Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new hybrid ANFIS–PSO model for prediction of peak particle velocity due to bench blasting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a novel hybrid approach is proposed for predicting peak particle velocity (PPV) due to bench blasting in open pit mines. The proposed approach is based on the combination of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). In this approach, the PSO is used to improve the performance of ANFIS. Furthermore, a model is developed based on support vector regression (SVR) approach. The models are trained and tested based on actual data compiled from 120 blast rounds in Sarcheshmeh copper mine. To determine the accuracy and efficiency of ANFIS–PSO and SVR models, a statistical model (USBM equation) is applied. According to the obtained results, both techniques can be used to predict the PPV, but the comparison of models shows that the ANFIS–PSO model provides better results. Root mean square error (RMSE), variance account for (VAF), and coefficient of determination (R 2) indices were obtained as 1.83, 93.37 and 0.957 for ANFIS–PSO model, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jimeno CL, Jimeno EL, Carcedo FJA (1995) Drilling and blasting of rocks. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhandari S (1997) Engineering rock blasting operations. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pal Roy P (2005) Rock blasting effects and operations. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2007) Evaluation of blast-induced ground vibration predictors. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 27:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duvall WI, Petkof BB (1959) Spherical propagation of explosion generated strain pulses in rock. US Bur Mines, RI 5483

  6. Dowding CH (1985) Blast vibration monitoring and control. Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siskind DE, Stagg MS, Kopp JW, Dowding CH (1980) Structure response and damage produced by ground vibration from surface mine blasting. US Bur Mines, RI 8507

  8. Duvall WI, Fogelson DE (1962) Review of criteria for estimating damage to residences from blasting vibration. US Bur Mines, RI 5968

  9. Edwards AT, Northwood TD (1960) Experimental study of effects of blasting on structures. Engineering 210:539–546

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholls HR, Johnson CF, Duvall WI (1971) Blasting vibrations and their effects on structures. US Bur Mines, RI 656

  11. German Institute of Standards (1986) Vibration of building-effects on structures. DIN 4150, Vol 3, pp 1–5

  12. Siskind DE (2000) Vibrations from blasting. ISEE Publication, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duvall WI, Petkof BB (1959) Spherical propagation of explosion generated strain pulses in rock. US Bur Mines, RI 5483

  14. Langefors U, Kihlstrom B (1963) The modern technique of rock blasting. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davies B, Farmer IW, Attewell PB (1964) Ground vibrations from shallow sub-surface blasts. Engineering 217:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ambraseys NN, Hendron AJ (1968) Dynamic behavior of rock masses. In: Stagg KG, Zienkiewicz OC (eds) Rock mechanics in engineering practices. Wiley, London, pp 203–227

    Google Scholar 

  17. Indian Standard Institute (1973) Criteria for safety and design of structures subjected to underground blast. ISI Bull No 6922

  18. Ghosh A, Daemen JK (1983) A simple new blast vibration predictor (based on wave propagation laws). In: Proceedings of the 24th US symposium on rock mechanics, Texas, USA, pp 151–161

  19. Gupta RN, Pal Roy P, Singh B (1987) On a blast induced blast vibration predictor for efficient blasting. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on safety in mines research institute, Beijing, China, pp 1015–1021

  20. Pal Roy P (1991) Vibration control in an opencast mine based on improved blast vibration predictors. Min Sci Tech 12(2):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rai R, Singh TN (2004) A new predictor for ground vibration prediction and its comparison with other predictors. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 11(3):178–184

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ghasemi E, Araei M, Hashemolhosseini H (2012) Development of a fuzzy model for predicting ground vibration caused by rock blasting in surface mining. J Vib Contr 19(5):755–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh TN (2004) Artificial neural network approach for prediction and control of ground vibrations in mines. Mining Technol 113(4):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh TN, Singh V (2005) An intelligent approach to predict and control ground vibration in mines. Geotech Geol Eng 23(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2006) Prediction of blast induced vibrations and frequency in opencast mine: a neural network approach. J Sound Vib 289:711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(7):1214–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khandelwal M, Kumar DL, Yellishetty M (2011) Application of soft computing to predict blasting-induced ground vibration. Eng Comput 27(2):117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohamed MT (2011) Performance of fuzzy logic and artificial neural network in prediction of ground and air vibrations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(5):845–851

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Mozdianfard MR, Siamaki A (2010) Predicting of blasting vibrations in Sarcheshmeh copper mine by neural network. Saf Sci 48(3):319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Monjezi M, Ahmadi M, Sheikhan M, Bahrami A, Salimi AR (2010) Predicting blast-induced ground vibration using various types of neural networks. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 30(11):1233–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dehghani H, Ataee-pour M (2011) Development of a model to predict peak particle velocity in a blasting operation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(1):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kamali M, Ataei M (2011) Prediction of blast induced vibrations in the structures of Karoun III power plant and dam. J Vib Contr 17(4):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Monjezi M, Ghafurikalajahi M, Bahrami A (2011) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Monjezi M, Hasanipanah M, Khandelwal M (2013) Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 22:1637–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saadat M, Khandelwal M, Monjezi M (2014) An ANN-based approach to predict blast-induced ground vibration of Gol-E-Gohar iron ore mine, Iran. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vasovic D, Kostic S, Ravilic M, Trajkovic S (2014) Environmental impact of blasting at Drenovac limestone quarry (Serbia). Environ Earth Sci 72:3915–3928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alvarez-Vigil AE, Gonzalez-Nicieza C, Gayarre Lopez F, Alvarez-Fernandez MI (2012) Predicting blasting propagation velocity and vibration frequency using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 55:108–116

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gorgulu K, Arpaz E, Demirci A, Kocaslan A, Dilmac MK, Yuksek AG (2013) Investigation of blast-induced ground vibrations in the Tulu boron open pit mine. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gorgulu K, Arpaz E, Uysal O, Duruturk YS, Yuksek AG, Kocaslan A, Dilmac MK (2015) Investigation of the effects of blasting design parameters and rock properties on blast-induced ground vibrations. Arab J Geosci 8:4269–4278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ghoraba S, Monjezi M, Talebi N, Moghadam MR, Jahed Armaghani D (2015) Prediction of ground vibration caused by blasting operations through a neural network approach: a case study of Gol-E-Gohar Iron Mine, Iran. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A. doi:10.1631/jzus.A1400252

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fisne A, Kuzu C, Hudaverdi T (2011) Prediction of environmental impacts of quarry blasting operation using fuzzy logic. Environ Monit Assess 174(1–4):461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Iphar M, Yavuz M, Ak H (2008) prediction of ground vibrations resulting from the blasting operations in an open-pit mine by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Environ Geol 56(1):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rao YS, Rao KM (2009) Prediction of ground vibrations and frequency in opencast mine using neuro-fuzzy technique. J Sci Ind Res 68:292–295

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mohammadi SS, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Bahadori M (2011) Prediction ground vibration caused by blasting operations in Sarcheshmeh copper mine considering the charge type by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Arch Min Sci 56(4):701–710

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ataei M, Kamali M (2013) Prediction of blast-induced vibration by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in Karoun 3 power plant and dam. J Vib Contr 19(12):1906–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jahed Armaghani D, Momeni E, Khalil Abad SVAN, Khandelwal M (2015) Feasibility of ANFIS model for prediction of ground vibrations resulting from quarry blasting. Environ Earth Sci 74:2845–2860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Monjezi M, Mohamad ET, Marto A, Moghaddam MR (2015) Application of two intelligent systems in predicting environmental impacts of quarry blasting. Arab J Geosci 8:9647–9665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mohammadnejad M, Gholami R, Ramazanzadeh A, Jalali ME (2012) Prediction of blast-induced vibrations in limestone quarries using Support Vector Machine. J Vib Contr 18(9):1322–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Khandelwal M (2010) Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using support vector machine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Khandelwal M (2011) Blast-induced ground vibration prediction using support vector machine. Eng Comput 27:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Verma AK, Singh TN (2013) Comparative study of cognitive systems for ground vibration measurements. Neural Comput Appl 22:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Verma AK, Singh TN, Maheshwar S (2014) Comparative study of intelligent prediction models for pressure wave velocity. J Geosci Geomatic 2(3):130–138

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dindarloo SR (2015) Peak particle velocity prediction using support vector machines: a surface blasting case study. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 115:637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hasanipanah M, Monjezi M, Shahnazari A, Jahed Armaghani D, Farazmand A (2015) Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine. Measurement 75:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Verma AK, Singh TN (2011) Intelligent systems for ground vibration measurement: a comparative study. Eng Comput 27(3):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Marto A, Mohamad ET (2015) Ground vibration prediction in quarry blasting through an artificial neural network optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:873–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Mohamad ET, Marto A, Noorani SA (2014) Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arab J Geosci 7:5383–5396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Monjezi M, Mohamad ET, Marto A (2015) Blast-induced air and ground vibration prediction: a particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural network approach. Environ Earth Sci 74:2799–2817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dutta S (2010) Obstacle avoidance of mobile robot using PSO based neuro fuzzy technique. Int J Comput Sci Eng 2:30–304

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pousinho HMI, Mendes VMF, Catalao JPS (2011) A hybrid PSO-ANFIS approach for short-term wind power prediction in Portugal. Energ Convers Manag 52:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Jiang HM, Kwong CK, Ip WH, Wong TC (2012) Modeling customer satisfaction for new product development using PSO-based ANFIS approach. Appl Soft Comput 12:726–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen MY (2013) A hybrid ANFIS model for business failure prediction utilizing particle swarm optimization and subtractive clustering. Inform Sci 220:180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Djavareshkian MH, Esmaeili A (2014) Heuristic optimization of submerged hydrofoil using ANFIS-PSO. Ocean Eng 92:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Basser H, Karami H, Shamshirband S, Akib S, Amirmojahedi M, Ahmad R, Jahangirzadeh A, Javidnia H (2015) Hybrid ANFIS–PSO approach for predicting optimum parameters of a protective spur dike. Appl Soft Comput 30:642–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Jang JSR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization, In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth, Australia, pp 1942–1948

  67. Jang JSR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sumathi S, Paneerselvam S (2010) Computational intelligence paradigms: theory and applications using Matlab. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  69. Engelbrecht AP (2007) Computational intelligence: an introduction. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  70. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Venkoba Rao B, Gopalakrishna SJ (2009) Hardgrove grindability index prediction using support vector regression. Int J Miner Process 91:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Azamathulla HM, Ghani AA, Chang CK, Hasan ZA, Zakaria NA (2010) Machine learning approach to predict sediment load—a case study. CLEAN Soil Air Water 38:969–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Suganyadevi MV, Babulal CK (2014) Support vector regression model for the prediction of loadability of a power system. Appl Soft Comput 24:304–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yao B, Hu P, Zhang M, Jin M (2014) A support vector machine with the tabu search algorithm for freeway incident detection. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 24:397–404

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Tan P, Zhang C, Xia J, Fang QY, Chen G (2015) Estimation of higher heating value of coal based on proximate analysis using support vector regression. Fuel Process Tech 138:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Vapnik VN (1999) An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Trans Neural Network 10(5):988–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2(3):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their critical reviews and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, P.O. Box 8415683111, Iran

    Ebrahim Ghasemi, Hamid Kalhori & Raheb Bagherpour

Authors
  1. Ebrahim Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamid Kalhori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raheb Bagherpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebrahim Ghasemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, E., Kalhori, H. & Bagherpour, R. A new hybrid ANFIS–PSO model for prediction of peak particle velocity due to bench blasting. Engineering with Computers 32, 607–614 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0438-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0438-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation