Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Precise position determination using a Galileo E5 single-frequency receiver

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Galileo system offers one dedicated signal that is superior to all other signals currently available in space, namely the broadband signal E5. This signal has a bandwidth of at least 51 MHz using an AltBOC modulation. It features a code range noise at centimeter level. Additionally, the impact of multipath effects on this signal is significantly lower compared to all other available GNSS signals. These unique features of Galileo E5 drastically improve the precision of code range measurements and hence enable precise single-frequency positioning. Certain scientific and non-scientific applications in the positioning domain could likely benefit from the exploitation of E5 measurements. A positioning approach based on an additive combination of code range and carrier phase measurements (CPC—“code-plus-carrier”) to eliminate the ionospheric delay could be used to perform precise positioning over long distances. Unfortunately, this derived observable contains the ambiguity term as an additional unknown what normally requires longer observation windows in order to allow sufficient convergence of the ambiguity parameters. For this reason, a rapid convergence algorithm based on Kalman filtering was implemented in addition to the conventional CPC approach that is also discussed. The CPC-based results yield a positioning precision of 2–5 cm after a convergence time of about 3 h. The rapid convergence filter allows fixing the ambiguity terms within a few minutes, and the obtained position results are at the sub-decimeter level. Regarding one selected test, real data from Galileo experimental satellite GIOVE A were used in order to confirm our assumptions. However, since the current Galileo constellation is not sufficient for real-world positioning trials yet, all major results are based on simulated data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.

References

  • Avila-Rodriguez J-A, Hein GW, Irsigler M, Pany T (2004) Combined Galileo/GPS frequency and signal performance analysis. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS-2004, The Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, California, September 21–24, pp 632–649

  • De Jonge P, Tiberius CH (1996) The LAMBDA method for integer ambiguity estimation: implementation aspects. LGR-series, Publications of the Delft Geodetic Computing Centre, No. 12, TU Delft

  • Eissfeller B, Irsigler M, Avila-Rodriguez JA, Schüler E, Schüler T (2007) Das europäische Satellitennavigationssystem GALILEO—Entwicklungsstand. AVN Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten 02:42–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Erker S, Thölert S, Furthner J, Meurer M (2009) L5—the new GPS Signal. In: Proceedings of IAIN 2009, Stockholm, Sweden, October 27–30

  • European Union (2010) European GNSS (Galileo) open service signal in space interface control document, Reference: OS SIS ICD, Issue 1.1, September, accessible via http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/satnav/galileo/open-service/index_en.htm

  • Irsigler M (2008) Multipath Propagation, mitigation and monitoring in the light of Galileo and the modernized GPS. Dissertation, 2008, University FAF Munich

  • Krueger E, Schüler T, Hein GW, Martellucci A, Blarzino G (2004) Galileo tropospheric correction approaches developed within GSTB-V1. In: Proceedings of GNSS 2004—European Navigation Conference, May 17–19, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  • Krueger E, Schüler T, Arbesser-Rastburg B (2005) The standard tropospheric correction model for the European Satellite Navigation System Galileo. In: Proceedings of the XXVIIIth general assembly of intonation Union of Radio Science (URSI), New Delhi, India, October 23–29

  • Schüler T (2006) Impact of systematic errors on precise long-baseline kinematic GPS positioning. GPS Solut 10(2):108–125. doi:10.1007/s10291-005-0012-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüler T, Diessongo H, Poku-Gyamfi Y (2010) Precise ionosphere-free single-frequency GNSS positioning. GPS Solut 15(2):139–147. doi:10.1007/s10291-010-0177-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivaramaiah N, Dempster AG (2009) The Galileo E5 AltBOC: understanding the signal structure. In: International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society, IGNSS Symposium, Qld, Australia, 1–3 Dec 2009

  • Simsky A, Mertens D, Sleewaegen JM, De Wilde W, Navigation SS, Hollreiser (2008) Multipath and tracking performance of Galileo ranging signals transmitted by GIOVE-B. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS-2008, The Institute of Navigation, Savannah Georgia, September 16–19, pp 1525–1536

  • Sleewaegen JM, De Wilde W (2004) Galileo AltBOC receiver. In: Proceedings of ENC-GNSS 2004, Rotterdam, May 17

  • Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geodesy 70(1–2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG (2000) The success rate and precision of GPS ambiguities. J Geodesy 74(3–4):321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dierendock AJ, Fenton P, Ford T (1992) Theory and performance of narrow correlator spacing in a GPS receiver. Navig: J Inst Navig 39(3):265–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JG (1984) Satellite constellations. J Br Interplanet Soc 37:559–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Stewart MP, Tsakiri M (1998) A discrimination test procedure for ambiguity resolution on-the-fly. J Geodesy 72(11):644–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunck TP (1996) Orbit determination. In: Parkinson BW, Spilker JJ (eds) Global positioning system—theory and applications. AIAA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The results presented were obtained as part of the project “SX5—Scientific Service Support Based on Galileo E5 Receivers.” The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the European Union within the 7th Framework Program under supervision of the European GNSS Agency (GSA). The Galileo E5 receiver adaptations portrayed in this paper are based on receiver technology designed by IFEN GmbH, Germany, which was a member of the SX5 project consortium. The FPGA receiver is based on an adaption of the NAVX-NTR receiver in order to perform Galileo E5 single-frequency positioning and the s/w receiver approach is related to the SX-NSR platform (www.ifen.com).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben Schüler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diessongo, T.H., Schüler, T. & Junker, S. Precise position determination using a Galileo E5 single-frequency receiver. GPS Solut 18, 73–83 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0311-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0311-2

Keywords