Abstract
The study was conducted to evaluate surge irrigation against continuous irrigation in terms of irrigation and water use efficiencies to produce onion. It was carried out at Mekelle Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia on 70 m long and 0.6 m center–center spacing furrows of 0.26% average slope on a clay soil. The treatments consisted of factorial combination of two discharges (Q 1 = 1 l/s and Q 2 = 2 l/s) and three-cycle ratios (CR1 = 1/3, CR2 = 1/2, and C = 1 for continuous irrigation). Surge flow treatments advanced faster than the respective continuous flow treatments with surge flow treatment SF21 being the fastest. The best value of application efficiency (60%) was achieved for SF11 and the least (46%) for CF2. The maximum (87%) and minimum (68%) values of distribution uniformity were obtained for cycle ratios CR1 and C, respectively. Storage efficiency was highest (89%) for CF2 and lowest (78%) for SF12. Onion yield was significantly affected (p < 0.05) by the interaction effect, the highest (14,400 kg/ha) and the lowest (13,363 kg/ha) yields were obtained for SF11 and SF21, respectively. The maximum irrigation water use efficiency (2.27 kg/m3) was observed for SF11 and the minimum (1.68 kg/m3) for CF2. Surge irrigation was found to be a promising irrigation practice for onion production in the study area as it saves water, reduces irrigation period, and increases the crop yield.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper number 56. FAO, Rome
Amer MH (1998) Surge flow irrigation as a farm practice for cotton production. Zagazing J Agric Res 25(4):659–669
Cuenca RH (1989) Irrigation system design: an engineering approach. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper number 24. FAO, Rome
Horst MG, Shamutalov SS, Goncalves JM, Pereira LL (2007) Assessing impacts of surge flow irrigation on water saving and productivity of cotton. Agric Water Manage 87:115–127
Ismail SM (2003) Surge flow irrigation: field experiments under short field conditions in Egypt. Workshop on improved irrigation technologies and methods: R&D and testing. In: Proceedings of the 54th executive council of ICID and 20th European regional conference, Montpellier, France, 14–19 September
Ismail SM, Depewege H (2005) Water productivity and crop production simulation under surge flow irrigation in short furrows in Egypt. Irrig Drain 54:103–113
Ismail SM (2006) Effect of tillage on water advance and distribution under surge and continuous furrows irrigation methods for cotton in Egypt. Irrig Drain 55:191–199
Ismail SM, Depewege H, Schultz B (2004) Surge flow irrigation under short field conditions in Egypt. Irrig Drain 53:461–475
Jalali–Farahani HR, Duke, Heermann DF (1993a) Physics of surge irrigation: quantifying soil physical parameters. Transac ASAE 36(1):37–44
Kanber R, Koksal H, Onder S, Kapur S, Sahan S (2001) Comparison of surge and continuous furrow methods for cotton in the Harran plain. Agric Water Manage 47:119–135
Latif M, Ittfaq M (1998) Performance of surge and continuous furrow irrigations. Rural Environ Eng 34(2):35–42
Mahmood S, Kahan MA, Latif M, Sial JK (2003) Application of surge irrigation on borders for water saving and wheat production: first year study result. Ital J Agron 7(1):49–55
Mintesinot B (2002) Assessment and optimization of traditional vertisol irrigation in Northern Ethiopia: a case study at Gumselasa microdam using maize as an indicator crop. PhD dissertation, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium, 202p
Rogers DH, Sothers MW (1995) Surge irrigation. Irrigation water management series, cooperative extension service. Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA
Saleh A, Hanks RJ (1989) Field evaluation of soil hydraulic property changes caused by surge water application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53(3):1526–1530
Stringham GE, Keller J (1979) Surge flow automatic irrigation. In: Proceedings of the ASCE, irrigation and drainage division specialty conference, Albuquerqque, NM: 132–142.
Walker WR, Skogerboe GV (eds) (1987) Surface irrigation: theory and practice. Prince-Hall, Engelwood Cliff, pp 212–234
Yonts CD, Eisenhauer DE, Fekersilassie D (1996) Impact of surge irrigation on furrow water advance. Transac ASAE 39(1):973–979
Yonts CD, Cahoon JE, Eisenhauer DE, Wertz K (1994) Surge irrigation. Irrigation series, Nebraska cooperative extension. Electronic version issued July 1995
Zaghloul MA (1988) Wheat response to surge irrigation. Misr J Agric Eng 5(2):13–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Ayars.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kifle, M., Tilahun, K. & Yazew, E. Evaluation of surge flow furrow irrigation for onion production in a semiarid region of Ethiopia. Irrig Sci 26, 325–333 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0096-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0096-6