Abstract
The European Union is one of the most prosperous areas of the world. However, huge disparities remain among its member states and regions. Given the persistence of those large regional inequalities, it is pertinent to analyse the efficiency of structural funds. In light of the neoclassical theory, these funds should contribute to improving the economic efficiency among the poorest regions, promoting regional convergence. However, the new economic geography states that structural funds may also facilitate the geographic concentration of economic activities, thus perpetuating regional imbalances. This article measures the impact of structural funds on regional convergence using a spatial econometric approach applied to an extended sample of European regions across a long time interval. Based on data for 96 EU regions during the period 1995–2009, a Durbin model with panel data is estimated in order to capture the effects of spatial dependence in both the lagged dependent variable and the independent variables. The results confirm the existence of conditional convergence and the importance of neighbourhood and spillover effects but do not detect the existence of positive impacts from structural funds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial econometrics: methods and models, Volume 4, Springer, Science+Business Media.
Anselin, L. (1995), Local indicators of spatial association — LISA, Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.
Anselin, L., I. Syabri and Y. Kho (2006), GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis, Geographical Analysis, 38(1), 5–22.
Billmeier, A. and T. Nannicini (2007), Trade openness and growth: pursuing empirical glasnost, International Monetary Fund.
Dall’erba, S. (2005), Productivity convergence and spatial dependence among Spanish regions, Journal of Geographical Systems, 7(2), 207–227.
Dall’erba, S. and J. Le Gallo (2008), Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989–1999: A spatial econometric analysis, Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), 219–244.
Dijkstra, L. and Z. Gakova (2008), Labour mobility between the regions of the EU-27 and a comparison with the USA, European Commission, Regional focus, 02/2008.
Elhorst, J. P. (2003), Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models, International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 244–268.
Elhorst, J. P. (2014), Spatial econometrics, Springer.
Fingleton, B. and E. López-Bazo (2006), Empirical growth models with spatial effects, Papers in Regional Science, 85(2), 177–198.
Florax, R. J. G. M. and P. Nijkamp (2003), Misspecification in linear spatial regression models, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
Hooghe, L. (1996), Cohesion policy and European integration: building multi-level governance, Oxford University Press.
Islam, N. (1998), Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach: A Reply, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 325–329.
Islam, N. (2003), What have we learnt from the convergence debate?, Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 309–362.
Le Gallo, J. (2002), Econométrie spatiale: l’autocorrélation spatiale dans les modèles de régression linéaire, Economie & Prévision, (4), 139–157.
Le Gallo, J., C. Ertur and C. Baumont (2003), A spatial econometric analysis of convergence across European regions, 1980–1995, in European regional growth, 99–129, Springer.
LeSage, J. P. (2008), An introduction to spatial econometrics, Revue d’économie Industrielle, (3), 19–44.
LeSage, J. and R. K. Pace (2008), Introduction to spatial econometrics, CRC press.
Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer and D. N. Weil (1992), A contribution to the empirics of economic growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
Marzinotto, B. (2012), The growth effects of EU cohesion policy: a metaanalysis, Bruegel Working Paper, 2012/14.
Mohl, P. and T. Hagen (2010), Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 353–365.
Moran, P. A. P. (1950), Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, 37(1–2), 17–23.
Nerlove, M. (1997), Properties of alternative estimators of dynamic panel models: an empirical analysis of cross-country data for the study of economic growth, University of Maryland Working Paper Series, 197852.
Quah, D. T. (1996), Empirics for economic growth and convergence, European Economic Review, 40(6), 1353–1375.
Temple, J. (1999), The new growth evidence, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 112–156.
Vesmas, D. M. (2009), Fundamental Marks on the Regional Policy of the European Union, Acta Universitatis Lucian Blaga, 181.
Vickerman, R., K. Spiekermann and M. Wegener (1999), Accessibility and economic development in Europe, Regional Studies, 33(1), 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Micaela Antunes, Centre for Business and Economics Research, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel Viegas, GOVCOPP, University of Aveiro, Portugal.
Celeste Varum, GOVCOPP, University of Aveiro, Portugal.
Carlos Pinho, GOVCOPP, University of Aveiro, Portugal.
Rights and permissions
Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Open Access funding provided by ZBW — Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
About this article
Cite this article
Antunes, M., Viegas, M., Varum, C. et al. The Impact of Structural Funds on Regional Growth: A Panel Data Spatial Analysis. Intereconomics 55, 312–319 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0921-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0921-1