Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Local coupled extreme learning machine

  • Extreme Learning Machine and Applications
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 28 July 2016

Abstract

Due to the significant efficiency and simple implementation, extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithms enjoy much attention in regression and classification applications recently. Many efforts have been paid to enhance the performance of ELM from both methodology (ELM training strategies) and structure (incremental or pruned ELMs) perspectives. In this paper, a local coupled extreme learning machine (LC-ELM) algorithm is presented. By assigning an address to each hidden node in the input space, LC-ELM introduces a decoupler framework to ELM in order to reduce the complexity of the weight searching space. The activated degree of a hidden node is measured by the membership degree of the similarity between the associated address and the given input. Experimental results confirm that the proposed approach works effectively and generally outperforms the original ELM in both regression and classification applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang G-B, Wang D, Lan Y (2011) Extreme learning machines: a survey. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Y, Wang Y, Yuan X (2012) Bidirectional extreme learning machine for regression problem and its learning effectiveness. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23:1498–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qu Y, Shang C, Wu W, Shen Q (2011) Evolutionary fuzzy extreme learning machine for mammographic risk analysis. Int J Fuzzy Syst 13:282–291

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang N-Y, Huang G-B, Saratchandran P, Sundararajan N (2006) A fast and accurate online sequential learning algorithm for feedforward networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17:1411–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Q-Y, Qin AK, Suganthan PN, Huang G-B (2005) Evolutionary extreme learning machine. Pattern Recognit 38:1759–1763

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang X, Han M (2009) Partial lanczos extreme learning machine for single-output regression problems. Neurocomputing 72:3066–3076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang G-B, Chen L, Siew C-K (2006) Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17:879–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rong H-J, Ong Y-S, Tan A-H, Zhu Z (2008) A fast pruned-extreme learning machine for classification problem. Neurocomputing 72:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miche Y, Sorjamaa A, Bas P, Simula O, Jutten C, Lendasse A (2010) OP-ELM: pptimally pruned extreme learning machine. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21:158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lan Y, Soh YC, Huang G-B (2010) Two-stage extreme learning machine for regression. Neurocomputing 73:3028–3038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun J (2010) Local coupled feedforward neural network. Neural Netw 23:108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Jesús Rubio J, Angelov P, Pacheco J (2011) Uniformly stable backpropagation algorithm to train a feedforward neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22:356–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Golmohammadi D, Creese R, Valian H, Kolassa J (2009) Supplier selection based on a neural network model using genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 20:1504–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun J (2012) Learning algorithm and hidden node selection scheme for local coupled feedforward neural network classifier. Neurocomputing 79:158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qu Y, Shang C, Yang J, Wu W, Shen Q (2013) Modified gradient-based learning for local coupled feedforward neural networks with gaussian basis function. Neural Comput Appl 22:379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Radzikowska A, Kerre E (2002) A comparative study of fuzzy rough sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 126:137–155

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shawe-Taylor J, Christianini N (2004) Kernel method for pattern analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2004) Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN2004), vol 2, Budapest, Hungary, pp 985–990

  20. Rao CR, Mitra SK (1971) Generalized inverse of matrices and its applications. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Serre D (2002) Matrices: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Das M, Chakraborty M, Ghoshal T (1998) Fuzzy tolerance relation, fuzzy tolerance space and basis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:361–369

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Genton M (2001) Classes of kernels for machine learning: a statistics perspective. J Mach Learn Res 2:299–312

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jensen R, Shen Q (2009) New approaches to fuzzy-rough feature selection. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:824–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen L, Chen CLP, Pedrycz W (2010) A gradient-descent-based approach for transparent linguistic interface generation in fuzzy models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 40:1219–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blake C, Merz C (1998) UCI repository of machine learning databases. University of California, Irvine

  27. Mike M (1989) Statistical datasets. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qu Y, Shang C, Shen Q, Mac Parthálain N, Wu W (2011) Kernel-based fuzzy-rough nearest neighbour classification. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ), pp 1523–1529

  29. Shang C, Barnes D, Shen Q (2011) Facilitating efficient mars terrain image classification with fuzzy-rough feature selection. Int J Hybrid Intell Syst 8:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61272171), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3132013335) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M541213).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanpeng Qu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qu, Y. Local coupled extreme learning machine. Neural Comput & Applic 27, 27–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1542-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1542-4

Keywords