Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Cooperative enhancement of multi-material interface strength by mechanical interlocking structures and FDM path planning

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-material additive manufacturing (MMAM) significantly enhances the design flexibility and performance diversity of manufacturing by integrating materials with different characteristics into a single object. However, augmenting the interface strength of MMAM parts is a crucial step in ensuring the overall quality and performance of the components. In this study, we propose a strategy that combines mechanical interlocking structures with FDM path planning to enhance interface strength. To achieve this goal, we designed three mechanical interlocking structures: Dovetail, Hook, and Cross. These structures not only meet the requirements of continuous extrusion processes but also exhibit non-disassemblable characteristics. Taking into account their slicing profiles and the characteristics of their fracture forms, the interface strength was further enhanced during the forming process by adjusting the nozzle’s movement path and controlling the extrusion amount of consumables. The experimental results indicate that, with a layer count of 5 and an embedding distance of 4 mm, all three mechanical interlocking structures exhibit superior tensile performance. Under the collaborative action of path stitching, the interface strength of the three mechanical interlocking structures is enhanced, the Dovetail structure demonstrates a notably superior performance among them, showcasing an average strength limit increase of 304.09% (8.89 MPa). The experimental results not only validate the enhancement of interface strength through the combination of mechanical interlocking structures and FDM path planning but also reveal the relationship between strength limits and contact area. The varied patterns in strength limits resulting from different approaches to increasing the contact area of the two materials provide insights for investigating other structural parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muguruza A, Bo JB, Gómez A, Minguella-Canela J, Fernandes J, Ramos F, Xuriguera E, Varea A, Cirera A (2017) Development of a multi-material additive manufacturing process for electronic devices. Procedia Manuf 13:746–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei C, Sun Z, Chen Q, Liu Z, Li L (2019) Additive manufacturing of horizontal and 3D functionally graded 316L/Cu10Sn components via multiple material selective laser melting. J Manuf Sci Eng 141:081014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, Lewis JA (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:3179–3184. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521342113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goh GL, Zhang H, Chong TH, Yeong WY (2021) 3D printing of multilayered and multimaterial electronics: a review. Adv Elect Mater 7:2100445. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202100445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sears N, Dhavalikar P, Whitely M, Cosgriff-Hernandez E (2017) Fabrication of biomimetic bone grafts with multi-material 3D printing. Biofabrication 9:025020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bijadi S, De Bruijn E, Tempelman EY, Oberdorf J (2017) Application of multi-material 3D printing for improved functionality and modularity of open source low-cost prosthetics: a case study. 2017 Design of Medical Devices Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers V001T10A003. https://doi.org/10.1115/DMD2017-3540

  7. Zhu M, Mori Y, Wakayama T, Wada A, Kawamura S (2019) A fully multi-material three-dimensional printed soft gripper with variable stiffness for robust grasping. Soft Rob 6:507–519. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2018.0112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haleem A, Javaid M (2020) 3D printed medical parts with different materials using additive manufacturing. Clin Epidemiol Global Health 8:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Magnus C (2012) Feasibility study of metal to polymer hybrid joining. Lappeenranta University of Technology. https://lutpub.lut.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/77099/carl.pdf?sequence=1

  10. Mogali SR, Yeong WY, Tan HKJ, Tan GJS, Abrahams PH, Zary N, Low-Beer N, Ferenczi MA (2018) Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education. Anat Sci Ed 11:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang H, Lim JC, Liu Y, Qi X, Yap YL, Dikshit V, Yeong WY, Wei J (2017) Performance evaluation of ProJet multi-material jetting 3D printer. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1242915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz JJ, Boydston AJ (2019) Multimaterial actinic spatial control 3D and 4D printing. Nat Commun 10:791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08639-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Terrazas CA, Gaytan SM, Rodriguez E, Espalin D, Murr LE, Medina F, Wicker RB (2014) Multi-material metallic structure fabrication using electron beam melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5449-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J, Guo Y, Weng C, Zhang H, Zhang Z (2020) High thermal conductive epoxy based composites fabricated by multi-material direct ink writing. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 129:105684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neely KE, Galloway KC, Strauss AM (2020) Multi-material additively manufactured composite reactive materials via continuous filament direct ink writing. Addit Manuf 35:101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cadiou T, Demoly F, Gomes S (2021) A hybrid additive manufacturing platform based on fused filament fabrication and direct ink writing techniques for multi-material 3D printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:3551–3562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06891-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kennedy ZC, Christ JF (2020) Printing polymer blends through in situ active mixing during fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf 36:101233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirth JA (2016) The design and prototyping of complex compliant mechanisms via multi-material additive manufacturing techniques. Volume 5A: 40th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers V05AT07A003. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59078

  19. Arifvianto B, Satiti BE, Salim UA, Suyitno, Nuryanti A, Mahardika M (2022) Mechanical properties of the FFF sandwich-structured parts made of PLA/TPU multi-material. Prog Addit Manuf 7:1213–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00295-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsuzaki R, Kanatani T, Todoroki A (2019) Multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers and metals using fused filament fabrication and electroforming. Addit Manuf 29:100812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasanov S, Alkunte S, Rajeshirke M, Gupta A, Huseynov O, Fidan I, Alifui-Segbaya F, Rennie A (2021) Review on additive manufacturing of multi-material parts: progress and challenges. JMMP 6:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp6010004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lumpe TS, Mueller J, Shea K (2019) Tensile properties of multi-material interfaces in 3D printed parts. Mater Des 162:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li L, Sun Q, Bellehumeur C, Gu P (2022) Investigation of bond formation in FDM process. Int Solid Freeform Fabr Symp https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/4500

  24. Pollard D, Ward C, Herrmann G, Etches J (2017) Filament temperature dynamics in fused deposition modelling and outlook for control. Procedia Manuf 11:536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P (2003) Experimental study of the cooling characteristics of polymer filaments in FDM and impact on the mesostructures and properties of prototypes. Int Solid Freeform Fabr Symp. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/5566

  26. Vanaei HR, Raissi K, Deligant M, Shirinbayan M, Fitoussi J, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A (2020) Toward the understanding of temperature effect on bonding strength, dimensions and geometry of 3D-printed parts. J Mater Sci 55:14677–14689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05057-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verma S, Yang C-K, Lin C-H, Jeng JY (2022) Additive manufacturing of lattice structures for high strength mechanical interlocking of metal and resin during injection molding. Addit Manuf 49:102463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kakaraparthi S, Tatara RA, Chen N (2022) A new boundary interlock geometry design pattern to strengthen FDM part multi-material interface. Manuf Lett 33:664–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.07.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding Y, Jiang H, Dunn ML, Yu K (2024) 3D interfacial material-locking structures to promote bonding strength of dissimilar materials. J Manuf Process 112:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.01.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ribeiro M, Sousa Carneiro O, Ferreira Da Silva A (2019) Interface geometries in 3D multi-material prints by fused filament fabrication. RPJ 25:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2017-0107

  31. Kuipers T, Su R, Wu J, Wang CCL (2022) ITIL: interlaced topologically interlocking lattice for continuous dual-material extrusion. Addit Manuf 50:102495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu M, Zhang F, Chen X (2020) Bioinspired mechanically interlocking structures. Small Struct 1:2000045. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202000045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Porter MM, Ravikumar N, Barthelat F, Martini R (2017) 3D-printing and mechanics of bio-inspired articulated and multi-material structures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 73:114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mustafa I, Kwok T (2022) Interlacing infills for multi-material fused filament fabrication using layered depth material images. Micromachines 13:773. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Willmott JD, Bibb RJ, Johnson AA, Paterson AM (2023) Three-dimension dithering and its effect on the interfacial strength of multi-material and emulated multi-material additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 78:103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kwon N, Deshpande H, Hasan MK, Darnal A, Kim J (2021) Multi-ttach: techniques to enhance multi-material attachments in low-cost FDM 3D printing. Symposium on Computational Fabrication, Virtual Event USA: ACM 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485114.3485116

  37. Kim S, Andreu A, Kim I, Kim J-H, Lee J, Yoon Y-J (2022) Continuously varied infill pattern (ConVIP): improvement of mechanical properties and printing speed of fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing. J Market Res 18:1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang T, Li N, Link G, Jelonnek J, Fleischer J, Dittus J, Kupzik D (2021) Load-dependent path planning method for 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced plastics. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 140:106181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Q, Zhang Z, Yavas D, Shen W, Wu D (2023) Multi-material additive manufacturing: effect of process parameters on flexural behavior of soft-hard sandwich beams. RPJ 29:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2022-0231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tamburrino F, Graziosi S, Bordegoni M (2019) The influence of slicing parameters on the multi-material adhesion mechanisms of FDM printed parts: an exploratory study. Virtual Phys Prototyp 14:316–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.1607758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vu IQ, Bass LB, Williams CB, Dillard DA (2018) Characterizing the effect of print orientation on interface integrity of multi-material jetting additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 22:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52175230), the Pilot Project of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2020H0015), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2022J011427).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Bin Liu: investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition. Youxin Xu: data curation, methodology, visualization, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. Wei Cao: investigation, software, validation, writing—original draft. Ping Lu: writing—review and editing, formal analysis, supervision. Chenghuan Huang: conceptualization, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Based on the mortise-and-tenon structure of ancient buildings and the biological interlocking mechanism, three mechanical interlocking structures have been designed. They contribute to the improvement of the strength of interfaces with multiple materials.

• Proposed a strategy that combines FDM path planning with interlocking structures, making full use of the characteristics of additive manufacturing for layer-by-layer accumulation. Tailored to the specific characteristics of the slicing contours and failure modes of different mechanical interlocking structures, this strategy achieves a secondary enhancement of the strength of interfaces with multiple materials.

• Explored the relationship between mechanical performance and contact area, observing distinct patterns in the variation of mechanical properties with different methods of altering the contact area.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Xu, Y., Cao, W. et al. Cooperative enhancement of multi-material interface strength by mechanical interlocking structures and FDM path planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 134, 4099–4115 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14398-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14398-7

Keywords