Abstract
This study seeks to theorize on and examine the roles of information technology (IT) use for work combined with individual-level culture dimensions, namely power distance and masculinity, in technostress formation. The model is tested with structural equation modeling techniques applied to data collected from 485 employees in China. Results suggest that (1) the extent of IT use for work drives technostress, (2) technostress is further augmented in employees who are high in power distance and masculinity, (3) the effect of IT use on technostress is amplified for employees who are high in power distance and masculinity, and (4) the effect of IT use for work on technostress is influential primarily for employees with above average power distance and masculinity culture values.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aranda MP, Knight BG (1997) The influence of ethnicity and culture on the caregiver stress and coping process: a sociocultural review and analysis. Gerontologist 37(3):342–354 (<Go to ISI> ://WOS:A1997XF36400006)
Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011). Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quart 5(4):831–858 (<Go to ISI>://WOS:000297236000003)
Bardi A, Schwartz SH (2003) Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29(10):1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602
Bearden WO, Money RB, Nevins JL (2006) Multidimensional versus unidimensional measures in assessing national culture values: the Hofstede VSM 94 example. J Bus Res 59(2):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.008
Bliese PD, Britt TW (2001) Social support, group consensus and stressor–strain relationships: social context matters. J Org Behav 22(4):425–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.95
Boswell WR, Olson-Buchanan JB, LePine MA (2004) Relations between stress and work outcomes: the role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain (article). J Vocat Behav 64(1):165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00049-6
Brod C (1984) Techno stress: the human cost of the computer revolution. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Carver CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, Noriega V, Scheier MF, Robinson DS et al (1993) How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress—a study of women with early-stage breast-cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 65(2), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.375
Chun CA, Moos RH, Cronkite RC (2006). Culture: a fundamental context for the stress and coping paradigm. In: Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping, pp 29–53 (<Go to ISI>://CCC:000237339100003)
D’Arcy J, Gupta A, Tarafdar M, Turel O (2014) Reflecting on the “Dark Side” of information technology use. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 35(1):109–118
de Mooij M, Hofstede G (2011) Cross-cultural consumer behavior: a review of research findings. J Int Consum Mark 23(3–4):181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.578057
Den Hartog DN, House RJ, Hanges PJ, Ruiz-Quintanilla SA (1999) Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadersh Quart 10(2):219–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00018-1
Dorfman PW, Howell JP, Hibino S, Lee JK, Tate U, Bautista A (1997) Leadership in Western and Asian countries: commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. Leadersh Quart 8(3):233–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(97)90003-5
Dustbar S, Hofstede GJ (1999) Videoconferencing across cultures: a conceptual framework for floor control issues. J Inf Technol 14(1):161–169
Gaudioso F, Turel O, Galimberti C (2017) The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes. Comput Hum Behav 69:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.041
Gefen D, Straub DW (1997) Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quart 21(4):389. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=23840920&Fmt=7&clientId=29636&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Ho KKW, Yoo B, Yu S, Tam KY (2007) The effect of culture and product categories on the level of use of buy-it-now (BIN) auctions by sellers. J Glob Inf Manag 15(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2007100101
Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills
Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Hofstede G, Bond MH (1988) The Confucius connection—from cultural roots to economic-growth. Org Dyn 16(4):5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
Hofstede G, McCrae RR (2004) Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross Cult Res 38(1):52–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443
Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York
House R, Javidan M, Hanges P, Dorfman P (2002) Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. J World Bus 37(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-9516(01)00069-4
Javidan M, House RJ, Dorfman PW, Hanges PJ, de Luque MS (2006) Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):897–914. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400234
Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Quart 24(2):285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL et al (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32(6):959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006074
Lazarus RS (1993) Coping theory and research—past, present, and future. Psychosom Med 55(3):234–247 (<Go to ISI> ://WOS:A1993LE08300002)
Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York
Lindblom J, Thorvald P (2017) Manufacturing in the wild—viewing human-based assembly through the lens of distributed cognition. Prod Manuf Res Open Access J 5(1):57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1322540
Lu C, Wang B, Siu O, Lu L, Du D (2015) Work-home interference and work values in Greater China. J Manag Psychol 30(7):801–814. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-05-2012-0161
Lu C, Lu JJ, Du D, Brough P (2016) Crossover effects of work-family conflict among Chinese couples. J Manag Psychol 31(1):235–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-09-2012-0283
Lu J, Shi M, Wang W et al (2017) Factors influencing Chinese university students’ willingness to performing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (article). Int Emerg Nurs 32:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2016.04.001
Maier C, Laumer S, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2015) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: a study of Facebook use. Inf Syst J 25(3):275–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12068
Martinsons MG, Hempel PS (1998) Chinese business process re-engineering. Int J Inf Manag 18(6):393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-4012(98)00031-0
McGrath JE (1976) Stress and behavior in organizations. In: Dunnette MD (ed) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 1351–1395
Peterson M, Wilson JF (2002). The culture-work-health model and work stress. Am J Health Behav 26(1):16–24 (<Go to ISI>://WOS:000172656900002)
Poropat A, Arnold K, Ashton N, Brennan A, Skuse B (2016) A comparison of personality factors emerging within different English-speaking cultures. Pers Individ Differ 101:506–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.261
Ragu-Nathan TS, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, Tu Q (2008) The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf Syst Res 19(4):417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
Reese E, Myftari E, McAnally HM, Chen Y, Neha T, Wang Q et al (2017) Telling the tale and living well: adolescent narrative identity, personality traits, and well-being across cultures (article). Child Dev 88(2):612–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12618
Richard OC Barnett T, Dwyer S, Chadwick K (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Acad Manag J 47(2):255–266 (<Go to ISI>://WOS:000221772600006)
Ros M, Schwartz SH, Surkiss S (1999) Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Appl Psychol Int Rev 48(1):49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00048.x
Scherer KR (1997) The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. J Pers Soc Psychol 73(5):902–922 (<Go to ISI> ://A1997YD81800002)
Schwartz SH (1999) A theory of cultural values and some implications for work (article). Appl Psychol Int Rev 48(1):23–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
Scott MJ, Guntuku SC, Lin W, Ghinea G (2016) Do personality and culture influence perceived video quality and enjoyment? IEEE Trans Multimed 18(9):1796–1807. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2016.2574623
Sellberg C, Susi T (2014) Technostress in the office: a distributed cognition perspective on human–technology interaction. Cognit Technol Work 16(2):187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-013-0256-9
Soper DS, Turel O (2016) Theory in North American information systems research: a culturomic analysis. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 38:477–500
Spector PE, Cooper CL, Sparks K, Sanchez JI, Bussing W et al (2001) An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede values survey module 1994: a comparison of individual and country/province level results. Appl Psychol Int Rev 50(2):269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00058
Spencer-Rodgers J, Williams MJ, Hamilton DL, Peng K, Wang L (2007) Culture and group perception: dispositional and stereotypic inferences about novel and national groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 93(4):525–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.525
Srivastava SC (2015) Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Inf Syst J 25(4):355–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12067
Tang CSK, Au WT, Schwarzer R, Schmitz G (2001) Mental health outcomes of job stress among Chinese teachers: role of stress resource factors and burnout. J Org Behav 22(8):887–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.120
Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan BS, Ragu-Nathan TS (2007) The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity (article). J Manag Inf Syst 24(1):301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222240109
Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan TS, Ragu-Nathan BS (2011) Crossing to the dark side: examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress (article). Commun ACM, 54(9):113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1995376.1995403
Tarafdar M, Pullins E, Ragu-Nathan TS (2014) Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson’s behavioural performance. J Pers Sell Sales Manag 34(1):51–69
Tarafdar M, D’Arcy J, Turel O, Gupta A (2015a) The dark side of information technology. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 56(2):600–623
Tarafdar M, Pullins EB, Ragu-Nathan TS (2015b) Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Inf Syst J 25(2):103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
Taras V, Kirkman BL, Steel P (2010) Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. J Appl Psychol 95(3):405–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018938
Triandis HC (1993) Cultures and organizations—software of the mind—Hofstede, G. Adm Sci Q 38(1):132–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393257
Triandis HC (2004) The many dimensions of culture—academic commentary. Acad Manag Exec 18(1):88–93 (<Go to ISI>://WOS:000220265400011)
Turel O (2015) Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: a theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users. Eur J Inf Syst 24(4):431–446. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.19
Turel O (2016) Untangling the complex role of guilt in rational decisions to discontinue the use of a hedonic Information System. Eur J Inf Syst 25(5):432–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-016-0002-5
Turel O (2017) Organizational deviance via social networking site use: the roles of inhibition, stress and sex differences. Personal Individ Differ 119(1):311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.002
Turel O, Bechara A (2016) A triadic reflective-impulsive-interoceptive awareness model of general and impulsive information system use: behavioral tests of neuro-cognitive theory. Front Psychol 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00601
Turel O, Bechara A (2017) Effects of motor impulsivity and sleep quality on swearing, interpersonally deviant and disadvantageous behaviors on online social networking sites. Personal Individ Differ 108(1):91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.005
Turel O, Gaudioso F (2018) Techno-stressors, distress and strain: the roles of leadership and competitive climates. Cognit Technol Work 20(2):309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0461-7
Turel O, Qahri-Saremi H (2016) Problematic use of social networking sites: antecedents and consequence from a dual system theory perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 33(4):1087–1116
Turel O, Serenko A (2010) Is mobile email addiction overlooked? Commun ACM 53(5):41–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1735223.1735237
Turel O, Serenko A (2012) The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites. Eur J Inf Syst 21(5):512–528. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.1
Turel O, Serenko A, Bontis N (2011a) Family and work-related consequences of addiction to organizational pervasive technologies. Inf Manag 48(2–3):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.01.004
Turel O, Serenko A, Giles P (2011b) Integrating technology addiction and use: an empirical investigation of online auction sites. MIS Q 35(4):1043–1061
Turel O, Poppa NT, Gil-Or O (2018) Neuroticism magnifies the detrimental association between social media addiction symptoms and wellbeing in women, but not in men: a three-way moderation model. Psychiatr Q. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-018-9563-x
Tweed RG, White K, Lehman (2004) Culture, stress, and coping–internally- and externally-targeted control strategies of European Canadians, east Asian Canadians, and Japanese. J Cross Cult Psychol 35(6):652–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104270109
Van der Doef M, Maes S (1999) The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 13(2):87–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783799296084
Wang K, Shu Q, Tu Q (2008) Technostress under different organizational environments: an empirical investigation. Comput Hum Behav 24(6):3002–30013
Yoo B, Donthu N (2002) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd edition. J Mark Res 39(3):388–389 (<Go to ISI>://WOS:000177578400010)
Yoo B, Donthu N, Lenartowicz T (2011) Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: development and validation of CVSCALE (article in journal). J Int Consum Mark 23(3/4):(5/9)):193–210
Zhong BL, Liu TB, Huang JX, Fung HH, Chan SSC, Conwell Y et al (2016) Acculturative stress of Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers: a qualitative study. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157530
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate financial support from Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 12YJA630089), Guangzhou philosophy and social science development 13th five-year plan project (No. 2016GZYB49) and China Scholarship Council (No. 201308440307) for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Y., Turel, O. Information technology use for work and technostress: effects of power distance and masculinity culture dimensions. Cogn Tech Work 21, 145–157 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0503-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0503-1