Abstract
Water inrush in karst tunnels is a dynamic process in which internal and external factors are involved. The evaluation of this process is fuzzy, complex, and uncertain. In the current research, few articles give full consideration to the fuzziness and randomness of the water inrush evaluation with useful dynamic feedback. A new assessment method has been proposed for the water inrush evaluation based on a combination of the weighting method and normal cloud model. Specifically, an evaluation index system is forged and each index is quantitatively classified into four grades. A synthetic weighted algorithm combining the analytic hierarchy process, entropy method, and statistical methods is proposed to assign the index weight rationally. Based on the cloud generator algorithm, three numerical characteristics are calculated and a sufficient number of cloud droplets are generated. The membership degree of each index belonging to each grade is constructed and the integrated certain grades are determined. In this paper, the multi-factor normal cloud assessment method is applied to the risk assessment of the Qiyueshan tunnel. The assessment result of the risk grade is accurate, that is, the water inrush risk of different samples at the same risk grade can be reflected in figures. The results not only show high consistency with other assessment methods but are also in good agreement with the excavation results. The proposed cloud model method demonstrates good practical reference for risk assessment of tunnel construction in karst areas and can be applied to tunneling, mining, and other engineering practices in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bu L, Li S, Shi S, Li L, Zhao Y, Zhou Z et al (2017). Application of the comprehensive forecast system for water-bearing structures in a karst tunnel: a case study. Bull Eng Geol Environ (4):1–17
Cui QL, Wu HN, Shen SL, Xu YS, Ye GL (2015) Chinese karst geology and measures to prevent geo-hazards during shield tunneling in karst region with caves. Nat Hazards 77(1):129–152
Hao Y, Rong X, Ma L, Fan P, Lu H (2016) Uncertainty analysis on risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels. Math Probl Eng 2016(2):1–11
Jakiel P, Fabianowski D (2015) FAHP model used for assessment of highway RC bridge structural and technological arrangements. Expert Syst Appl 42(8):4054–4061
Li X, Li Y (2014) Research on risk assessment system for water inrush in the karst tunnel construction based on Gis: case study on the diversion tunnel groups of the Jinping II hydropower station. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 40(2):182–191
Li D, Liu C, Gan W (2010) A new cognitive model: cloud model. Int J Intell Syst 24(3):357–375
Li L, Li SC, Chen J, Li JL, Xu ZH, Shi SS (2011) Construction license mechanism and its application based on karst water inrush risk evaluation. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(7):1345–1354
Li ZL, Wang XH, Xie LZ (2012) Risk evaluation and comprehensive geological prediction based on fuzzy wavelet neural network during tunneling in karst area. Geoscience 27(3):719–726
Li SC, Zhou ZQ, Li LP, Xu ZH, Zhang QQ, Shi SS (2013) Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels based on attribute synthetic evaluation system. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 38:50–58
Li L, Lei T, Li S, Zhang Q, Xu Z, Shi S, Zhou Z (2015) Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels and software development. Arab J Geosci 8(4):1843–1854
Li SC, Wu J, Xu ZH, Li LP (2017a) Unascertained measure model of water and mud inrush risk evaluation in karst tunnels and its engineering application. KSCE J Civ Eng 21:1–13
Li X, Zhang P, He Z, Huang Z, Cheng M, Guo L (2017b) Identification of geological structure which induced heavy water and mud inrush in tunnel excavation: a case study on lingjiao tunnel. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 69:203–208
Liang DX, Jiang ZQ, Zhu SY, Sun Q, Qian ZW (2016) Experimental research on water inrush in tunnel construction. Nat Hazards 81(1):467–480
Liu HC, You JX, You XY, Shan MM (2015) A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy vikor method. Appl Soft Comput 28(C):579–588
Lyu HM et al (2018a) Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
Lyu HM et al (2018b) Assessment of geohazards and preventative countermeasures using AHP incorporated with GIS in Lanzhou. Chin Sustainabil 10(2):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020304
Moon J, Fernandez G (2010) Effect of excavation-induced groundwater level drawdown on tunnel inflow in a jointed rock mass. Eng Geol 110(3–4):33–42
Saaty TL (2003) Decision-making with the ahp: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res 145(1):85–91
Shen SL, Wu HN, Cui YJ, Yin ZY (2014) Long-term settlement behaviour of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of shanghai. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 40:309–323
Shen SL, Cui QL, Ho CE, Xu YS (2016) Ground response to multiple parallel microtunneling operations in cemented silty clay and sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(5):04016001
Shin JH (2010) Analytical and combined numerical methods evaluating pore water pressure on tunnels. Géotechnique 60(2):141–145
Tudes S, Yigiter ND (2010) Preparation of land use planning model using gis based on ahp: case study Adana-Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69(2):235–245
Wang Y, Yang W, Li M, Liu X (2012) Risk assessment of floor water inrush in coal mines based on secondary fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 52(6):50–55
Wang G, Xu C, Li D (2014) Generic normal cloud model. Inf Sci 280:1–15
Wang Y, Jing H, Yu L, Su H, Luo N (2017a) Set pair analysis for risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76(3):1199–1207
Wang XT, Li SC, Ma XY, Xue YG, Hu J, Li ZQ (2017b) Risk assessment of rockfall hazards in a tunnel portal section based on normal cloud model. Pol J Environ Stud 26(5):2295–2306
Wu Q, Fan S, Zhou W, Liu S (2013) Application of the analytic hierarchy process to assessment of water inrush: a case study for the no. 17 coal seam in the Sanhejian coal mine, China. Mine Water Environ 32(3):229–238
Wu HN, Shen SL, Liao SM, Yin ZY (2015) Longitudinal structural modelling of shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation between segmental rings. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol Incorp Trench Technol Res 50:317–323
Xu ZH, Li SC, Li LP et al (2011a) Risk assessment of water or mud inrush of karst tunnels based on analytic hierarchy process. Rock Soil Mech 32(6):1757–1766
Xu ZH, Li SC, Li LP et al (2011b) Construction permit mechanism of karst tunnels based on dynamic assessment and management of risk. Chin J Geotech Eng 33(11):1714–1725
Yazdani CA (2014) Proposing a new methodology based on fuzzy logic for tunnelling risk assessment. J Civ Eng Manag 20(1):82–94
Yin S, Zhang J, Liu D (2015) A study of mine water inrushes by measurements of in situ stress and rock failures. Nat Hazards 79(3):1961–1979
Zainal SFFS, Ismail MAM, Mostafa R et al (2016) Hydrogeochemistry of tunnel seepage water along the contact of zone of metasedimentary and granitic rock within the Pahang–Selangor raw water transfer tunnel project, Malaysia. Arab J Geosci 9(4):1–11
Zhang W, Chen JP, Wang Q, An Y, Qian X, Xiang L et al (2013) Susceptibility analysis of large-scale debris flows based on combination weighting and extension methods. Nat Hazards 66(2):1073–1100
Zhang G, Zhang K, Wang L, Wu Y (2015) Mechanism of water inrush and quicksand movement induced by a borehole and measures for prevention and remediation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74(4):1–11
Zhong FP, Li DY, Zhang W, Huang BR (2008) Analysis of water leakage during construction of Qingshangang tunnel and study of leakage treatment measures. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering 4(1):190–194
Zhu B, Wu L, Peng Y, Zhou W, Chen C (2018) Risk assessment of water inrush in tunnel through water-rich fault. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):317–326
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.s: 51509147, 51379112), the promotive research fund for excellent young and middle-aged scientists of Shandong Province (Grant No.: BS2014NJ004) and The Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (Grant No.s: 2017JC002, 2017JC001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
A. The Normal Cloud Generator
Input: Three numerical characteristics of the cloud model (Ex, En, He) and the number of cloud drops N;
Output:N cloud drops and their certainty degree μ(xi).
Steps:
-
(a)
Generate a normally distributed random number En' with expectation En and standard deviation He: En'~N(En, He2);
-
(b)
Generate a normally distributed random number xi with expectation Ex and standard deviation En': xi~N(Ex, En'2);
-
(c)
Calculate the certainty degree: \( \mu \left({x}_i\right)={e}^{-\frac{{\left({x}_i-{E}_{xi}\right)}^2}{2{\left({E_n}^{\hbox{'}}\right)}^2}} \);
-
(d)
Generate a cloud drop with the certainty degree μ(xi) and the normally random number xi;
-
(e)
Repeat steps (a) to (d) until n required cloud drops are generated.
B. The subjective weight calculation program based on AHP
clear.
close all.
clc
tic
disp(‘please input Matrix A’).
A = input(‘A = \n’);
[n,n] = size(A);
x = ones(n,100);
y = ones(n,100);
m = zeros(1100);
m(1) = max(x(:,1));
y(:,1) = x(:,1);
x(:,2) = A*y(:,1);
m(2) = max(x(:,2));
y(:,2) = x(:,2)/m(1);
p = 0.0001;
i = 2;
k = abs(m(2)-m(1));
while k > p;
i = i + 1;
x(:,i) = A*y(:,i-1);
m(i) = max(x(:,i));
y(:,i) = x(:,i)/m(i);
k = abs(m(i)-m(i-1));
end
a = sum(y(:,i));
w = y(:,i)/a;
t = m(i);
disp(‘w = ‘).
disp(w).
%fprintf(‘w = %f\n’,w);
fprintf(‘t = \n %f\n’,t);
CI = (t-n)/(n-1);
RI = [0 0 .58 .90 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41 1.45 1.49 1.51];
CR = CI/RI(n);
if CR < 0.1;
disp(‘CI = ‘).
disp(CI).
disp(‘RI = ‘).
disp(RI(n)).
disp(‘CR = ‘).
disp(CR).
fprintf(‘\n CR < 0.1\n\n’);
disp(‘Success’).
else disp(‘Fail’).
end
toc
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Li, S., Xu, Z. et al. Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels excavation based on normal cloud model. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 3783–3798 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1294-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1294-6