Abstract
Artificial neural networks (NN) have been widely used for both prediction and classification tasks in many fields of knowledge; however, few studies are available on dairy science. In this work, we use NN models to predict next week’s goat milk based on the current and previous milk production. A total of 35 Murciano-Granadina dairy goats were selected from a commercial farm according to number of lactation, litter size and body weight. Input variables taken into account were diet, milk production, stage of lactation and days between partum and first control. From the 35 goats, 22 goats were used to build the neural model and 13 goats were used to validate the model. It is important to emphasize that these 13 goats were not used to build the model in order to demonstrate the generalization capability of the network. Afterwards, the neural models that provided better prediction results were analysed in order to determine the relative importance of the input variables of the model. We found that the most important inputs are present and previous milk production, followed by days between parturition, and first milk control, and type of diet. Besides, we benchmark NN to other widely used prediction models, such as auto-regressive system modelling or naïve prediction. The results obtained with the neural models are better than with the rest of models. The best neural model in terms of accuracy provided a root mean square error equal to 0.57 kg/day and a low bias mean error equal to − 0.05 kg/day. Dairy goat farmers could make management decisions during current lactation from one week to the next (present time), based on present and/or previous milk production and dairy goat factors, without waiting until the end of lactation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Falagán A, Guerrero JE, Serrano A (1995) Systèmes d’elevage caprin dans le sud de l’Espagne in Proc. Goat production systems in the Mediterranean. EAAP publication no. 71, Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 38–50
Analla M, Jiménez-Gamero I, Muñoz-Serrano A, Serradilla JM, Falagán A (1996) Estimation of genetic parameters for milk yield and fat and protein contents of milk from Murciano-Granadina goats. J Dairy Sci 79:1895–1998
Hanigan M, Bequette B, Cromton L, France J (2000) Modeling mammary aminoacid metabolism. Livest Prod Sci 70(1–2):63–78
Wilmink JBM (1987) Studies on test-day and lactation milk, fat and protein yield of dairy cows. PhD Royal Dutch Cattle Syndicate, Arnhem, p 123
Van Tassel CP, Jones LR, Eicker SW (1995) Production evaluation techniques base don lactation curves. J Dairy Sci 78:457–465
Scott TA, Yandell B, Zepeda L, Shaver RD, Smith TR (1996) Use of lactation curves for analysis of milk production data. J Dairy Sci 79:1885–1894
Cappio-Borlino A, Portolano B, Todaro M, Macciota NP, Giaccone P, Pulina G (1997) Lactation curves of Valle del Belice dairy ewes for yield of milk, fat and protein estimated with test day models. J Dairy Sci 80:3023–3029
Fernández C, Sánchez A, Garcés C (2002) Modeling the lactation curve for test-day milk yield in Murciano-Granadina goats. Small Rumin Res 46:29–41
Pedauye J (1989) Lactation curve and milk composition in Murciano-Granadina goats breed. Anales de Veterinaria 5:3–11
Gipson TA, Grossman M (1990) Lactation curves in dairy goats: a review. Small Rum Res 3:383–396
Falagán A, González C, Pérez SJ, Goicoechea A, Romero C (1991) Composition and production curve in the goat’s milk. Chem Mikrobiol Technol Lebensm 13:76–82
Grossman M, Koops WJ (1988) Multiphasic analysis of lactation curves in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 71:1598–1608
Beever DE, Rook AJ, France J, Dhanoa MS, Gill M (1991) A review of empirical and mechanistic model of lactational performance by the dairy cow. Livest Prod Sci 29:115–130
Lippmann RP (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Mag 4:4–22
Carvalheira JGV, Blake RW, Pollak E.J, Quaas RL, Duran-Castro CV (1998) Application of an autoregressive process to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values for daily milk yield in a tropical herd of Lucerna cattle and in United States Holstein herds. J Dairy Sci 81:2738–2751
Pool MH, Meuwissen THE (1999) Prediction of daily milk yield from a limited number of test days using test day models. J Dairy Sci 82:1555–1564
Macciotta NPP, Cappio-Borlino A, Pulina G (2000) Time series autoregressive integrated moving average modelling of test-day milk of dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci 83:1094–1103
Ripley BD (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, London
Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Heald CW, Kim T, Sischo WM, Cooper JB, Wolfgang DR (2000) A computerized mastitis decision aid using farm-based records: an artificial neural network approach. J Dairy Sci 83:711–720
Paquet J, Lacroix C, Thibault J (2000) Modeling of pH and acidity for industrial cheese production. J Dairy Sci 83:2393–2409
Grzesiak W, Lacroix R, Wojcik J, Blaszcyk P (2003) A comparison of neural network and multiple regression predictions for 305-day lactation yield using partial lactation records. Can J Anim Sci 83:307–310
Fernández C, Soria E, Martin JD, Serrano AJ (2006) Neural network for animal science applications; two case studies. Expert Syst Appl 31:444–450
INRA, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (1988) Page 471 in Alimentation des bovins, ovins and caprins (feeding of cattle, sheep and goats). Paris
AFRC, Agricultural and Food Research Council (1993) Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallington, UK, p 151
NRC, National Research Council (1998) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Publication no. 85, NIH, Washington, DC, p 23
Luenberger D (1984) Linear and nonlinear programming, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA
Wood PDP (1969) Factors affecting the shape of the lactation curve in cattle. Anim Prod 11:307–312
Auran T (1973) Studies on monthly and cumulative monthly milk yield record. 1 The effect of age, month of calving, herd and length of the first period. Acta Agric Scand 23:189–199
Matlab (1997) The language of technical computing. The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA
Ljung L (1999) System identification. Theory for the user, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Bishop CM (1996) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Orr GB, Müller KR (1998) Neural networks: tricks of the trade. Springer, Berlin Heidenberg New York
Refenes AN, Zapranis A, Francis G (1994) Stock performance modeling using neural networks: comparative study with regression models. Neural Netw 7(2):375–388
Sarle WS (2000) How to measure importance of inputs? Available from http://www.ftp.sas.com/pub/neural/importance.html, accessed January 2003
Fernández C, Lachica M, Garcés C, Aguilera J (2004) Necesidades nutritivas del ganado caprino lechero. In: Caprino G (ed) Agrícola Española. p 312
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernández, C., Soria, E., Sánchez-Seiquer, P. et al. Weekly milk prediction on dairy goats using neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 16, 373–381 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-006-0061-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-006-0061-y