Abstract
The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate different restorative concepts for posterior resin composite fillings in terms of internal adaptation and overhang formation. Eighty standard occluso-distal cavities with and without a 1.5-mm bevel were restored in a phantom head using Syntac Classic and Tetric Ceram with and without Tetric Flow as thin lining or Solid Bond and Solitaire with and without FlowLine. The restorations were finished intraorally and afterwards subjected to thermal loading (1150× +5°C/+55°C) for 24 h. The proximal margins of the original specimens were analyzed for overhangs under a stereo light microscope (100-fold magnification) before and after intraoral control with loupes, including additional polish. Afterwards the teeth were cut longitudinally, replicated, and their internal integrity analyzed under a SEM (200-fold magnification). The combination of flowable and viscous composites resulted in enhanced internal adaptation for both adhesive systems. However, Syntac Classic exhibited superior adaptation characteristics compared with Solid Bond. In terms of overhang formation, the use of flowable materials always led to higher percentages of marginal overhangs in beveled cavities. Higher viscous materials alone resulted in higher percentages of underfilled margins of beveled than box-shaped cavities. It was clear that the use of magnifying glasses during finishing was beneficial for reducing marginal overhangs up to 40%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 24 June 1999 / Accepted: 24 August 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frankenberger, R., Krämer, N., Pelka, M. et al. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct class II resin composite restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations 3, 208–215 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050103
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050103