Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Where do we go from here? An assessment of navigation performance using a compass versus a GPS unit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Global Positioning System (GPS) looks set to replace the traditional map and compass for navigation tasks in military and civil domains. However, we may ask whether GPS has a real performance advantage over traditional methods. We present an exploratory study using a waypoint-plotting task to compare the standard magnetic compass against a military GPS unit, for both expert and non-expert navigators. Whilst performance times were generally longer in setting up the GPS unit, once navigation was underway the GPS was more efficient than the compass. For medium- to long-term missions, this means that GPS could offer significant performance benefits, although the compass remains superior for shorter missions. Notwithstanding the performance times, significantly more errors, and more serious errors, occurred when using the compass. Overall, then, the GPS offers some clear advantages, especially for non-expert users. Nonetheless, concerns over the development of cognitive maps remain when using GPS technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Antin JF, Dingus TA, Hulse MC, Wierwille WW (1990) An evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of an automobile moving-map navigational display. Int J Man Mach Stud 33(5):581–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur EJ, Hancock PA (2001) Navigation training in virtual environments. Int J Cogn Ergon 5(4):387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge L (1983) Ironies of automation. Automatica 19:775–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer ER, Hirase S (2000) Individual differences in development and applicability of navigational knowledge. Ergonomics for the New Millennium. In: Proceedings of the XIVth triennial congress of the international ergonomics association and 44th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society, vol 3. San Diego, California, USA, 29 July–4 August 2000. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp 137–140

  • Chen JL, Stanney KM (1999) A theoretical model of wayfinding in virtual environments: proposed strategies for navigational aiding. Presence 8(6):671–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo P, Warren WH, Duchon A, Tarr MJ (2005) Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31(2):195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero L (2004) Where am I? Let your GPS receiver show you the way. Hispanic (November 2004):44

  • Leggatt AP, Noyes JM (2000) Navigation aids: effects on crew workload and performance. Mil Psychol 12(2):89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle RA (2001) Navigation: am I really lost or virtually there? In: Harris D (ed) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, vol 6. Industrial Ergonomics, HCI, and Applied Cognitive Psychology. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 135–142

  • St. George R, Nendick M (1997) GPS = ‘got position sussed’: some challenges for engineering and cognitive psychology in the general aviation environment. In: Harris D (ed) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, vol 1. Transportation Systems. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 81–91

  • Stanton NA, Walker GH, Green D, Gulliver S, Jenkins D, Young MS, Watts S, Baber C, Cross J, Houghton R, McMaster R, Gibson H (2005) A reconfigurable C4 testbed for experimental studies into network enabled capability. In: Proceedings of the IEE and MoD HFI DTC symposium on people and systems: who are we designing for? London, 16–17 November 2005. IEE, London, pp 135–143

  • Wesler MM, Marshak WP, Glumm MM (1998) Innovative measures of accuracy and situational awareness during land navigation. Human-system interaction: the sky’s no limit. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 42nd annual meeting, vol 2. Chicago, Illinois, 5–9 October 1998. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp 1366–1370

  • Williams KW (1999) Navigation display design: displaying nearest airport information. Int J Aviat Psychol 9(1):91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H. et al. Where do we go from here? An assessment of navigation performance using a compass versus a GPS unit. Cogn Tech Work 10, 231–236 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0095-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0095-7

Keywords