Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

An experimental investigation into the dimensional error of powder-binder three-dimensional printing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an experimental investigation into the dimensional error of the rapid prototyping additive process of powder-binder three-dimensional printing. Ten replicates of a purpose-designed part were produced using a three-dimensional printer, and measurements of the internal and external features of all surfaces were made using a general purpose coordinate measuring machine. The results reveal that the bases of all replicates (nominally flat) have a concave curvature, producing a flatness error of the primary datum. This is in contrast to findings regarding other three-dimensional printing processes, widely reported in the literature, where a convex curvature was observed. All external surfaces investigated in this study showed positive deviation from nominal values, especially in the z-axis. The z-axis error consisted of a consistent positive cumulative error and a different constant error in different replicates. By compensating for datum surface error, the average total height error of the test parts can be reduced by 25.52 %. All the dimensional errors are hypothesised to be explained by expansion and the subsequent distortion caused by layer interaction during and after the printing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Printing of the Paper, MITnews, http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2011/3d-printing-0914, September 14, 2011, (accessed on 10/06/2015)

  2. 3D printing, http://3dprinting.com/what-is-3d-printing/ (accessed on 10/06/2015)

  3. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies, chapter 8. Binder jetting, 2nd ed. ISBN 978-1-4939-2112-6, New York: Springer Science and Business Media

  4. Levy GN, Schindel R, Kruth JP (2003) Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(2):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berman B (2012) 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 55(2):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kruth JP, Leu MC, Nakagawa T (1998) Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 47(2):525–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SJ, Sachs E, Cima M (1995) Layer position accuracy in powder-based rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyp J 1(4):24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Relvas C, Ramos A, Completo A, Simões JA (2012) A systematic approach for an accuracy level using rapid prototyping technologies. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226(12):2023–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Melchels FP, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials 31(24):6121–6130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan X, Gu PENG (1996) A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems. Comput Aided Des 28(4):307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni P, Marsan A, Dutta D (2000) A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 6(1):18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong X, Anderson T, Chou K (2014) Review on powder-based electron beam additive manufacturing technology. Manuf Rev 1:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Senthilkumaran K, Pandey PM, Rao PVM (2009) New model for shrinkage compensation in selective laser sintering. Virtual Phys Prototyp 4(2):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raghunath N, Pandey PM (2007) Improving accuracy through shrinkage modelling by using Taguchi method in selective laser sintering. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(6):985–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh S, Sharma VS, Sachdeva A (2012) Optimization and analysis of shrinkage in selective laser sintered polyamide parts. Mater Manuf Process 27(6):707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang HJ, Hwang PJ, Lee SH (2002) A study on shrinkage compensation of the SLS process by using the Taguchi method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(11):1203–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Soe SP (2012) Quantitative analysis on SLS part curling using EOS P700 machine. J Mater Process Technol 212(11):2433–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Masood SH, Rattanawong W (2002) A generic part orientation system based on volumetric error in rapid prototyping. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(3):209–216

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang TM, Xi JT, Jin Y (2007) A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(11–12):1087–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Chou K (2008) A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 222(8):959–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang DY, Huang BH (2011) Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modeling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(9–12):1027–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong K, Joshi S, Amine Lehtihet E (2008) Error compensation for fused deposition modeling (FDM) machine by correcting slice files. Rapid Prototyp J 14(1):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Mater Des 30(10):4243–4252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee SH, Park WS, Cho HS, Zhang W, Leu MC (2001) A neural network approach to the modelling and analysis of stereolithography processes. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 215(12):1719–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang YM, Lan HY (2005) Dynamic reverse compensation to increase the accuracy of the rapid prototyping system. J Mater Process Technol 167(2):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou JG, Herscovici D, Chen CC (2000) Parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped stereolithography parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(3):363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pham D, Ji C (2000) Design for stereolithography. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 214(5):635–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jayanthi S, Keefe M, Gargiulo EP (1994) Studies in stereolithography: influence of process parameters on curl distortion in photopolymer models. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 1994 (pp. 250–258). University of Texas, Austin

  29. Dimitrov D, Van Wijck W, Schreve K, De Beer N (2006) Investigating the achievable accuracy of three dimensional printing. Rapid Prototyp J 12(1):42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ollison T, Berisso K (2010) Three-dimensional printing build variables that impact cylindricity. J Ind Technol 26(1):2–10

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hsu TJ, Lai WH (2010) Manufacturing parts optimization in the three‐dimensional printing process by the Taguchi method. J Chin Inst Eng 33(1):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Suwanprateeb J, Thammarakcharoen F, Wasoontararat K, Suvannapruk W (2012) Influence of printing parameters on the transformation efficiency of 3D-printed plaster of Paris to hydroxyapatite and its properties. Rapid Prototyp J 18(6):490–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Islam MN, Boswell B, Pramanik A (2013) An investigation of dimensional accuracy of parts produced by three-dimensional printing. Proc World Congr Eng 1:3–5

  34. Liu W, Li L, Kochhar AK (1998) A method for assessing geometrical errors in layered manufacturing. Part 2: mathematical modelling and numerical evaluation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14(9):644–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cooke AL, Soons JA (2010) Variability in the geometric accuracy of additively manufactured test parts. In 21st annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, Texas, USA pp. 1–12

  36. 3D Systems, Z Printer 450: Technical Specifications, http://www.zcorp.com/en/Products/3D-Printers/ZPrinter-450/Technical- Specifications154/ spage.aspx (accessed on 10/06/2015)

  37. Mahler DB, Ady AB (1960) An explanation for the hygroscopic setting expansion of dental gypsum products. J Dent Res 39:578–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Michalakis KX, Stratos A, Hirayama H, Pissiotis AL, Touloumi F (2009) Delayed setting and hygroscopic linear expansion of three gypsum products used for cast articulation. J Prosthet Dent 102(5):313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bjørke Ø (1989) Computer-aided tolerancing. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York

  40. Farmer LE (1999) Dimensioning and tolerancing for function and economic manufacture. Blue Publ, Sydney

  41. Islam MN (1995) A CMM-based geometric accuracy study of CNC end milling operations. In Proceedings of 6th Int. Conference on Manufacturing Engineering, Melbourne, 835–842

  42. Islam MN, Rafai NH, and Subramaniam SS (2011) Dimensional accuracy achievable in wire-cut electrical discharge machining. In: Electronic Engineering and Applied Computing, Ao, S-L. and Gelman, L. (Eds) Lecture Notes on Electrical Engineering 90, Chapter 43, Springer, Netherlands, 543–553

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. N. Islam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M.N., Sacks, S. An experimental investigation into the dimensional error of powder-binder three-dimensional printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82, 1371–1380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7482-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7482-7

Keywords