Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A fault mode identification methodology based on self-organizing map

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main goals of predictive maintenance is to be able to trigger the right maintenance actions at the right moment in time building upon the monitoring of the health status of the concerned systems and their components. As such, it allows identifying incipient faults and forecasting the moment of failure at the earliest stage. Many different data-driven methods are used in such approaches (Naderi and Khorasani in 2017 IEEE 30th Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE), Windsor, ON, IEEE, pp 1–6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccece.2017.7946715; Sarkar et al. in J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1338(8):081602, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002877; Svärd et al. in Mech Syst Signal Process 45(1):170–192, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.11.002; Pourbabaee et al. Mech Syst Signal Process 76–77:136–156, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.023). This work uses the self-organizing maps (SOMs) or Kohonen map, thanks to its ability to emphasize underlying behavior such as fault modes. An automatic fault mode detection is presented based on a SOM network and the kernel density estimation with as less as possible prior knowledge. The different SOM development steps are presented and the suitable solutions proposed to structure the approach are accompanied by mathematical methods. The generated maps are then used with kernel density analysis to isolate fault modes on them. Finally, a methodology is presented to identify the different fault modes. The work is illustrated with an aircraft jet engines case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.

References

  1. Simon DL, Rinehart AW (2014) A model-based anomaly detection approach for analyzing streaming aircraft engine measurement data. In: Volume 6: Ceramics; controls, diagnostics and instrumentation; education; manufacturing materials and metallurgy, Düsseldorf, Germany. ASME, p V006T06A032. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2014-27172

  2. Naderi E, Meskin N, Khorasani K (2012) Nonlinear fault diagnosis of jet engines by using a multiple model-based approach. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 134(1):011602. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeng D, Zhou D, Tan C, Jiang B (2018) Research on model-based fault diagnosis for a gas turbine based on transient performance. Appl Sci 8(1):148. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8010148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naderi E, Khorasani K (2017) Data-driven fault detection, isolation and estimation of aircraft gas turbine engine actuator and sensors. In: 2017 IEEE 30th Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE), Windsor, ON. IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccece.2017.7946715

  5. Sarkar S, Jin X, Ray A (2011) Data-driven fault detection in aircraft engines with noisy sensor measurements. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 133(8):081602. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Svärd C, Nyberg M, Frisk E, Krysander M (2014) Data-driven and adaptive statistical residual evaluation for fault detection with an automotive application. Mech Syst Signal Process 45(1):170–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pourbabaee B, Meskin N, Khorasani K (2016) Robust sensor fault detection and isolation of gas turbine engines subjected to time-varying parameter uncertainties. Mech Syst Signal Process 76–77:136–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Venkatasubramanian V (2005) Prognostic and diagnostic monitoring of complex systems for product lifecycle management: challenges and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 29(6):1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.02.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vingerhoeds RA, Janssens P, Netten BD, Aznar Fernández-Montesinos M (1995) Enhancing off-line and on-line condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Control Eng Pract 3(11):1515–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(95)00162-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Montero Jimenez JJ, Vingerhoeds R (2018) Enhancing operational fault diagnosis by assessing multiple operational modes. In: MOSIM’18—Conférence Internationale de Modélisation, Optimisation et Simulation, Toulouse

  11. Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern 43(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Germen E, Başaran M, Fidan M (2014) Sound based induction motor fault diagnosis using Kohonen self-organizing map. Mech Syst Signal Process 46(1):45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Côme E, Cottrell M, Verleysen M, Lacaille J (2010) Aircraft engine health monitoring using self-organizing maps. In: Perner P (ed) Advances in data mining. Springer, Berlin, pp 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14400-4_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Cottrell M, Gaubert P, Eloy C, François D, Hallaux G, Lacaille J, Verleysen M (2009) Fault prediction in aircraft engines using self-organizing maps. In: Príncipe JC, Miikkulainen R (eds) Advances in self-organizing maps, vol 5629. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02397-2_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Katunin A, Amarowicz M, Chrzanowski P (2015) Faults diagnosis using self-organizing maps: a case study on the DAMADICS benchmark problem, pp 1673–1681. https://doi.org/10.15439/2015f26

  16. Yu H, Khan F, Garaniya V (2015) Risk-based fault detection using self-organizing map. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 139:82–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen X, Yan X (2012) Using improved self-organizing map for fault diagnosis in chemical industry process. Chem Eng Res Des 90(12):2262–2277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2012.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dharshini R, Hemanandhini S (2016) Brain tumor segmentation based on self organising map and discrete wavelet transform. In: 2016 international conference on computer communication and informatics (ICCCI), Coimbatore, India. IEEE, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccci.2016.7479960

  19. Peel L (2008) Data driven prognostics using a Kalman filter ensemble of neural network models. In: 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management. https://doi.org/10.1109/phm.2008.4711423

  20. Jolliffe I (2011) Principal component analysis. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98835

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sammon JW (1969) A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans Comput 100(5):401–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/t-c.1969.222678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang T, Jianbo Y, Siegel D, Lee JA (2008) Similarity-based prognostics approach for remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems. In: 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management. IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/phm.2008.4711421

  23. Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3:1157–1182

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jovic A, Brkic K, Bogunovic N (2015) A review of feature selection methods with applications. In: 2015 38th international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia. IEEE, pp 1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1109/mipro.2015.7160458

  25. Saeys Y, Inza I, Larranaga P (2007) A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 23(19):2507–2517. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Visalakshi S, Radha V (2014) A literature review of feature selection techniques and applications: review of feature selection in data mining. In 2014 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research. IEEE, Coimbatore, India, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccic.2014.7238499

  27. Kohonen T (1997) Springer series in information sciences, vol 30. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97966-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Kohonen T (2014) Unigrafia, Helsinki, Finland

  29. Zin ZM (2014) Cluster and visualize data using 3D self-organizing maps. In: 2014 11th international conference on ubiquitous robots and ambient intelligence (URAI). IEEE, pp 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/urai.2014.7057523

  30. Azcarraga A, Manalili S (2011) Design of a structured 3D SOM as a music archive, pp 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21566-7_19

  31. Gorricha J, Lobo V (2012) Improvements on the visualization of clusters in geo-referenced data using self-organizing maps. Comput Geosci 43:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. El Tobely T, Salem A (2005) Position detection of unexploded ordnance from airborne magnetic anomaly data using 3-D self organized feature map. In: Proceedings of the fifth IEEE international symposium on signal processing and information technology, 2005. IEEE, pp 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1109/isspit.2005.1577117

  33. Fujimura K, Masuda K, Fukui Y (2006) A consideration on the multi-dimensional topology in self-organizing maps. In: 2006 international symposium on intelligent signal processing and communications, IEEE, pp 825–828. https://doi.org/10.1109/ispacs.2006.364772

  34. Côme E, Cottrell M, Verleysen M, Lacaille J (2010) Self organizing star (SOS) for health monitoring. In: European conference on artificial neural networks, pp 99–104

  35. Tian J, Azarian MH, Pecht M (2014) Anomaly detection using self-organizing maps-based k-nearest neighbor algorithm. In: European conference of the prognostics and health management society

  36. Engelbrecht AP (2007) Computational intelligence: an introduction, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470512517

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Su M-C, Liu T-K, Chang H-T (1999) An efficient initialization scheme for the self-organizing feature map algorithm. In: IJCNN’99. International joint conference on neural networks. Proceedings (Cat. No. 99CH36339), vol 3. IEEE, pp 1906–1910. https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn.1999.832672

  38. Kohonen T (2001) Springer series in information sciences, vol 30, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaski S, Venna J, Kohonen T (2000) Coloring that reveals cluster structures in multivariate data. Aust J Intell Inf Process Syst 6:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alahakoon D, Halgamuge SK, Srinivasan B (2000) Dynamic self-organizing maps with controlled growth for knowledge discovery. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 11(3):601–614. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Natita W, Wiboonsak W, Dusadee S (2016) Appropriate learning rate and neighborhood function of self-organizing map (SOM) for specific humidity pattern classification over Southern Thailand. Int J Model Optim 6(1):61–65. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMO.2016.V6.504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang W, Wang J, Jin D, Oreopoulos L, Zhang Z (2018) A deterministic self-organizing map approach and its application on satellite data based cloud type classification. In: Conference IEEE Big Data

  43. Saxena A, Goebel K, Simon D, Eklund N (2008) Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. In: 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management. IEEE, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/phm.2008.4711414

  44. Kafadar K, Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1999) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the kernel approach with S-PLUS. J Am Stat Assoc 94(447):982. https://doi.org/10.2307/2670015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations, vol 18. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Frederick DK, DeCastro JA, Litt JS (2007) User’s guide for the commercial modular aero-propulsion system simulation (C-MAPSS)

  47. Hu C, Youn BD, Wang P, Taek Yoon J (2012) Ensemble of data-driven prongostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 103:120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fusco G, Perez J (2019) Bayesian network clustering and self-organizing maps under the test of Indian Districts. A comparison. Cybergeo. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.31909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang X, Yao L, Wang X, Monaghan J, Mcalpine D, Zhang Y (2019) Cs Eess Q-Bio. arXiv:1905.04149

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author affiliated to Sogeti High Tech and ISAE-SUPAERO gratefully acknowledges his colleagues who provided insight and expertise through this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SOGETI High Tech, R&D Dpt., Aeropark, 3 Chemin de Laporte, 31100, Toulouse, France

    Sébastien Schwartz

  2. ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, 10 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400, Toulouse, France

    Sébastien Schwartz, Juan José Montero Jimenez, Michel Salaün & Rob Vingerhoeds

  3. Tecnológico de Costa Rica Institute of Technology, Calle 15, Avenida 14., 1 km Sur de la Basílica de los Ángeles, Provincia de Cartago, Cartago, 30101, Costa Rica

    Juan José Montero Jimenez

Authors
  1. Sébastien Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan José Montero Jimenez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel Salaün
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rob Vingerhoeds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Schwartz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sébastien Schwartz, Juan José Montero Jimenez, Michel Salaün and Rob Vingerhoeds declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwartz, S., Montero Jimenez, J.J., Salaün, M. et al. A fault mode identification methodology based on self-organizing map. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 13405–13423 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04692-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04692-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation