template grammars by incremental MDL optimization. In: Micla L, de la Higuera C (eds) Grammatical inference: learning syntax from sentences. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 84–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Rissanen J, Ristad E (1994) Language acquistion in the MDL framework. In: Ristad E. (ed) Language computations. American Mathematical Society, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grüunwald P (1996) A minimum description length approach to grammar inference. In: Wermter GSS, Riloff E (eds) Symbolic, connectionist and statistical approaches to learning for natural language processing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldsmith J (2001) Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational Linguistics 27:153–198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Teal TK, Albro D, Stabler E, et al. (1999) Compression and adaptation. In European Conference on Artificial Life, ECAL’99

  27. Kolmogorov A (1968) Three approaches to the definition of the concept ‘amount of information’. Selected Translations in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 7:293–302

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Soklakov AN (2001) Complexity analysis for algorithmically simple strings. arXiv.org e-Print archive, Available at http:// arxiv.org/list/cs/0009

  29. Teal TK, Taylor CE (2000) Effects of acquisition on language evolution. Artif Life 6:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Taylor.

Additional information

This work was presented, in part, at the 8th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita, Japan, January 24#x2013;26, 2003

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Collier, T., Taylor, C. et al. Adaptive communication among collaborative agents: preliminary results with symbol grounding. Artif Life Robotics 8, 127–132 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-004-0299-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-004-0299-3

Key words