Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Two simplified proofs for Roberts’ theorem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roberts (Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences. Papers presented at the 1st European Summer Workshop of the Econometric Society, pp. 321–349. North-Holland, 1979) showed that every social choice function that is ex-post implementable in private value settings must be weighted VCG, i.e. it maximizes the weighted social welfare. This paper provides two simplified proofs for this. The first proof uses the same underlying key-point, but significantly simplifies the technical construction around it, thus helps to shed light on it. The second proof builds on monotonicity conditions identified by Rochet (J Math Econ 16:191–200, 1987) and Bikhchandani et al. (Econometrica 74(4):1109–1132, 2006). This proof is for a weaker statement that assumes an additional condition of “player decisiveness”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartal Y, Gonen R, Nisan N (2003) Incentive compatible multi-unit combinatorial auctions, 2003. Working paper, The Hebrew University. Presented in TARK-03

  • Bikhchandani S, Chatterji S, Lavi R, Mu’alem A, Nisan N, Sen A (2006) Weak monotonicity characterizes deterministic dominant strategy implementation. Econometrica 74(4): 1109–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui H, Muller R, Vohra R (2004) Characterizing dominant strategy mechanisms with multi-dimensional types, 2004. Working paper, Northwestern University

  • Holzman R, Monderer D (2004) Characterization of ex-post equilibrium in the VCG combinatorial auctions. Games Econ Behav 47: 87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehiel P, ter Vehn MM, Moldovanu B (2004) Ex-post implementation and preference aggregation via potenials, 2004. Working paper (in revision for J Econ Theory)

  • Kalai E, Muller E, Satterthwaite M (1979) Social welfare functions when preferences are convex, strictly monotonic, and continuous. Public Choice 34: 87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavi R, Mu’alem A, Nisan N (2003) Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions, 2003. Working paper, The Hebrew University. Preliminary version presented in FOCS-03

  • Meyer-ter-Vehn M, Moldovanu B (2002) Ex-post implementation with interdependent valuations, 2002. Discussion paper, University of Bonn

  • Myerson R (1981) Optimal auction design. Math Oper Res 6: 58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts K (1979) The characterization of implementable choice rules. In: Laffont J (ed) Aggregation and revelation of preferences. Papers presented at the 1st European Summer Workshop of the Econometric Society, pp 321–349, North-Holland

  • Rochet JC (1987) A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context. J Math Econ 16: 191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenshtrom I (1999) Dominant strategy implementation with quasi-linear preferences, 1999. Master’s thesis, Dept. of Economics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Saks M, Yu L (2005) Weak monotonicity suffices for truthfulness on convex domains. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (ACM-EC)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Lavi.

Additional information

Supported by grants from the Israeli Ministry of Science and the Israeli Academy of Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavi, R., Mu’alem, A. & Nisan, N. Two simplified proofs for Roberts’ theorem. Soc Choice Welf 32, 407–423 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0331-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0331-y

Keywords