Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct touch finger interaction on a smartphone or a tablet is now ubiquitous. However, the latency inherent in digital computation produces an average feedback delay of ~ 75 ms between the action of the hand and its visible effect on digital content. This delay has been shown to affect users’ performance, but it is unclear whether users adapt to this delay and whether it influences skill learning. Previous work studied adaptation to feedback delays but only for longer delays, with hidden hand or indirect devices. This paper addresses adaptation to touchscreen delay in two empirical studies involving the tracking of a target moving along an elliptical path. Participants were trained for the task either at the minimal delay the system allows (~ 9 ms) or at a longer delay equivalent to commercialized touch devices latencies (75 ms). After 10 training sessions over a minimum of 2 weeks (Experiment 1), participants adapt to the delay. They also display long-term retention 7 weeks after the last training session. This adaptation generalizes to a similar tracking path (e.g., infinity symbol). We also observed generalization of learning from the longer delay to the minimal-delay condition (Experiment 2). The delay thus does not prevent the learning of tracking skill, which suggests that delay adaptation and tracking skill could be two separate components of learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bérard F, Blanch R (2013) Two touch system latency estimators: high accuracy and low overhead. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 241–250

  • Bérard F, Rochet-Capellan A (2015) The transfer of learning as HCI similarity: towards an objective assessment of the sensory-motor basis of naturalness. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1315–1324

  • Botzer L, Karniel A (2013) Feedback and feedforward adaptation to visuomotor delay during reaching and slicing movements. Eur J Neurosci 38(1):2108–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cámara C, de la Malla C, López-Moliner J, Brenner E (2018) Eye movements in interception with delayed visual feedback. Exp Brain Res 236(7):1837–1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattan E, Rochet-Capellan A, Perrier P, Bérard F (2015) Reducing latency with a continuous prediction: effects on users’ performance in direct-touch target acquisitions. In: Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on interactive tabletops & surfaces, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 205–214

  • Cattan E, Rochet-Capellan A, Perrier P, Bérard F (2017) Does practice make perfect? In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp 5619–5629), ACM, New York, NY, USA

  • Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R (2008) Consolidation patterns of human motor memory. J Neurosci 28(39):9610–9618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham DW, Billock VA, Tsou BH (2001a) Sensorimotor adaptation to violations of temporal contiguity. Psychol Sci 12(6):532–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham DW, Chatziastros A, Von der Heyde M, Bülthoff HH (2001b) Driving in the future: temporal visuomotor adaptation and generalization. J Vis 1(2):88–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de la Malla C, López-Moliner J, Brenner E (2014) Dealing with delays does not transfer across sensorimotor tasks. J Vis 14(12):8, 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes AJMC, Miall RC (2000) Adaptation to visual feedback delays in a human manual tracking task. Exp Brain Res 131(1):101–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50(3):346–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jota R, Ng A, Dietz P, Wigdor D (2013) How fast is fast enough?: a study of the effects of latency in direct-touch pointing tasks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 2291–2300

  • Kennedy JS, Buehner MJ, Rushton SK (2009) Adaptation to sensory-motor temporal misalignment: instrumental or perceptual learning? Q J Exp Psychol 62(3):453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitago T, Ryan SL, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW, Haith AM (2013) Unlearning versus savings in visuomotor adaptation: comparing effects of washout, passage of time, and removal of errors on motor memory. Front Hum Neurosci 7:307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P (2011) Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21(4):636–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leib R, Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2017) The mechanical representation of temporal delays. Sci Rep 7(1):7669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Jackson JK (2006) Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action. Exp Brain Res 172(1):77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mundry R, Nunn CL (2009) Stepwise model fitting and statistical inference: turning noise into signal pollution. Am Nat 173(1):119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng A, Lepinski J, Wigdor D, Sanders S, Dietz P (2012) Designing for low-latency direct-touch input. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 453–464

  • Norman DA (2010) The transmedia design challenge: technology that is pleasurable and satisfying. Interactions 17(1):12–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2007) Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version. 3: 57. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (ISBN 3-900051-07-0)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde M, Ernst MO (2016) Time, agency, and sensory feedback delays during action. Curr Opin Behav Sci 8:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde M, van Dam LC, Ernst MO (2014) Predictability is necessary for closed-loop visual feedback delay adaptation. J Vis 14(3):4, 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarlegna FR, Baud-Bovy G, Danion F (2010) Delayed visual feedback affects both manual tracking and grip force control when transporting a handheld object. J Neurophysiol 104(2):641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW (2010) Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33:89–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol, 4(6):e179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetson C, Cui X, Montague PR, Eagleman DM (2006) Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron 51(5):651–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugano Y, Keetels M, Vroomen J (2012) The build-up and transfer of sensorimotor temporal recalibration measured via a synchronization task. Front Psychol 3:246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telgen S, Parvin D, Diedrichsen J (2014) Mirror reversal and visual rotation are learned and consolidated via separate mechanisms: recalibrating or learning de novo? J Neurosci 34(41):13768–13779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turnham EJA, Braun DA, Wolpert DM (2011) Inferring visuomotor priors for sensorimotor learning. PLoS Comput Biol 7(3):e1001112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Terzuolo C (1982) Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience 7(2):431–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Campadelli P, Mounoud P (1987) Visuo-manual pursuit tracking of human two-dimensional movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13(1):62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Helmholtz H (1867) Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. In: Gustav Karsten (ed) Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Physik, vol 9. Leopold Voss, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei K, Yan X, Kong G, Yin C, Zhang F, Wang Q, Kording KP (2014) Computer use changes generalization of movement learning. Curr Biol 24(1):82–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wigdor D, Wixon D (2011) Brave NUI world: designing natural user interfaces for touch and gesture. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the LabEx PERSYVAL-Lab (ANR-11-LABX-0025-01). This work is based on an earlier work: “Does Practice Make Perfect? Learning to Deal with Latency in Direct-Touch Interaction”, in CHI 2017© ACM, https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025585. The authors also thank Linda Sherwood for her careful proofreading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amélie Rochet-Capellan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cattan, E., Perrier, P., Bérard, F. et al. Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision. Exp Brain Res 236, 3191–3201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5368-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5368-2

Keywords