Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A proposal for a new accident analysis method and its application to a catastrophic railway accident in Japan

  • Original article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a society of highly advanced technology, a new type of compound accident takes place. In an accident analysis, recent research concerns three aspects: human (M), technology (T) and organisation (O). However, technologies are developing day by day and it is becoming difficult to find causes of the recent compound accidents even with M, T and O analyses. This paper suggests further analyses considering the recent change of Western and Japanese societies quoting the recent catastrophic railway accident in Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Toshiba and NEC gave up marketing High Dense DVD since the leading US cinema company, the Warner Brothers decided to employ Blue Lay Disc as a video media for next generation in February 2008.

References

  • Bainbridge L (1987) Irony of automation. In: Rasumussen J, Dunkan K, Leplat J (eds) New technology and human error. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciabue P (2005) Human error risk management technology for safety audit of a large railway organisations. Appl Ergon 36:709–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caird JK, Creaser JI, Edwards CJ, Dewar RE (2002) A human factors analysis of highway-railway grade crossing accidents in Canada. Transport Canada Publication, TP 13938E

  • Chaali-Djelassi A, Vanderhaegen F, Cacciabue P, Cassani M (2007) Barrier removal prediction based on a new approach. Application to a degraded train speed procedure. In: 26th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, Copenhagen

  • Chang Z, Polet P, Vanderhaegen F (2002) Toward a decision making support of barrier removal. In: 21st European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Control (EAM2002), Glasgow

  • Edwards E (1988) Introductory overview. In: Wiener EL, Nagel DC (eds) Human factors in aviation. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gofuku A, Ohi T, Ito K, Niwa Y (2004) Dynamic operation permission system based on operation procedure as a co-operator. Trans Hum Interface Soc 6(1):29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y (1994) The bloom generation will destroy Japan (in Japanese). Waseda Publishing, Tokyo

  • Hall JL (2003) Columbia and challenger: organizational failure at NASA. Space Policy 19:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi T (1986) Technology and society: Japanese experience, vol 4. Case study, traffic. Development in technology road, railway, and marine transportation of industrial engineering,United Nations University

  • Hollnagel E (1998) Cognitive reliability and error analysis method. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2004) Barrier analysis and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2006a) “CREAM Accident Analysis” phenotypes and genotypes, In Preprint of advanced risk management course lectures for Yokohama National University

  • Hollnagel E (2006b) Resilience engineering and safety management. In: Handout of the Open Seminar in Yokohama National University, ETTO literature to be published

  • Ikeda K (1983) Gouldner’s theory of the new class and culture of critical discourse (in Japanese). Hyogo Univ Teach Educ J 2:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Learned Club (2005) Thorough comparison. Kanto people and Kansai people (in Japanese). PHP pocket edition “from the character to the favor of food, clothing, and housing”

  • Japanese Industrial Standard, Japanese Standard Association (1995) JIS E 6005 Railway rolling stock, automatic train control and automatic train stop devise on board, test method

  • Jo S (2006) Why does the young person resign in three years from a company? The future of Japan seniority order destroys (in Japanese). Ko-bunsha publishing, Tokyo

  • JR Fukuchiyama line derailment tune final report (2007) The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport RA-2007-3-1

  • Kato N (1999) No thought of Japan (in Japanese). Heibonsha Publishing New Book, Tokyo

  • Kawakida J (1967) Conception-For the creativity development (in Japanese). Chuko publishing New Book

  • Kawano R (1999) Human error reduction technique: approach by error proof (In Japanese). J Jpn Plant Hum Factors Soc 4:121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenko Y (1330) Tsurezure-gusa (Essays in pastime) (In ancient Japanese). Episode No. 140, 142, 165

  • Le Bot P (2004) Human reliability data, human error and accident models-illustration through the Three Mile Island accident analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83(2):153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainichi Shimbun Science Environment Division (2006) The science course white paper (in Japanese). Kodansha Publishing, Tokyo

  • Masayoshi S, Miyaji Y (2004) Human factors analysis by Railway Technical Institute (in Japanese). In: Proceedings of Reliability Engineering Association of Japan, No.12

  • McCormick J (1986) Reliability and risk analysis, reliability. IEEE Trans 35(3):300–303

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Land (2006) Infrastructure and transport airlines and railway accident panel. Drought of report concerning factual survey (in Japanese). Drought report

  • Miyamoto M (2002) Safety in Railway—beginning of a book occasional thoughts, Nihon Sharyo Association of Mechanical Technology (in Japanese). R&M 9(2):2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima M (2005) Examination of fact and trial example of “Nikkin-Kyoiku” (in Japanese), Labor laws law ten-day report 1613

  • Okumura R (2006) Idea of cohabitation in aging society (in Japanese). Research note of Mitsubishi Research Institute, No. 45:142–154

  • PHP Institute learned club (2001), Japanese data match 100th “Kanto” and “Kansai” interest of the confrontation (in Japanese)

  • Polet P, Vanderhaegen F, Wieringa P (2002) Theory of safety related violation of system barriers. Cogn Technol Work 4(3):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryo H, Moteki K (2007) Ethics of Japanese spirit and capitalism (in Japanese). Gento-sha publishing New book, Tokyo

  • Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accident.Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaiya T (1980) “Nodule”—the bloom generation (in Japanese). Bungei-shunju Publishing, Tokyo

  • Sheridan T (1992) Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Shimura K (1992) Experiential-culture theory of Japan–U.S. friction. Maruzen Publishing, Tokyo

  • Swain A, Guttman H (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278

  • Takahashi S (2006) Slow carrier (in Japanese). PHP Institute, Tokyo

  • Takase T, Hagio C, Hirota T, Oh-nishi M, Yosano Y, Hayashi N, Iwahashi K, Ito S, Morita M (2007) Social change and Kansai activation (in Japanese), Institute of Economic and Political Studies, Kansai University Research library No. 144

  • Ueno S (2007) The background of the cause of the JR Fukuchiyama line accident: From the aspect of the human factors (in Japanese). In Web Research Report of Mitsubishi Research Institute. http://safety.mri.co.jp/ssu_hp/ssu/report/02_04.html (Uploaded in 2005)

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1999) NUREG-1624, Revision 1, Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA)

  • Wakabayashi K (1999) Key management and management consulting trends in the US, Journal of Mitsubishi Research Institute No.34

  • Wilson J, Norris B (2005a) Editorial: CTW special issue on rail human factors. Cogn Technol Work 8(2):2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Norris B (2005b) Rail human factors. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada M (1992) Voluntary difference society (in Japanese)

  • Yamaguchi M (2001) Rail (in Japanese), No 43. Eriei Publishing, Tokyo

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Risk Management and Safety Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-5, Tokiwa-dai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama, 240-8501, Japan

    Yuji Niwa

Authors
  1. Yuji Niwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Niwa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niwa, Y. A proposal for a new accident analysis method and its application to a catastrophic railway accident in Japan. Cogn Tech Work 11, 187–204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0112-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0112-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation