Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Deterrence and transmission as mechanisms ensuring reliability of gossip

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spreading information about the members of one’s group is one of the most universal human behaviors. Thanks to gossip, individuals can acquire the information about their peers without sustaining the burden of costly interactions with cheaters, but they can also create and revise social bonds. Gossip has also several positive functions at the group level, promoting cohesion and norm compliance. However, gossip can be unreliable, and can be used to damage others’ reputation or to circulate false information, thus becoming detrimental to people involved and useless for the group. In this work, we propose a theoretical model in which reliability of gossip depends on the joint functioning of two distinct mechanisms. Thanks to the first, i.e., deterrence, individuals tend to avoid informational cheating because they fear punishment and the disruption of social bonds. On the other hand, transmission provides humans with the opportunity of reducing the consequences of cheating through a manipulation of the source of gossip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Transmission is specific as long as we accept that “reputation” is an evaluation in which the source is hidden.

  2. I acknowledge that belief revision is more complex than it is stated in the example.

References

  • Alexander RD (1987) The biology of moral systems hawthorne. Aldine de Gruyter, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayim M (1994) Knowledge through the grapevine: gossip as inquiry. In: Goodman RF, Ben-Ze’ev A (eds) Good gossip Lawrence. University Press of Kansas, KS, pp 85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow JH (1992) Beneath new culture is old psychology: Gossip and social stratification. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 627–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol Lett 2(3):412–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF, Zhang L, Vohs KD (2004) Gossip as cultural learning. Rev Gen Psychol 8:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev A (1994) The vindication of gossip. In: Goodman RF, Ben-Ze’ev A (eds) Good gossip Lawrence. University Press of Kansas, KS, pp 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird RL, Smith EA, Bird DW (2001) The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm CH (1984) Blood revenge: the anthropology of feuding in Montenegro and other nonliterate societies. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham T, Hare B (2007) Engineering human cooperation: does involuntary neural activation increase public goods contributions? Hum Nat 18(2):88–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RW, Whiten A et al (1988) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R, Castelfranchi C (1995) Cognitive and social action. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R, Paolucci M (2002) Reputation in artificial societies: social beliefs for social order. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R, Paolucci M, Sabater J (2008) Reputation for innovating social network’s. Adv Comp Syst 11(2):303–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa R (1994) In praise of gossip: indiscretion as a saintly virtue. In: Goodman RF, Ben-Ze’ev A (eds) Good gossip Lawrence. University Press of Kansas, KS, pp 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tosto G, Giardini F, Conte R (2010) Reputation and economic performance in industrial districts: modelling social complexity through multi-agent systems. In: Takadama K, Cioffi-Revilla C, Deffuant G (eds) The second world congress on social simulation (WCSS08). Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R (1996) Grooming, Gossip and the evolution of language. Faber & Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R (1998) The social brain hypothesis. Evol Anthropol 6:178–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R (2001) Brains on two legs: group size and the evolution of social intelligence. In: de Waal F (ed) Tree of origin. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 173–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R, Schultz F (2007) Evolution in the social brain. Science 317:1344–1347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson RC (1991) Order without law how neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler N (2001) Gossiping. In: Giles H, Robinson WP (eds) Handbook of language and social psychology, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 317–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 7:117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine G, Rosnow R (1978) Gossip, gossipers, gossiping. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 4:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster EK (2004) Research on gossip: taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Rev Gen Psychol 8:78–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith CD, Frith U (2006) How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Res 1079:36–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini F, Conte R (2011) Gossip for social control in natural and artificial societies. Simulation: transactions of the society for modeling and simulation international. doi:10.1177/003754971140691

  • Giardini F, Di Tosto G, Conte R (2008) A model for simulating reputation dynamics in industrial districts. Simul Model Pract Theory 16(2):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini F, Conte R, Paolucci M (forthcoming) Reputation for complex societies. In: In Edmonds B, Meyer R (eds), Handbook on simulating social complexity, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (ISBN/ISSN: 978-3-540-93812-5)

  • Gintis H, Smith EA, Bowles SL (2001) Cooperation and costly signaling. J Theor Biol 213:103–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman M (1963) Gossip and scandal. Curr Anthropol 4:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RF, Ben-Ze’ev A (1994) Good gossip Lawrence. University Press of Kansas, KS

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley KJ, Fessler DMT (2005) Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol Hum Behav 26:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin JK, Wynn K, Bloom P (2007) Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450:557–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haviland JB (1977) Gossip as competition in Zinacantan. J Commun 27:186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Gintis H, Fehr E, Camerer C, McElreath R, Gurven M, Hill K, Barr A, Ensminger J, Tracer D, Marlow F, Patton J, Alvard M, Gil-White F, Smith N (2005) “Economic Man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments from 15 small-scale societies. Behav Brain Sci 28:795–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess NH, Hagen EH (2006) Sex differences in indirect aggression: psychological evidence from young adults. Evol Hum Behav 27:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess NH, Hagen EH (2009) Informational warfare: coalitional gossiping as a strategy for within-group aggression preprint available online at http://anthrovancouverwsuedu/faculty/hess/ Accessed 10 December 2010

  • Humphrey N (1976) The social function of intellect. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 303–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram GPD, Piazza JR, Bering JM (2009) The adaptive problem of absent third-party punishment. In: Høgh-Olesen H, Bertelsen P ,Tønnesvang J (eds) Human characteristics: evolutionary perspectives on human mind and kind. Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, pp 205–229

  • Kniffin KM, Wilson DS (2005) Utilities of gossip across organizational levels: multilevel selection, free-riders and teams. Hum Nat 16:278–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascaro O, Sperber D (2009) The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition 112(3):367–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Harper DGC (1995) Animal signals: models and terminology. J Theor Biol 177:305–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals Oxford. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M, Castelfranchi C (2000) The role of evaluation in cognition and social interaction. In: Dautenhahn K (ed) Human cognition and agent technology. Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck HJ (2002) Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 415:424–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohtashemi M, Mui L (2003) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by social information: the role of trust and reputation in evolution of altruism. J Theor Biol 223:523–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle D (2006) Language: costs and benefits of a specialised system for social information transmission. In: Wells JCK, Strickland S, Laland K (eds) Social information transmission and human biology. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 137–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Noon M, Delbridge R (1993) News from behind my hand: gossip in organizations. Org Stud 14:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–1563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998a) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393:573–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998b) The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 194:561–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsuki H, Iwasa Y (2004) How should we define goodness? Reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 231:107–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paine R (1967) What is gossip about? An alternative hypothesis. Man 2(2):278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchanathan K, Boyd R (2003) A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 224:115–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panchanathan K, Boyd R (2004) Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature 432:499–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza J, Bering JM (2008) Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game. Evol Hum Behav 29(3):172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabater J, Paolucci M, Conte R (2006) RepAge: reputation and image among limited autonomous partners. J Artif Soc Soc Simul vol 9, no 2 http://jassssocsurreyacuk/9/2/3html

  • Scott-Phillips TC (2008) On the correct application of animal signalling theory to human communication, In: Smith ADM, Smith K, Ferrer R, Cancho I (eds), The evolution of language: proceedings of the 7th international conference on the evolution of language, Singapore: World Scientific, p 275–282

  • Smith EA (2010) Communication and collective action: language and the evolution of human cooperation. Evol Hum Behav 31:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck H, Milinski M (2007a) Multiple gossip statements and their effects on reputation and trustworthiness. Proc R Soc B 275:2529–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck H, Semmann D, Milinski M (2007b) Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17435–17440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart PJ, Strathern A (2004) Witchcraft, sorcery, rumors, and gossip for, new departures in anthropology series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor G (1994) Gossip as moral talk. In: Goodman RF, Ben-Ze’ev A (eds) Good gossip Lawrence. University Press of Kansas, KS, pp 34–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind C, Milinski M (2000) Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science 288(5467):850–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman HM (1990) The child’s theory of mind Cambridge. MIT Press, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wert SR, Salovey P (2004) A social comparison account of gossip. Rev Gen Psychol 8:122–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1997) The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Rosaria Conte, Mario Paolucci, Gennaro Di Tosto and all the participants at the International workshop on “Foundations of social signals. An outline”, held in Rome in 2009 for useful comments and insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University (CEU), 1023 Frankel Leo u., 30-34, Budapest, Hungary

    Francesca Giardini

Authors
  1. Francesca Giardini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Giardini.

Additional information

This article is part of the Supplement Issue on “Social Signals. From Theory to Applications,” guest-edited by Isabella Poggi, Francesca D’Errico, and Alessandro Vinciarelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giardini, F. Deterrence and transmission as mechanisms ensuring reliability of gossip. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 2), 465–475 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0421-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0421-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation