Abstract
The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial enrolled ~155,000 participants to determine whether certain screening exams reduced mortality from prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer. Repurposing the data provides an unparalleled resource for matching patients with the outcomes of demographically or diagnostically comparable patients. A web-based application was developed to query this subset of patient information against a given patient’s demographics and risk factors. Analysis of the matched data yields outcome information which can then be used to guide management decisions and imaging software. Prognostic information is also estimated via the proportion of matched patients that progress to cancer. The US Preventative Services Task Force provides screening recommendations for cancers of the breast, colorectal tract, and lungs. There is wide variability in adherence of clinicians to these guidelines and others published by the Fleischner Society and various cancer organizations. Data mining the PLCO dataset for clinical decision support can optimize the use of limited healthcare resources, focusing screening on patients for whom the benefit to risk ratio is the greatest and most efficacious. A data driven, personalized approach to cancer screening maximizes the economic and clinical efficacy and enables early identification of patients in which the course of disease can be improved. Our dynamic decision support system utilizes a subset of the PLCO dataset as a reference model to determine imaging and testing appropriateness while offering prognostic information for various cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edwards BK, Noone AM, Mariottoa AB, et al: Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 120(9):1290–1314, 2014
Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD: Deaths: final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Report 61:4,2013
Suzuki A, Ishida T, Ohuchi N: Controversies in breast cancer screening for women aged 40–49 years. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2014. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyu054. online only
Barry M: Screening for prostate cancer – the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med 360:1351–1354, 2009
Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG: Korea’s Thyroid-Cancer “Epidemic” – Screening and Overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 371:1765–1767, 2014
MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, et al: Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400, 2005
U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (various years). Recommendations for adults. Retrieved from http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/adultrec.htm
Naidich DP, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Pistolesi M, Goo JM, et al: Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 266(1):304–317, 2013
Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, Benacerraf B, Benson CB, Brewster WR, et al: Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US. Radiology 256(3):943–954, 2010
Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS: The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials 32(6):251S–272S, 2000
Morrison JJ, Hostetter J, Wang K, et al: Data-driven decision support for radiologists: re-using the national lung screening trial dataset for pulmonary nodule management. J Digit Imaging 28(1):18–23, 2014
Lacson R, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP, Gill R, Lenoci-Edwards J, Roy C, et al: Factors associated with radiologists’ adherence to Fleischner Society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radiol 9(7):468–473, 2012
Eisenberg RL: Ways to improve radiologists’ adherence to fleischner society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radiol 10(6):439–441, 2013
Frankovich JF, Longhurst CA, Sutherland SM: Evidence-based medicine in the EMR era. N Engl J Med 365(19):1758–1759, 2011
Kim W, Piraino D: Big data in healthcare: myth, hype, and hope – a point/counterpoint. Town hall meeting conducted at the meeting of the Society of Imaging Informatics in Medicine. National Harbor, MD, 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, A., Hostetter, J., Morrison, J. et al. Focused Decision Support: a Data Mining Tool to Query the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Dataset and Guide Screening Management for the Individual Patient. J Digit Imaging 29, 160–164 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9826-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9826-0