Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that executive functions are crucial for advantageous decision making under risk and that therefore decision making is disrupted when working memory capacity is demanded while working on a decision task. While some studies also showed that emotions can affect decision making under risk, it is unclear how affective processing and executive functions predict decision-making performance in interaction. The current experimental study used a between-subjects design to examine whether affective pictures (positive and negative pictures compared to neutral pictures), included in a parallel executive task (working memory 2-back task), have an impact on decision making under risk as assessed by the Game of Dice Task (GDT). Moreover, the performance GDT plus 2-back task was compared to the performance in the GDT without any additional task (GDT solely). The results show that the performance in the GDT differed between groups (positive, negative, neutral, and GDT solely). The groups with affective pictures, especially those with positive pictures in the 2-back task, showed more disadvantageous decisions in the GDT than the groups with neutral pictures and the group performing the GDT without any additional task. However, executive functions moderated the effect of the affective pictures. Regardless of affective influence, subjects with good executive functions performed advantageously in the GDT. These findings support the assumption that executive functions and emotional processing interact in predicting decision making under risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alhakami AS, Slovic P (1994) A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Anal 14:1085–1096. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x
Bagneux V, Bollon T, Dantzer C (2012) Do (un)certainty appraisal tendencies reverse the influence of emotions on risk taking in sequential tasks? Cogn Emot 26:568–576. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.602237
Bayard S, Raffard S, Gely-Nargeot M-C (2011) Do facets of self-reported impulsivity predict decision-making under ambiguity and risk? Evidence from a community sample. Psychiatry Res 190:322–326. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.06.013
Bogg T, Fukunaga R, Finn PR, Brown JW (2012) Cognitive control links alcohol use, trait disinhibition, and reduced cognitive capacity: evidence for medial prefrontal cortex dysregulation during reward-seeking behavior. Drug Alcohol Depend 122:112–118. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.018
Bonatti E, Kuchukhidze G, Zamarian L, Trinka E, Bodner T, Benke T, Delazer M (2009) Decision making in ambiguous and risky situations after unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Behav 14:665–673. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.02.015
Brand M (2008) Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions. J Neuropsychol 2:431–443. doi:10.1348/174866407X220607
Brand M, Fujiwara E, Borsutzky S, Kalbe E, Kessler J, Markowitsch HJ (2005) Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology 19:267–277. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.267
Brand M, Labudda K, Markowitsch HJ (2006) Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations. Neural Netw 19:1266–1276. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.001
Brand M, Grabenhorst F, Starcke K, Vandekerckhove MMP, Markowitsch HJ (2007) Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease. Neuropsychologia 45:1305–1317. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.021
Brand M, Heinze K, Labudda K, Markowitsch HJ (2008) The role of strategies in deciding advantageously in ambiguous and risky situations. Cogn Process 9:159–173. doi:10.1007/s10339-008-0204-4
Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Markowitsch HJ (2009) Decision making with and without feedback: the role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:984–998. doi:10.1080/13803390902776860
Cheung E, Mikels JA (2011) I’m feeling lucky: the relationship between affect and risk-seeking in the framing effect. Emotion 11:852–859. doi:10.1037/a0022854
Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159
Cohen J, Cohen P, Aiken LS, West SG (2003) Applied multiple regression, correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London
Damasio AR, Everitt BJ, Bishop D (1996) The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos T Roy Soc B 351:1413–1420. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125
Delazer M, Sinz H, Zamarian L, Benke T (2007) Decision-making with explicit and stable rules in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 45:1632–1641. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.006
Dijker AJ, Koomen W (1996) Stereotyping and attitudinal effects under time pressure. Eur J Soc Psychol 26:61–74. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199601)26:1<61::aid-ejsp737>3.0.co;2-#
Dolcos F, McCarthy G (2006) Brain systems mediating cognitive interference by emotional distraction. J Neurosci 26:2072–2079. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5042-05.2006
Dolcos F, Diaz-Granados P, Wang L, McCarthy G (2008) Opposing influences of emotional and non-emotional distracters upon sustained prefrontal cortex activity during a delayed-response working memory task. Neuropsychologia 46:326–335. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.010
Erk S, Kleczar A, Walter H (2007) Valence-specific regulation effects in a working memory task with emotional context. Neuroimage 37:623–632. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.006
Euteneuer F, Schaefer F, Stuermer R, Boucsein W, Timmermann L, Barbe MT, Ebersbach G, Otto J, Kessler J, Kalbe E (2009) Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a neuropsychological and psychophysiological study. Neuropsychologia 47:2882–2890. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.014
Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decis Mak 13:1–17
Fond G, Bayard S, Capdevielle D, Del-Monte J, Mimoun N, Macgregor A, Boulenger J-P, Gely-Nargeot M-C, Raffard S (2012) A further evaluation of decision-making under risk and under ambiguity in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 263:249–257. doi:10.1007/s00406-012-0330-y
Gleichgerrcht E, Ibanez A, Roca M, Torralva T, Manes F (2010) Decision-making cognition in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurol 6:611–623. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.148
Heilman RM, Crişan LG, Houser D, Miclea M, Miu AC (2010) Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion 10:257–265. doi:10.1037/a0018489
Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58:697–720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
Keeser D, Padberg F, Reisinger E, Pogarell O, Kirsch V, Palm U, Karch S, Möller HJ, Nitsche MA, Mulert C (2011) Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 55:644–657. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.004
Kensinger EA, Corkin S (2003) Effect of negative emotional content on working memory and long-term memory. Emotion 3:378–393. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.378
Knops A, Nuerk H-C, Fimm B, Vohn R, Willmes K (2006) A special role for numbers in working memory? An fMRI study. Neuroimage 29:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.009
Labudda K, Woermann FG, Mertens M, Pohlmann-Eden B, Markowitsch HJ, Brand M (2008) Neural correlates of decision making with explicit information about probabilities and incentives in elderly healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 187:641–650. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1332-x
Laier C, Schulte FP, Brand M (2012) Pornographic picture processing interferes with working memory performance. J Sex Res pp 1–11. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.716873
Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Brand M (2013) Sexual picture processing interferes with decision-making under ambiguity. Arch Sex Behav pp 1–10. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0119-8
Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (2008) International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. University of Florida, Gainsville
Levens SM, Gotlib IH (2010) Updating positive and negative stimuli in working memory in depression. J Exp Psychol Gen 139:654–664. doi:10.1037/a0020283
Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW (2004) Neuropsychological assessment, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Lie C-H, Specht K, Marshall JC, Fink GR (2006) Using fMRI to decompose the neural processes underlying the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuroimage 30:1038–1049. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.031
Martin EA, Kerns JG (2011) The influence of positive mood on different aspects of cognitive control. Cogn Emot 25:265–279. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.491652
Nelson HE (1976) A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12:313–324
Oaksford M, Morris F, Grainger B, Williams JMG (1996) Mood, reasoning, and central executive processes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:476–492. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.476
Perlstein WM, Elbert T, Stenger VA (2002) Dissociation in human prefrontal cortex of affective influences on working memory-related activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1736–1741. doi:10.1073/pnas.241650598
Pessoa L (2009) How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends Cogn Sci 13:160–166. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006
Phillips LH, Bull R, Adams E, Fraser L (2002) Positive mood and executive function: evidence from stroop and fluency tasks. Emotion 2:12–22. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.12
Preston SD, Buchanan TW, Stansfield RB, Bechara A (2007) Effects of anticipatory stress on decision making in a gambling task. Behav Neurosci 121:257–263. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.257
Romer D, Hennessy M (2007) A biosocial-affect model of adolescent sensation seeking: the role of affect evaluation and peer-group influence in adolescent drug use. Prev Sci 8:89–101. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0064-7
Schiebener J, Zamarian L, Delazer M, Brand M (2011) Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33:1025–1039. doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.595702
Schiebener J, Wegmann E, Pawlikowski M, Brand M (2012) Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker’s executive functions. Cogn Process 13:321–332. doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0522-4
Schoofs D, Preuss D, Wolf OT (2008) Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33:643–653. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.02.004
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24:311–322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
Smith EE, Jonides J (1999) Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science 283:1657–1661. doi:10.1126/science.283.5408.1657
Spies K, Hesse F, Hummitzsch C (1996) Mood and capacity in Baddeley’s model of human memory. Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol [J Psychol J Appl Psychol] 204:367–381
Starcke K, Wolf OT, Markowitsch HJ, Brand M (2008) Anticipatory stress influences decision making under explicit risk conditions. Behav Neurosci 122:1352–1360. doi:10.1037/a0013281
Starcke K, Pawlikowski M, Wolf OT, Altstötter-Gleich C, Brand M (2011) Decision-making under risk conditions is susceptible to interference by a secondary executive task. Cogn Process 12:177–182. doi:10.1007/s10339-010-0387-3
Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms and commentary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Van den Bos R, Harteveld M, Stoop H (2009) Stress and decision-making in humans: performance is related to cortisol reactivity, albeit differently in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrino 34:1449–1458. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.016
Vuilleumier P (2005) How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cogn Sci 9:585–594. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
Yuen KSL, Lee TMC (2003) Could mood state affect risk-taking decisions? J Affect Disord 75:11–18. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00022-8
Acknowledgments
Parts of the work have been supported by the German Research Foundation (BR 2894/6-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gathmann, B., Pawlikowski, M., Schöler, T. et al. Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions. Cogn Process 15, 113–126 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0584-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0584-y