Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trains of thought on the tabletop: visualizing association of ideas improves creativity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the Search for Ideas in Associative Memory theory, ideas in a brainstorming session do not come one by one but rather in “trains of thought,” which are rapid accumulations of semantically related ideas. In order to visualize these trains of thought, we developed a brainwriting tabletop interface enabling users to link successive ideas together by means of graphical ropes. To test the effectiveness of this device, 48 participants (in groups of four) brainstormed for 20 min on the tabletop in one of two conditions: either with the train-of-thought interface (with graphical ropes), or without the ropes (control condition). The results show that visualizing the associations between ideas enabled the participants to produce longer trains of thought. We also assessed originality by collecting the unique ideas in the whole corpus of ideas produced by the different groups and observed that the train-of-thought condition produced more original ideas than the control one. One interpretation of this finding is that visualizing trains of thought increases cognitive stimulation, i.e., improves creativity by making others’ ideas more intelligible to the brainstorming partners, in comparison with the classical visualization of ideas as independent items.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Shen C, Ryall K, Forlines C, Esenther A, Vernier F, Everitt K, Wu M, Wigdor D, Ringel Morris M, Hancock M, Tse E (2006) Informing the design of direct-touch tabletops. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott SD, Carpendale S (2006) Interacting with digital tabletops. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hartmann B, Ringel Morris M, Benko H, Wilson AD (2010) Pictionaire: supporting collaborative design work by integrating physical and digital artifacts. In: CSCW’10 international conference on computer-supported cooperative work, 2010. ACM Press, pp 421–424

  4. Hilliges O, Terrenghi L, Boring S, Kim D, Richter H, Butz A (2007) Designing for collaborative creative problem solving. In: C&C’07 international conference on creativity and cognition. ACM Press, pp 137–146

  5. Streitz NA, Geißler J, Holmer T, Konomi S (1999) I-LAND, an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In: CHI’99 international conference on human factors in computing systems, 1999. ACM Press, pp 120–127

  6. Warr A, O’Neill E (2006) Public social private design (PSPD). In: CHI’06 international conference on human factors in computing systems, 2006. ACM Press, pp 1499–1504

  7. Buisine S, Besacier G, Aoussat A, Vernier F (2012) How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Comput Hum Behav 28:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmitt L, Buisine S, Chaboissier J, Aoussat A, Vernier F (2012) Dynamic tabletop interfaces for increasing creativity. Comput Hum Behav 28:1892–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Osborn AF (1953) Applied Imagination. Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons, Oxford, England

  10. Dugosh KL, Paulus PB (2005) Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. J Exp Soc Psychol 41:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dugosh KL, Paulus PB, Roland EJ, Yang HC (2000) Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(5):722–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2002) Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: exposure effects in an idea generation task. J Exp Soc Psychol 38:535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bartis S, Szymanski K, Harkins SG (1988) Evaluation and performance: a two-edged knife. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 14:242–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harkins SG, Jackson JM (1985) The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 11(4):457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michinov N, Primois C (2005) Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: new evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Comput Hum Behav 21:11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paulus PB, Dzindolet MT (1993) Social influence processes in group brainstorming. J Pers Soc Psychol 64(4):575–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. J Pers Soc Psychol 53(3):497–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heslin PA (2009) Better than brainstorming? Potential boundary conditions to brainwriting for idea generation in organizations. J Occup Organ Psychol 82:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paulus PB, Yang HC (2000) Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82:76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harkins SG, Szymanski K (1988) Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard. J Exp Soc Psychol 24:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karau SJ, Hart JW (1998) Group cohesiveness and social loafing: effect of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 2:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Karau SJ, Williams KD (1993) Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:681–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Serva MA, Fuller MA (1997) Preventing social loafing in the collaborative technology classroom. In: SIGCPR’97, 1997. ACM Press, pp 84–86

  24. Woolley AN, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330:686–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brickner MA, Harkins SG, Ostrom TM (1986) Effects of personal involvement: thought-provoking implications for social loafing. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shepperd JA (1993) Productivity loss in performance groups: a motivation analysis. Psychol Bull 113:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10:186–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2003) Production blocking and idea generation: does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? J Exp Soc Psychol 39:531–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stroebe W, Nijstad BA, Rietzschel EF (2010) Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: the evolution of a question. In: Zanna MP, Olson JM (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 43. Academic Press, New York, pp 157–203

  30. Raaijmakers JGW, Shiffrin RM (1981) Search of associative memory. Psychol Rev 88:93–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rietzschel EF, Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2007) Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: the effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. J Exp Soc Psychol 43:933–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol Rev 69:220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dietz PH, Leigh D DiamondTouch (2001) A multi-user touch technology. In: UIST’01 international conference on user interface software and technology, 2001. ACM Press, pp 219–226

  34. Shen C, Vernier F, Forlines C, Ringel M (2004) DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In: CHI’04 international conference on human factors in computing systems, 2004. ACM Press, pp 167–174

  35. Buisine S, Besacier G, Najm M, Aoussat A, Vernier F (2007) Computer-supported creativity: evaluation of a tabletop mind-map application. In: HCII’07 human computer interaction international, 2007. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, pp 22–31

  36. Brandl P, Forlines C, Wigdor D, Haller M, Shen C (2008) Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces. In: AVI’08 international conference on advanced visual interfaces, 2008. pp 154–161

  37. Geyer F, Pfeil U, Budzinski J, Höchtl A, Reiterer H (2011) AffinityTable—a hybrid surface for supporting affinity diagramming. In: INTERACT’11 IFIP conference on human-computer interaction, 2011. Springer, pp 477–484

  38. DeRosa DM, Smith CL, Hantula DA (2007) The medium matters: mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Comput Hum Behav 23:1549–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gallupe RB, Bastianutti LM, Cooper WH (1991) Unblocking brainstorms. J Appl Psychol 76(1):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McLaughlin Hymes C, Olson GM (1992) Unblocking brainstorming through the use of a simple group editor. In: CSCW’92 international conference on computer-supported cooperative work, 1992. ACM Press, pp 99–106

  41. Valacich JS, Dennis AR, Connolly T (1994) Idea generation in computer-based groups: a new ending to an old story. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 57:448–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Runco MA (2004) Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol 55:657–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Torrance EP (1966) The torrance tests of creative thinking. Personnel Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  44. Paulus PB, Kohn NW, Arditti LE, Korde RM (2013) Understanding the group size effect in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research 44:332–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hayfa Tebourbi who designed the first version of the interface, Constant Touchard and Jean-Baptiste Dumay who participated in the experiment setup as well as Julien Nelson for his helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arts et Métiers ParisTech, LCPI, 151 Bd Hopital, 75013, Paris, France

    Amandine Afonso Jaco, Stéphanie Buisine, Jessy Barré & Améziane Aoussat

  2. LIMSI-CNRS, BP 133, 91403, Orsay Cedex, France

    Frédéric Vernier

Authors
  1. Amandine Afonso Jaco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stéphanie Buisine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jessy Barré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Améziane Aoussat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frédéric Vernier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphanie Buisine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Afonso Jaco, A., Buisine, S., Barré, J. et al. Trains of thought on the tabletop: visualizing association of ideas improves creativity. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 1159–1167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0726-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0726-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation