Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Evaluation of human melanoma and normal formalin paraffin-fixed samples using Raman and LIBS fused data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, we developed a novel method of quantitative analysis to increase the detection potential for screening and classification of skin cancer (melanoma). We fused two distinct optical approaches, an atomic spectroscopic detection technique laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and a vibrational molecular spectroscopic technique known as Raman spectroscopy. Melanoma is a kind of skin cancer, also known as malignant melanoma, that developed in melanocytes cells, which produced melanin. Classification of melanoma cancerous tissues is a fundamental problem in biomedicine. For early melanoma cancer diagnosis and treatment, precise and accurate categorizing is critically essential. Laser-based spectroscopic approaches can be used as an operating instrument for simultaneous tissue ablation and ablated tissue elemental and molecular analysis. For this purpose, melanoma and normal paraffin-embedded tissues are used as a sample for LIBS and Raman measurement. We studied the data provided by laser-based spectroscopic methods using different machine learning classification techniques of extreme learning machine (ELM), partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and K nearest neighbors (kNN). For visualization of melanoma and normal data, principal component analysis (PCA) is also used. Three different ways are used to process the data, LIBS measurement, Raman measurement, and combine data measurement (merged/fused data), and then compared the results. ELM classification model achieved the highest accuracy (100%) for combined data as well as for Raman and LIBS data, respectively. According to the experimental results, we can assume that Raman spectroscopy and LIBS combine can significantly improve the identification and classification accuracy of melanoma and normal specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassanpour S H and Dehghani M 2017 Review of cancer from perspective of molecular J. Cancer Res. Pract.

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019 CA. Cancer J Clin 69:7–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Larson AR, Konat E, Alani RM (2009) Melanoma biomarkers: current status and vision for the future. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 6:105–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao S-Y, Aurelio ON, Zavada KJJ, Stanbridge EJ (1997) Identification of the MN/CA9 protein as a reliable diagnostic biomarker of clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. Cancer Res 57:2827–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Km MS, Tamboli MM, Devangad P, U VK, George SD, Kartha VB (2017) Conventional and standoff pulsed laser–Raman–echelle–time‐gated (PRET) system. J Raman Spectrosc 48:785–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamboli MM, Unnikrishnan VK, Nayak R, Devangad P, Shameem KMM, Kartha VB, Santhosh C (2016) Development of a Stand-off Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (ST-LIBS) system for the analysis of complex matrices. J Instrum 11:P08021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Unnikrishnan VK, Alti K, Nayak R, Bernard R, Khetarpal N, Kartha VB, Santhosh C, Gupta GP, Suri BM (2010) Optimized LIBS setup with echelle spectrograph-ICCD system for multi-elemental analysis. J Instrum 5:P04005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Radziemski LJ (2002) From LASER to LIBS, the path of technology development Spectrochim. Acta Part B At Spectrosc 57:1109–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kearton B, Mattley Y (2008) Sparking new applications. Nat Photonics 2:537–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Syvilay D 2016 Evaluation of LIBS LIF Raman spectroscopies to analyze materials from cultural heritage

  11. Blacksberg J, Maruyama Y, Choukroun M, Charbon E and Rossman G R 2012 New microscopic laser-coupled spectroscopy instrument combining Raman, LIBS, and fluorescence for planetary surface mineralogy LPI 1510

  12. Cremers D A and Radziemski L J 2013 Handbook of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (John Wiley & Sons)

  13. VS D, George S D, Kartha V B and Chidangil S 2020 Hybrid LIBS-Raman-LIF systems for multi-modal spectroscopic applications: a topical review Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 1–29

  14. Lin Q, Niu G, Wang Q, Yu Q, Duan Y (2013) Combined laser-induced breakdown with Raman spectroscopy: historical technology development and recent applications Appl. Spectrosc Rev 48:487–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tu Q, Chang C (2012) Diagnostic applications of Raman spectroscopy Nanomedicine Nanotechnology. Biol Med 8:545–558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan M N, Wang Q, Idrees B S, Teng G, Cui X and Wei K 2020 Discrimination of melanoma using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy conducted on human tissue samples J. Spectrosc.

  17. Han JH, Moon Y, Lee JJ, Choi S, Kim Y-C, Jeong S (2016) Differentiation of cutaneous melanoma from surrounding skin using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy Biomed. Opt Express 7:57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Busser B, Moncayo S, Coll JL, Sancey L, Motto-Ros V (2018) Elemental imaging using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: a new and promising approach for biological and medical applications Coord. Chem Rev 358:70–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hare D, Burger F, Austin C, Fryer F, Grimm R, Reedy B, Scolyer R A, Thompson F and Doble P 2009 Elemental bio-imaging of melanoma in lymph node biopsies 450–3

  20. Silveira L, Silveira FL, Zângaro RA, Pacheco MT, Bodanese B (2012) Discriminating model for diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma in vitro based on the Raman spectra of selected biochemicals. J Biomed Opt 17:77003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oliveira AF de, Santos ID de AO, Cartaxo SB, Bitar RA, Martinho H da S, Martin AA, Ferreira LM (2010) Differential diagnosis in primary and metastatic cutaneous melanoma by FT-Raman spectroscopy. Acta Cir Bras 25:434–9

  22. Mistry B D 2009 A handbook of spectroscopic data—chemistry (UV, IR, PRM, 13CNMR and Mass Spectroscopy) Jaipur, India

  23. Roggo Y, Duponchel L, Huvenne J-P (2003) Comparison of supervised pattern recognition methods with McNemar’s statistical test: application to qualitative analysis of sugar beet by near-infrared spectroscopy Anal. Chim Acta 477:187–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O’farrell M, Lewis E, Flanagan C, Lyons WB, Jackman N (2005) Combining principal component analysis with an artificial neural network to perform online quality assessment of food as it cooks in a large-scale industrial oven. Sensors Actuators B Chem 107:104–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Notingher I, Jell G, Notingher PL, Bisson I, Tsigkou O, Polak JM, Stevens MM, Hench LL (2005) Multivariate analysis of Raman spectra for in vitro non-invasive studies of living cells. J Mol Struct 744:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu C-M, Fu S-Y (2008) Effective protocols for kNN search on broadcast multi-dimensional index trees Inf. Syst 33:18–35

    Google Scholar 

  27. Luo YF, Guo ZF, Zhu ZY, Wang CP, Jiang HY, Han BY (2005) Studies on ANN models of determination of tea polyphenol and amylose in tea by near-infrared spectroscopy. Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi Guang pu 25:1230–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y and Siew C-K 2004 Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks 2004 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37541) vol 2 (IEEE) pp 985–90

  29. Huang G, Huang G-B, Song S, You K (2015) Trends in extreme learning machines: a review. Neural Netw 61:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Varmuza K and Filzmoser P 2016 Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis in chemometrics (CRC press)

  32. Dingari NC, Barman I, Saha A, McGee S, Galindo LH, Liu W, Plecha D, Klein N, Dasari RR, Fitzmaurice M (2013) Development and comparative assessment of Raman spectroscopic classification algorithms for lesion discrimination in stereotactic breast biopsies with microcalcifications. J Biophotonics 6:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kangas MJ, Wilson CL, Burks RM, Atwater J, Lukowicz RM, Garver B, Mayer M, Havenridge S, Holmes AE (2018) An improved comparison of chemometric analyses for the identification of acids and bases with colorimetric sensor arrays Int. J Chem 10:36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yoshino S, Thornton B, Takahashi T, Takaya Y, Nozaki T (2018) Signal preprocessing of deep-sea laser-induced plasma spectra for identification of pelletized hydrothermal deposits using Artificial Neural Networks Spectrochim. Acta Part B At Spectrosc 145:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Huffman C, Sobral H, Terán-Hinojosa E (2019) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy spectral feature selection to enhance classification capabilities: a t-test filter approach Spectrochim. Acta Part B At Spectrosc 162:105721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hastie T, Tibshirani R and Friedman J 2009 The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction (Springer Science & Business Media)

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61775017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qianqian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

The manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, M.N., Wang, Q., Idrees, B.S. et al. Evaluation of human melanoma and normal formalin paraffin-fixed samples using Raman and LIBS fused data. Lasers Med Sci 37, 2489–2499 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03513-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03513-3

Keywords