Abstract
Customer service measures are traditionally used to determine the performance or/and the control parameters of any inventory system. Among them, the fill rate is one of the most widely used in practice and is defined as the fraction of demand that is immediately met from shelf i.e. from the available on-hand stock. However, this definition itself set out several problems that lead to consider two different approaches to compute the fill rate: the traditional, which computes the fill rate in terms of units short; and the standard, which directly computes the expected satisfied demand. This paper suggest two expressions, the traditional and the standard, to compute the fill rate in the continuous reorder point, order quantity (s, Q) policy following these approaches. Experimental results shows that the traditional approach is biased since underestimate the real fill rate whereas the standard computes it accurately and therefore both approaches cannot be treated as equivalent. This paper focuses on the lost sales context and discrete distributed demands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal V, Seshadri S (2000) Distribution free bounds for service constrained (Q, r) inventory systems. Nav Res Logist 47:635–656
Axsäter S (2000) Inventory control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell
Axsäter S (2006) A simple procedure for determining order quantities under a fill rate constraint and normally distributed lead-time demand. Eur J Oper Res 174:480–491
Bijvank M, Vis IFA (2011) Lost-sales inventory theory: a review. Eur J Oper Res 215:1–13
Bijvank M, Vis IFA (2012) Lost-sales inventory systems with a service level criterion. Eur J Oper Res 220:610–618
Breugelmans E, Campo K, Gijsbrechts E (2006) Opportunities for active stock-out management in online stores: the impact of the stock-out policy on online stock-out reactions. J Retail 82:215–228
Diels JL, Wiebach N (2011) Customer reactions in out-of-stock situations: Do promotion-induced phantom positions alleviate the similarity substitution hypothsis? Berlin: SFB 649 Discussion paper 2011-021
Grinstead CM, Snell JL (1997) Introduction to probability. American Mathematical Society, Providence
Gruen TW, Corsten D, Bharadwaj S (2002) Retail out-of-stocks: A worldwide examination of extent causes, rates and consumer responses. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Washington
Guijarro E, Cardós M, Babiloni E (2012) On the exact calculation of the fill rate in a periodic review inventory policy under discrete demand patterns. Eur J Oper Res 218:442–447
Platt DE, Robinson LW, Freund RB (1997) Tractable (Q, R) heuristic models for constrained service levels. Manag Sci 43:951–965
Silver EA (1970) A modified formula for calculating customer service under continuous inventory review. AIIE T 2:241–245
Silver EA, Pyke DF, Peterson R (1998) Inventory management and production planning and scheduling. Wiley, Hoboken
Tempelmeier H (2007) On the stochastic uncapacitated dynamic single-item lotsizing problem with service level constraints. Eur J Oper Res 181:184–194
Vincent P (1983) Practical methods for accurate fill rates. INFOR 21:109–120
Zipkin P (2008a) Old and new methods for lost-sales inventory systems. Oper Res 56:1256–1263
Zipkin P (2008b) On the structure of lost-sales inventory models. Oper Res 56:937–944
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund and Spanish Government (MINECO/FEDER, UE) under the Project with reference DPI2015-64133-R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babiloni, E., Guijarro, E. Fill rate: from its definition to its calculation for the continuous (s, Q) inventory system with discrete demands and lost sales. Cent Eur J Oper Res 28, 35–43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0546-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0546-7