Abstract
We present a robust optimization approach to portfolio management under uncertainty that builds upon insights gained from the well-known Lognormal model for stock prices, while addressing the model’s limitations, in particular, the issue of fat tails being underestimated in the Gaussian framework and the active debate on the correct distribution to use. Our approach, which we call Log-robust in the spirit of the Lognormal model, does not require any probabilistic assumption, and incorporates the randomness on the continuously compounded rates of return by using range forecasts and a budget of uncertainty, thus capturing the decision-maker’s degree of risk aversion through a single, intuitive parameter. Our objective is to maximize the worst-case portfolio value (over a set of allowable deviations of the uncertain parameters from their nominal values) at the end of the time horizon in a one-period setting; short sales are not allowed. We formulate the robust problem as a linear programming problem and derive theoretical insights into the worst-case uncertainty and the optimal allocation. We then compare in numerical experiments the Log-robust approach with the traditional robust approach, where range forecasts are applied directly to the stock returns. Our results indicate that the Log-robust approach significantly outperforms the benchmark with respect to 95 or 99% Value-at-Risk. This is because the traditional robust approach leads to portfolios that are far less diversified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al Najjab M, Thiele A (2007) The Log-Logistic option pricing model. Technical report. Lehigh University, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bethlehem
Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions to uncertain programs. Oper Res Lett 25: 1–13
Ben-Tal A, Boyd S, Nemirovski A (2006) Extending scope of robust optimization: comprehensive robust counterparts of uncertain problems. Math Prog B 107: 63–89
Bertsekas D (1999) Nonlinear programming 2nd edn. Athena Scientific, Belmont
Bertsimas D, Pachamanova D (2008) Robust multiperiod portfolio management with transaction costs. Comput Oper Res 35(1): 3–17
Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52(1): 35–53
Bertsimas D, Thiele A (2006) Robust and data-driven optimization: modern decision-making under uncertainty, chap 4. INFORMS Tutorials in Operations Research
Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81: 637–659
Blattberg R, Gonedes N (1974) A comparison of the stable and student distributions as statistical models for stock prices. J Bus 47: 244–280
Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chopra V, Ziemba W (1993) The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. J Portf Manag 19: 6–11
Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns—stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant Finance 1(2): 223–236
Erdogan E, Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2004) Robust portfolio management. Technical report. Columbia University, Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, New York
Fabozzi F, Kolm P, Pachamanova D, Focardi S (2007) Robust portfolio optimization and management. Wiley, London
Fama E (1965) The behavior of stock prices. J Bus 38: 34–105
Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2003) Robust portfolio selection problems. Math Oper Res 28: 1–38
Hull JC (2002) Options, futures and other derivatives, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall
Jansen D, deVries C (1991) On the frequency of large stock returns—putting booms and busts into perspective. Rev Econ Stat 73(1): 18–24
Kon S (1984) Models of stock returns—a comparison. J Finance 39: 147–165
Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. Wiley, New York
Pachamanova D (2006) Handling parameter uncertainty in portfolio risk minimization. J Portf Manag 32(4): 70–78
Richardson M, Smith T (1993) A test for multivariate normality in stock returns. J Bus 66: 295–321
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
B. Kawas’s work supported in part by NSF Grant CMMI-0757983.
A. Thiele’s work supported in part by NSF Grant CMMI-0757983 and an IBM Faculty Award.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kawas, B., Thiele, A. A log-robust optimization approach to portfolio management. OR Spectrum 33, 207–233 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-008-0162-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-008-0162-3