Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

From rigid to soft to biological robots

How new materials are driving advances in the study of the embodied cognition

  • Invited Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For much of the history of robotics, robots have been built from inert, inorganic, bulk material, such as metals, plastics, and ceramics. However, advances in materials science are driving the development of soft robots made from increasingly exotic but still inorganic materials. Similarly, synthetic biology has recently provided the ability to build ‘biobots’ completely from biological materials. This is driven new use cases for mobile robots, but it is also allowing new questions to be posed about how both body plan and neural control jointly facilitate the evolution of intelligent behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blackiston D, Lederer E, Kriegman S, Garnier S, Bongard J (2021) Levin M A cellular platform for the development of synthetic living machines. Sci Robot 6(52):eabf1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bongard J (2009) Accelerating self-modeling in cooperative robot teams. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(2):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bongard J, Levin M (2022) There’s plenty of room right here: Biological systems as evolved, overloaded, multi-scale machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10675

  4. Bongard J, Zykov V, Lipson H (2006) Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling. Science 314:1118–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bongard JC (2011) Morphological and environmental scaffolding synergize when evolving robot controllers: artificial life/robotics/evolvable hardware. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pp. 179–186. ACM

  6. Cully A, Clune J, Tarapore D, Mouret JB (2015) Robots that can adapt like animals. Nature 521(7553):503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gumuskaya G, Srivastava P, Cooper BG, Lesser H, Semegran B, Garnier S, Levin M (2022) Motile living biobots self-construct from adult human somatic progenitor seed cells. bioRxiv 34 https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.04.502707

  8. Kriegman S, Blackiston D, Levin M, Bongard J (2020) A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms. Proc Nat Acad Sci 117(4):1853–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kriegman S, Blackiston D, Levin M (2021) Bongard J Kinematic self-replication in reconfigurable organisms. Proc Nat Acad Sci 118(49):e2112672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kriegman S, Walker S, Shah D, Levin M, Kramer-Bottiglio R, Bongard J (2019) Automated shapeshifting for function recovery in damaged robots. In: Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) Conference

  11. Lee KY, Park SJ, Matthews DG, Kim SL, Marquez CA, Zimmerman JF, Ardoña HAM, Kleber AG, Lauder GV, Parker KK (2022) An autonomously swimming biohybrid fish designed with human cardiac biophysics. Science 375(6581):639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin Z, Jiang T, Shang J (2022) The emerging technology of biohybrid micro-robots: a review. Bio-Design Manufact 11:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazzolai B (2020) Laschi C A vision for future bioinspired and biohybrid robots. Sci Robot 5(38):eaba6893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nygaard TF, Martin CP, Samuelsen E, Torresen J, Glette K (2018) Real-world evolution adapts robot morphology and control to hardware limitations. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 125–132

  15. Park SJ, Gazzola M, Park KS, Park S, Di Santo V, Blevins EL, Lind JU, Campbell PH, Dauth S, Capulli AK et al (2016) Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray. Science 353(6295):158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsa A, Wang D, O’Hern CS, Shattuck MD, Kramer-Bottiglio R, Bongard J (2022) Evolving programmable computational metamaterials. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 122–129

  17. Sun L, Yu Y, Chen Z, Bian F, Ye F, Sun L, Zhao Y (2020) Biohybrid robotics with living cell actuation. Chem Soc Rev 49(12):4043–4069

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work involved biobots discussed herein was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under Cooperative Agreement Number HR0011-18-2-0022, the Lifelong Learning Machines program from DARPA/MTO. The content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the government, and no official endorsement should be inferred. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The metamaterials work was supported by the National Science Foundation under the DMREF program (award number: 2118810).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josh Bongard.

Additional information

This work was presented in part as a plenary speech at the joint symposium of the 28th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, the 8th International Symposium on BioComplexity, and the 6th International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (Beppu, Oita, and Online, January 25–27, 2023).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bongard, J. From rigid to soft to biological robots. Artif Life Robotics 28, 282–286 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00872-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00872-0

Keywords