Abstract
Skills in NINO3.4 sea surface temperature (SST) prediction provide a benchmark for evaluation of the current generation of machine learning models. Several empirical data-driven models rely on capturing low-frequency variability of the SST anomalies over the east and west Pacific as a dominant predictor. The physical processes contributing to the SST anomalies in the east and west Pacific are different. The study discusses the relative contribution of SST anomalies over the western and eastern Pacific to the prediction skill of NINO3.4 SST using a convolutional neural network (CNN)–based prediction model. CNN models employ spatial filters and are highly efficient in capturing the anomaly edges or gradients. The study reports three CNN-based model experiments. The first is a CTRL experiment using the whole equatorial Pacific domain SST as input. The second and third models use the equatorial eastern and western Pacific domain SST only. A novel feature of this study is that we have generated a large number of ensemble members (5000) through random initialization of CNN filters. It is found that random initialization affects the forecast skill, and the skill of model ensembles at each lead time shows a Gaussian distribution. The analysis suggests that the west Pacific SST model provides better NINO3.4 skills as compared to the east Pacific models. The model forecast skills also show monthly variability with low skill during April–May, indicative of the spring predictability barrier. Ensembles with good skill show relatively better east-west gradients than ensembles with bad skill.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The primary skin temperature, ERSST V5, and COBE SST data used here are freely available as mentioned in the text. Any derived data/code will be made available upon a reasonable request.
References
Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA et al (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 112. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798
Ballester J, Bordoni S, Petrova D, Rodó X (2016) Heat advection processes leading to El Niño events as depicted by an ensemble of ocean assimilation products. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 121:3710–3729. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011718
Barbosa SM, Andersen OB (2009) Trend patterns in global sea surface temperature. Int J Climatol 29:2049–2055. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1855
Barnston AG, Tippett MK, L’Heureux ML et al (2012) Skill of real-time seasonal ENSO model predictions during 2002–11: is our capability increasing? Bull Amer Meteor Soc 93:631–651. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00111.1
Barnston AG, Tippett MK, Ranganathan M, L’Heureux ML (2019) Deterministic skill of ENSO predictions from the north American multimodel ensemble. Clim Dyn 53:7215–7234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3603-3
Chen Y, Huang X, Luo J-J et al (2023) Prediction of ENSO using multivariable deep learning. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters 16:100350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2023.100350
Guo Y, Cao X, Liu B, Peng K (2020) El Niño index prediction using deep learning with ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Symmetry 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060893
Ham Y-G, Kim J-H, Luo J-J (2019) Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts. Nature 573:568–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1559-7
Hirahara S, Ishii M, Fukuda Y (2013) Centennial-Scale Sea surface temperature analysis and its uncertainty. J Clim 27:57–75. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00837.1
Huang B, Thorne PW, Banzon VF et al (2017) Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5): upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J Clim 30:8179–8205. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1
Jadhav J, Panickal S, Marathe S, Ashok K (2015) On the possible cause of distinct El Niño types in the recent decades. Sci Rep 5:17009. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17009
Jie W, Wu T, Vitart F et al (2023) How to choose credible ensemble members for the sub-seasonal to seasonal prediction of precipitation? Clim Dyn 61:1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06623-4
Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–472. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2
Kug J-S, Jin F-F, An S-I (2009) Two types of El Niño events: cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J Clim 22:1499–1515. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2624.1
L’Heureux ML, Collins DC, Hu Z-Z (2013) Linear trends in sea surface temperature of the tropical Pacific Ocean and implications for the El Niño-southern oscillation. Clim Dyn 40:1223–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1331-2
Lee S, L’Heureux M, Wittenberg AT et al (2022) On the future zonal contrasts of equatorial Pacific climate: perspectives from observations, simulations, and theories. Npj climate and atmospheric. Science 5:82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00301-2
Liang XS, Xu F, Rong Y et al (2021) El Niño Modoki can be mostly predicted more than 10 years ahead of time. Sci Rep 11:17860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97111-y
Lindzen RS, Nigam S (1987) On the role of sea surface temperature gradients in forcing low-level winds and convergence in the tropics. J Atmos Sci 44:2418–2436. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<2418:OTROSS>2.0.CO;2
Marathe S, Ashok K, Swapna P, Sabin TP (2015) Revisiting El Niño Modokis. Clim Dyn 45:3527–3545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2555-8
Mu B, Qin B, Yuan S (2021) ENSO-ASC 1.0.0: ENSO deep learning forecast model with a multivariate air–sea coupler. Geosci Model Dev 14:6977–6999. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6977-2021
Mukhin D, Gavrilov A, Seleznev A, Buyanova M (2021) An atmospheric signal lowering the spring predictability barrier in statistical ENSO forecasts. Geophys Res Lett 48:e2020GL091287. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091287
Orrell D, Smith L, Barkmeijer J, Palmer TN (2001) Model error in weather forecasting. Nonlin Processes Geophys 8:357–371. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-8-357-2001
Park C, Kang SM, Stuecker MF, Jin F-F (2022) Distinct surface warming response over the western and eastern equatorial pacific to radiative forcing. Geophys Res Lett 49:e2021GL095829. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095829
Picaut J, Masia F, du Penhoat Y (1997) An advective-reflective conceptual model for the oscillatory nature of the ENSO. Science 277:663–666. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5326.663
Sahoo M, Yadav RK (2021) Role of equatorial Central Pacific Sea surface temperature in modulating rainfall over North India during Indian summer monsoon. Int J Climatol 41:6017–6030. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7165
Saravanan R, McWilliams JC (1998) Advective Ocean–atmosphere interaction: an analytical stochastic model with implications for decadal variability. J Clim 11:165–188. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0165:AOAIAA>2.0.CO;2
Sharmila S, Hendon H, Alves O et al (2023) Contrasting El Niño–La Niña predictability and prediction skill in 2-year reforecasts of the twentieth century. J Clim 36:1269–1285. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0028.1
Shin N-Y, Ham Y-G, Kim J-H et al (2022) Application of deep learning to understanding ENSO dynamics. Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-21-0011.1
Suarez MJ, Schopf PS (1988) A delayed action oscillator for ENSO. J Atmos Sci 45:3283–3287. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<3283:ADAOFE>2.0.CO;2
Torrence C, Webster PJ (1998) The annual cycle of persistence in the El Nño/southern oscillation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124:1985–2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712455010
Valsala VK, Roxy MK, Ashok K, Murtugudde R (2014) Spatiotemporal characteristics of seasonal to multidecadal variability of pCO2 and air-sea CO2 fluxes in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 119:8987–9012. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010212
Wang Y, Counillon F, Keenlyside N et al (2019) Seasonal predictions initialised by assimilating sea surface temperature observations with the EnKF. Clim Dyn 53:5777–5797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04897-9
Wang-Chun Lai A, Herzog M, Graf H-F (2018) ENSO forecasts near the spring predictability barrier and possible reasons for the recently reduced predictability. J Clim 31:815–838. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0180.1
Weisberg RH, Wang C (1997) A western pacific oscillator paradigm for the El Niño-southern oscillation. Geophys Res Lett 24:779–782. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL00689
Wen C, Kumar A, L’Heureux M et al (2021) The importance of Central Pacific meridional heat advection to the developmenT of ENSO. J Clim 34:5753–5774. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0648.1
Xiang B, Wang B, Li T (2013) A new paradigm for the predominance of standing Central Pacific warming after the late 1990s. Clim Dyn 41:327–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1427-8
Xu S, Dai D, Cui X et al (2023) A deep learning approach to predict sea surface temperature based on multiple modes. Ocean Model 181:102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2022.102158
Xue Y, Cane MA, Zebiak SE, Blumenthal MB (1994) On the prediction of ENSO: a study with a low-order Markov model. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography 46:512–528. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v46i4.15641
Yang S, Jiang X (2014) Prediction of eastern and Central Pacific ENSO events and their impacts on east Asian climate by the NCEP climate forecast system. J Clim 27:4451–4472. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00471.1
Yeager SG, Rosenbloom N, Glanville AA et al (2022) The seasonal-to-multiyear large ensemble (SMYLE) prediction system using the community earth system model version 2. Geosci Model Dev 15:6451–6493. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022
Yu J-Y, Kao H-Y, Lee T (2010) Subtropics-related interannual sea surface temperature variability in the central equatorial Pacific. J Clim 23:2869–2884. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3171.1
Zebiak SE, Cane MA (1987) A model El Niño–southern oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 115:2262–2278. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<2262:AMENO>2.0.CO;2
Zhang GJ, Ramanathan V, McPhaden MJ (1995) Convection-evaporation feedback in the equatorial Pacific. J Clim 8:3040–3051. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<3040:CEFITE>2.0.CO;2
Zheng F, Zhu J (2010) Spring predictability barrier of ENSO events from the perspective of an ensemble prediction system. Glob Planet Chang 72:108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.01.021
Acknowledgements
LS acknowledges the research fellowship support from the MRFP Project, Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Govt of India. Research support from Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM), an autonomous institute under MoES, and India Meteorological Department (IMD) is acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge the anonymous reviewers and the editor for the constructive comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Oliver Fringer
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 1731 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lekshmi, S., Chattopadhyay, R., Pai, D.S. et al. On the relative role of east and west pacific sea surface temperature (SST) gradients in the prediction skill of Central Pacific NINO3.4 SST. Ocean Dynamics 73, 773–791 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-023-01581-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-023-01581-9