Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Obtaining accurate classifiers with Pareto-optimal and near Pareto-optimal rules

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the field of data mining, confidence and support are often used to measure the quality of a rule. Pareto-optimal rules, which are Pareto-optimal in terms of confidence and support maximization, have an interesting characteristic that Pareto-optimal rules maximize other various rule evaluation criteria. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of designing classifiers from Pareto-optimal rules. We consider not only Pareto-optimal rules but also near Pareto-optimal rules. To show the effectiveness, we compare classifiers obtained from Pareto-optimal and near Pareto-optimal rules with classifiers obtained from the rules that have large value in terms of other different rule evaluation criteria. Eight criteria are examined in this paper: CF, confidence, cover, Laplace, lift, random, slave, support. Through computational experiments, we show that classifiers obtained from Pareto-optimal rules have higher accuracy than those from rules extracted according to the other criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.

References

  1. Bayardo RJ Jr, Agrawal R (1999) Mining the most interesting rules. In: Proceedings of 5th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 145–153

  2. Ishibuchi H, Kuwajima I, Nojima Y (2007) Prescreening of candidate rules using association rule mining and Pareto-optimality in genetic rule selection. In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, pp 86–93

  3. Ishibuchi H, Yamamoto T (2005) Rule weight specification in fuzzy rule-based classification systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems 13(4):428–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez A, Perez R (1999) SLAVE: a genetic leaning system based on an iterative approach. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems 7(2):176–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evolutionary Computation 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elomaa T, Rousu J (1999) General and efficient multisplitting of numerical attributes. Machine Learning 36(3):201–244

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isao Kuwajima.

Additional information

This work was presented in part and awarded as Young Author Award at the 13th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita, Japan, January 31–February 2, 2008

About this article

Cite this article

Kuwajima, I., Nojima, Y. & Ishibuchi, H. Obtaining accurate classifiers with Pareto-optimal and near Pareto-optimal rules. Artif Life Robotics 13, 315–319 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-008-0544-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-008-0544-2

Key words