Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Combining affinity propagation with supervised dictionary learning for image classification

  • ICONIP 2011
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently support vector machines (SVM) using spatial pyramid matching (SPM) kernel have been highly successful in image classification applications. And linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding (ScSPM) scheme has been proposed to enhance the performance of SPM both in time and classification accuracy. In order to reduce the time complexity of dictionary construction process, sparse coding with affinity propagation method has been proposed in this paper. Because the dictionary used for sparse coding plays a key role in these methods, we also adopt supervised dictionary learning method to construct dictionary. The coding coefficients of each class have greater separability for SVM classification. Substantial experiments on Scene15 and CalTech101 image datasets have been conducted to investigate the performance of proposed approach in multi-class image classification; the results show that the approach can reach higher accuracy compared with ScSPM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Xu BX, Guo P (2011) A generalized subspace projection approach for sparse representation classification. In: Proceedings of international conference on neural information processing. Shanghai, pp 203–210

  2. Liang MY, Du JP, Jia YM, Sun ZQ (2010) Image semantic description and automatic semantic annotation. In: Proceedings of international conference on control, automation and systems. Gyeonggi-do, pp 1192–1195

  3. Perronnin F (2008) Universal and adapted vocabularies for generic visual categorization. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(7):1243–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Monay F, Gatica-Perez D (2007) Modeling semantic aspects for cross-media image indexing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(10):1802–1817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrov N, Georgieva A, Jordanov L (2012) Self-organizing maps for texture classification. Neural Comp Appl 1–10, doi:10.1007/s00521-011-0797-x

  6. Csurka G, Dance CR, Fan LX, Willamowski J, Bray C (2004) Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In: Proceedings of European conference on computer vision workshop on statistical learning in computer vision. Prague, pp 1–22

  7. Yang Y, Jiang YG, Hauptmann AG, Ngo CW (2007) Evaluating bag-of-visual-words representations in scene classification. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on multimedia information retrieval. Augsburg, pp 197–206

  8. Jurie F, Triggs B (2005) Creating efficient codebooks for visual recognition. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer vision. Beijing, pp 604–610

  9. Jegou H, Douze M, Schmid C (2010) Improving bag-of-features for large scale image search. Int J Comput Vison 87(3):316–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang JC, Yu K, Gong YH, Huang T (2009) Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Miami, pp 1794–1801

  11. Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J (2006) Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. New York, pp 2169–2178

  12. Hu RK, Guo P (2011) Speed up spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding with affinity propagation algorithm. In: Proceedings of international conference on neural information processing. Shanghai, pp 467–474

  13. Yang M, Zhang L, Feng XC, Zhang D (2011) Fisher discrimination dictionary learning for sparse representation. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer vision. Barcelona, pp 1–8

  14. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grauman K, Darrell T (2007) The pyramid match kernels:discriminative classification with sets of image features. J Mach Learn Res 8:725–760

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Willamowski J, Arregui D, Csurka G, Dance CR, Fan L (2004) Categorizing nine visual classes using local appearance descriptors. In: Proceedings of international conference on pattern recognition Workshop on learning for adaptable visual systems, Washington

  17. Frey BJ, Dueck D (2007) Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315(5814):972–976

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang W, Ding F, Xiang QL (2008) An affinity propagation based method for vector quantization codebook design. In: Proceedings of international conference on pattern recognition. Tampa, pp 1–4

  19. Duda R, Hart P, Stork D (2000) Pattern classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  20. Lee H, Battle A, Raina R, Ng AY (2004) Efficient sparse coding algorithms. In: Proceedings of international conference on neural information processing systems, Vancouver, pp 801–808

  21. Li FF, Fergus R, Perona P (2007) Learning generative visual models from few training examples: an incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. Comput Vis Image Und 106(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research work described in this paper was fully supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 90820010, 60911130513). Prof. Ping Guo is the author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Guo.

Additional information

This work is an extended version of the paper presented at the 2011 International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP) [1].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, B., Hu, R. & Guo, P. Combining affinity propagation with supervised dictionary learning for image classification. Neural Comput & Applic 22, 1301–1308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0957-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0957-7

Keywords