Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Focused Decision Support: a Data Mining Tool to Query the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Dataset and Guide Screening Management for the Individual Patient

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial enrolled ~155,000 participants to determine whether certain screening exams reduced mortality from prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer. Repurposing the data provides an unparalleled resource for matching patients with the outcomes of demographically or diagnostically comparable patients. A web-based application was developed to query this subset of patient information against a given patient’s demographics and risk factors. Analysis of the matched data yields outcome information which can then be used to guide management decisions and imaging software. Prognostic information is also estimated via the proportion of matched patients that progress to cancer. The US Preventative Services Task Force provides screening recommendations for cancers of the breast, colorectal tract, and lungs. There is wide variability in adherence of clinicians to these guidelines and others published by the Fleischner Society and various cancer organizations. Data mining the PLCO dataset for clinical decision support can optimize the use of limited healthcare resources, focusing screening on patients for whom the benefit to risk ratio is the greatest and most efficacious. A data driven, personalized approach to cancer screening maximizes the economic and clinical efficacy and enables early identification of patients in which the course of disease can be improved. Our dynamic decision support system utilizes a subset of the PLCO dataset as a reference model to determine imaging and testing appropriateness while offering prognostic information for various cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edwards BK, Noone AM, Mariottoa AB, et al: Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 120(9):1290–1314, 2014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD: Deaths: final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Report 61:4,2013

  3. Suzuki A, Ishida T, Ohuchi N: Controversies in breast cancer screening for women aged 40–49 years. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2014. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyu054. online only

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Barry M: Screening for prostate cancer – the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med 360:1351–1354, 2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG: Korea’s Thyroid-Cancer “Epidemic” – Screening and Overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 371:1765–1767, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, et al: Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (various years). Recommendations for adults. Retrieved from http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/adultrec.htm

  8. Naidich DP, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Pistolesi M, Goo JM, et al: Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 266(1):304–317, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, Benacerraf B, Benson CB, Brewster WR, et al: Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US. Radiology 256(3):943–954, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS: The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials 32(6):251S–272S, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morrison JJ, Hostetter J, Wang K, et al: Data-driven decision support for radiologists: re-using the national lung screening trial dataset for pulmonary nodule management. J Digit Imaging 28(1):18–23, 2014

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacson R, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP, Gill R, Lenoci-Edwards J, Roy C, et al: Factors associated with radiologists’ adherence to Fleischner Society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radiol 9(7):468–473, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenberg RL: Ways to improve radiologists’ adherence to fleischner society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radiol 10(6):439–441, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frankovich JF, Longhurst CA, Sutherland SM: Evidence-based medicine in the EMR era. N Engl J Med 365(19):1758–1759, 2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim W, Piraino D: Big data in healthcare: myth, hype, and hope – a point/counterpoint. Town hall meeting conducted at the meeting of the Society of Imaging Informatics in Medicine. National Harbor, MD, 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjun Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Hostetter, J., Morrison, J. et al. Focused Decision Support: a Data Mining Tool to Query the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Dataset and Guide Screening Management for the Individual Patient. J Digit Imaging 29, 160–164 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9826-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9826-0

Keywords