Abstract
This dialogue concerns the nature of ethical responsibility in contemporary art practice, and its relation to questions of creativity; the role of writing in shaping the perception of transgenic art and related practices; and the problems that may be associated with trusting artists to act with integrity in the unchartered waters of their enthusiastic engagement with genetic technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abram D (1997) The spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. Vintage, NY
Davies G (2003) Editorial: a geography of monsters? Geoforum 34
Gigliotti C (2006) Leonardo’s choice: the ethics of artists working with genetic technologies. AI Soc 20.1
Griffin D (1992) Animal minds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Guattari F (1995) Chaosmosis. Power Pubications, Sydney
Haraway D (1991) Manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York
Haraway D (1995) Foreword. In: Hables-Gray (ed) The cyborg handbook. Routledge, New York
Kroker A (2004) The Transgenic Art of Telebody. http://www.telebody.ws/KrokerOnTELEBODY2.doc
Wheale N (ed) (1995) The postmodern arts. Routledge, London, New York
Wright R (2004) A short history of progress CBC Massey lecture series. Anasi Press, Toronto
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, S., Gigliotti, C. We have always been transgenic. AI & Soc 20, 35–48 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0001-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0001-x