Abstract
In this paper two different finite element formulations for frictionless large deformation contact problems with non-matching meshes are presented. Both are based on the mortar method. The first formulation introduces the contact constraints via Lagrange multipliers, the other employs the penalty method. Both formulations differ in size and the way of fulfilling the contact constraints, thus different strategies to determine the permanently changing contact area are required. Starting from the contact potential energy, the variational formulation, the linearization and finally the matrix formulation of both methods are derived. In combination with different contact detection methods the global solution algorithm is applied to different two-dimensional examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker R, Hansbo P (1999) A Finite Element Method for Domain Decomposition with Non-matching Grids. Technical Report No. 3613, INRIA Sophia Antipolis
Belgacem FB, Hild P, Laborde P (1999) The Mortar Finite Element Method for Contact Problems. Numer Math 84:173–197
Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera A (2001) A new conforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method. In Brezis H, Lions JL (eds) Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications, John Wiley Sons, New York, pp 13–51
Hallquist J (1979) Nike2d: An Implicit, Finite Deformation, Finite Element Code for the Analysing the Static and Dynamic Response of Two-dimensional Solids. Report UCRL 52678, UC-Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hild P (2000) Numerical implementation of two nonconforming finite element methods for unilateral contact. Comput Meth in Appl Mech Eng 184:99–123
Krause R (2001) Monotone Multigrid Methods for Signorini’s problem with Friction. Ph.D. thesis, Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik der Freien Universität Berlin
Laursen TA (2002) Computational Contact and ImpactMechanics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
McDevitt TW, Laursen TA (2000) A mortar-finite element formulation for frictional contact problems. Int J Numer Meth Engng 48:1525–1547
Nitsche J (1970) Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet-Problemen bei Verwendung von Teilräumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind. Abhandlungen in der Mathematik an der Universität Hamburg, 36:9–15
Oden JT (1981) Exterior penalty methods for contact problems in elasticity. In Wunderlich KJBW, Stein E (ed) Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis in Structural Mechanics. Springer, Berlin
Pietrzak G (1997) Continuum Mechnaics Modelling and Augmented Lagrangian Formulation of Large Deformation Frictional Contact Problems. Technical Report 1656, Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne, EPFL
Puso MA (2004) A 3D mortar method for solid mechanics. IJNME, 59(3):315–336
Puso MA, Laursen TA (2004) A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng 193:601–629
Simo JC, Taylor RL, Wriggers P (1985) A perturbed lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng 50:163–180
Stadter JT, Weiss RO (1979) Analysis of contact through finite element gaps. Comp Struct 10:867–873
Wohlmuth B, Krause R (2002) Monotone methods on non-matching grids for nonlinear contact problems. Technical Report No. 06, Universität Stuttgart
Wohlmuth BI (2000) A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the Lagrange Multiplier. SIAM J Numer Anal 38(3):989–1012
Wohlmuth BI (2001) Discretization Methods and Iterative Solvers Based on Domain Decomposition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
Wriggers P (2002a) Computational Contact Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England
Wriggers P (2002b) Computational Contact Mechanics, John Wiley 287
Wriggers P, Simo JC (1985) A note on tangent stiffness for fully nonlinear contact problems. Comp Appl Num Meth 1:199–203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, K.A., Wriggers, P. Frictionless 2D Contact formulations for finite deformations based on the mortar method. Comput Mech 36, 226–244 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0660-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0660-y