Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A sequential constraints updating approach for Kriging surrogate model-assisted engineering optimization design problem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kriging surrogate model has been widely used in engineering design optimization problems to replace computational cost simulations. To facilitate the usage of the Kriging surrogate model-assisted engineering optimization design, there are still challenging issues on the updating of Kriging surrogate model for the constraints, since there exists prediction error between the Kriging surrogate model and the real constraints. Ignoring the interpolation uncertainties from the Kriging surrogate model of constraints may lead to infeasible optimal solutions. In this paper, general sequential constraints updating approach based on the confidence intervals from the Kriging surrogate model (SCU-CI) are proposed. In the proposed SCU-CI approach, an objective switching and sequential updating strategy is introduced based on whether the feasibility status of the design alternatives would be changed because of the interpolation uncertainty from the Kriging surrogate model or not. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SCU-CI approach, nine numerical examples and two practical engineering cases are used. The comparisons between the proposed approach and five existing approaches considering the quality of the obtained optimum and computational efficiency are made. Results illustrate that the proposed SCU-CI approach can generally ensure the feasibility of the optimal solution under a reasonable computational cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2017) A surrogate modeling approach for reliability analysis of a multidisciplinary system with spatio–temporal output. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(3):553–569

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang C, Qiu H, Yang Z, Chen L, Gao L, Li P (2019) A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 183:47–59

    Google Scholar 

  3. Han Z-H, Zhang Y, Song C-X, Zhang K-S (2017) Weighted gradient-enhanced Kriging for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and design optimization. AIAA J 55(12):4330–4346

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu J, Zhou Q, Jiang P, Shao X, Xie T (2018) An adaptive sampling method for variable-fidelity surrogate models using improved hierarchical Kriging. Eng Optim 50(1):145–163

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang H, Chen L, Li E (2017) Time dependent sheet metal forming optimization by using Gaussian process assisted firefly algorithm. Int J Mater Form pp. 1–17

  6. Song X, Sun G, Li G, Gao W, Li Q (2012) Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tapered thin-walled structure using multiple surrogate models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):221–231

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou Q, Jiang P, Shao X, Hu J, Cao L, Wan L (2017) A variable fidelity information fusion method based on radial basis function. Adv Eng Inform 32:26–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bellary SAI, Samad A, Couckuyt I, Dhaene T (2015) A comparative study of kriging variants for the optimization of a turbomachinery system. Eng Comput 32(1):49–59

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang P, Zhang Y, Zhou Q, Shao X, Hu J, Shu L (2018) An adaptive sampling strategy for Kriging metamodel based on Delaunay triangulation and TOPSIS. Appl Intell 48(6):1644–1656

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouhlel MA, Martins JRRA (2018) Gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional problems. Eng Comput 35(1):157–173

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dong H, Song B, Dong Z, Wang P (2018) SCGOSR: surrogate-based constrained global optimization using space reduction. Appl Soft Comput 65:462–477

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. J Mech Des 127(6):1077

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou Q, Shao XY, Jiang P, Gao ZM, Zhou H, Shu LS (2016) An active learning variable-fidelity metamodelling approach based on ensemble of metamodels and objective-oriented sequential sampling. J Eng Des 27(4–6):205–231

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang C, Cai X, Qiu H, Gao L, Li P (2018) A two-stage support vector regression assisted sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(4):1657–1672

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chatterjee T, Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) A critical review of surrogate assisted robust design optimization. Arch Comput Methods Eng 26:245–725

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou Q, Shao XY, Jiang P, Zhou H, Cao LC, Zhang L (2015) A deterministic robust optimisation method under interval uncertainty based on the reverse model. J Eng Des 26(10–12):416–444

    Google Scholar 

  17. Assari P, Dehghan M (2017) The numerical solution of two-dimensional logarithmic integral equations on normal domains using radial basis functions with polynomial precision. Eng Comput 33(4):853–870

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou Q, Wang Y, Choi S-K, Jiang P, Shao X, Hu J, Shu L (2018) A robust optimization approach based on multi-fidelity metamodel. Struct Multidisciplin Optimization 57(2):775–797

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaintura A, Spina D, Couckuyt I, Knockaert L, Bogaerts W, Dhaene T (2017) A Kriging and stochastic collocation ensemble for uncertainty quantification in engineering applications. Eng Comput 33:935–949

    Google Scholar 

  20. Han Z, Zimmerman R, Görtz S (2012) Alternative cokriging method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling. AIAA J 50(5):1205–1210

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang C, Radi B, El Hami A, Bai H (2018) CMA evolution strategy assisted by kriging model and approximate ranking. Appl Intell 48:4288–4304

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shao W, Deng H, Ma Y, Wei Z (2011) Extended Gaussian Kriging for computer experiments in engineering design. Eng Comput 28(2):161–178

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toal DJJ (2015) A study into the potential of GPUs for the efficient construction and evaluation of Kriging models. Eng Comput 32(3):377–404

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng J, Jiang P, Zhou Q, Jiexiang H, Tao Y, Leshi S, Xinyu S (2019) A lower confidence bounding approach based on the coefficient of variation for expensive global design optimization. Eng Comput 1:2. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-08-2018-0390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng J, Li Z, Gao L, Jiang G, Owen D (2016) A parameterized lower confidence bounding scheme for adaptive metamodel-based design optimization. Eng Comput 33(7):2165–2184

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen S, Jiang Z, Yang S, Chen W (2016) Multimodel fusion based sequential optimization. AIAA J 55(1):241–254

    Google Scholar 

  27. Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2007) A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions. Informs J Comput 19(4):497–509

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Hennig P, Schuler CJ (2012) Entropy search for information-efficient global optimization. J Mach Learn Res 13:1809–1837

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Krause A, Ong CS (2011) Contextual gaussian process bandit optimization. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst

  30. Viana FA, Haftka RT, Watson LT (2013) Efficient global optimization algorithm assisted by multiple surrogate techniques. J Glob Optim 56(2):669–689

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim 13(4):455–492

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Sóbester A, Leary SJ, Keane AJ (2005) On the design of optimization strategies based on global response surface approximation models. J Glob Optim 33(1):31–59

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang H, Li E, Li GY (2009) The least square support vector regression coupled with parallel sampling scheme metamodeling technique and application in sheet forming optimization. Mater Des 30(5):1468–1479

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhan D, Qian J, Cheng Y (2017) Balancing global and local search in parallel efficient global optimization algorithms. J Glob Optim 67(4):873–892

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Dong H, Song B, Wang P, Dong Z (2018) Hybrid surrogate-based optimization using space reduction (HSOSR) for expensive black-box functions. Appl Soft Comput 64:641–655

    Google Scholar 

  36. Haftka RT, Villanueva D, Chaudhuri A (2016) Parallel surrogate-assisted global optimization with expensive functions—a survey. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(1):3–13

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Schonlau M (1997) Computer experiments and global optimization

  38. Li Y, Wu Y, Zhao J, Chen L (2017) A Kriging-based constrained global optimization algorithm for expensive black-box functions with infeasible initial points. J Glob Optim 67(1–2):343–366

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Z, Ierapetritou M (2018) Constrained optimization of black-box stochastic systems using a novel feasibility enhanced Kriging-based method. Comput Chem Eng 118:210–230

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Y, Han ZH, Zhang KS (2018) Variable-fidelity expected improvement method for efficient global optimization of expensive functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58:1431–1451

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Parr JM, Keane AJ, Forrester AIJ, Holden CME (2012) Infill sampling criteria for surrogate-based optimization with constraint handling. Eng Optim 44(10):1147–1166

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Sasena MJ, Papalambros P, Goovaerts P (2002) Exploration of metamodeling sampling criteria for constrained global optimization. Eng optim 34(3):263–278

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bichon BJ, Eldred MS, Swiler LP, Mahadevan S, McFarland JM (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li X, Qiu H, Chen Z, Gao L, Shao X (2016) A local Kriging approximation method using MPP for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 162:102–115

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shu L, Jiang P, Wan L, Zhou Q, Shao X, Zhang Y (2017) Metamodel-based design optimization employing a novel sequential sampling strategy. Eng Comput 34(8):2547–2564

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liu H, Xu S, Chen X, Wang X, Ma Q (2016) Constrained global optimization via a DIRECT-type constraint-handling technique and an adaptive metamodeling strategy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:155–177

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Dong H, Song B, Dong Z, Wang P (2016) Multi-start space reduction (MSSR) surrogate-based global optimization method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(4):907–926

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shi R, Liu L, Long T, Wu Y, Tang Y (2019) Filter-based adaptive Kriging method for black-box optimization problems with expensive objective and constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 347:782–805

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu Y, Yin Q, Jie H, Wang B, Zhao J (2018) A RBF-based constrained global optimization algorithm for problems with computationally expensive objective and constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim pp. 1–23

  50. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4:409–423

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou Q, Wang Y, Choi S-K, Jiang P, Shao X, Hu J (2017) A sequential multi-fidelity metamodeling approach for data regression. Knowl-Based Syst 134:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  52. Coello CAC (2000) Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems. Comput Ind 41(2):113–127

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhu J, Wang Y-J, Collette M (2013) A multi-objective variable-fidelity optimization method for genetic algorithms. Eng Optim 46(4):521–542

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou H, Zhou Q, Liu C, Zhou T (2018) A kriging metamodel-assisted robust optimization method based on a reverse model. Eng Optim 50(2):253–272

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang Z, Ierapetritou M (2018) Constrained optimization of black-box stochastic systems using a novel feasibility enhanced Kriging-based method. Comput Chem Eng 118:210–223

    Google Scholar 

  56. Garcia S, Herrera F (2008) An extension on “statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets” for all pairwise comparisons. J Mach Learn Res 9:2677–2694

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 51805179, 51775203, and the Research Funds of the Maritime Defense Technologies Innovation, and the Research Funds of the defense technologies leadership.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, People’s Republic of China

    Jiachang Qian, Jiaxiang Yi, Yuansheng Cheng & Jun Liu

  2. Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Institute, Wuhan, 430064, Hubei, People’s Republic of China

    Jiachang Qian

  3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration (CISSE), Shanghai, 200240, People’s Republic of China

    Yuansheng Cheng & Jun Liu

  4. School of Aerospace Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, People’s Republic of China

    Qi Zhou

Authors
  1. Jiachang Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiaxiang Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuansheng Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qi Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Zhou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, J., Yi, J., Cheng, Y. et al. A sequential constraints updating approach for Kriging surrogate model-assisted engineering optimization design problem. Engineering with Computers 36, 993–1009 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00745-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00745-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation