Abstract
Landowners are shaping the landscape, sometimes through wildlife management for hunting purposes; however, no studies have looked at the connection between how landowners view wildlife (their wildlife value orientations—WVO) and, respectively, their attitudes to and stated game management practices potentially affecting the landscape. This study, using a nationally representative data set of landowners in Denmark, makes this connection. Using a utilitarian-pluralist-mutualist-distanced orientation scale, most Danish landowners (especially full-time farmers) were utilitarian followed by pluralist. Utilitarian and pluralist were generally more accepting of game management practices than mutualists and distanced landowners. Landscape- or nature-orientated game management practices were accepted by a clear majority of landowners regardless of WVOs (though utilitarian and pluralists were more positive). More narrow game-orientated management practices were significantly more acceptable for those with a utilitarian and mutualist orientation. In a management context, results are relevant when predicting changes in the rural landscape and the relation to developments in the composition of landowners, and in their WVO. Moreover, in relation to potential conflicts, the general public in Denmark has a higher proportion of mutualists and distanced than among landowners, and are likely to be less accepting of the narrow, game-orientated practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 50:179–211
Brown J, Mitchell B (2000) The stewardship approach and its relevance for protected landscapes. George Wright Forum 17:70–79
Burger, GV, Teer JG (1981) Economic and socioeconomic issues influencing wildlife management on private land. In: Proceedings of wildlife management on private lands symposium. Wisconsin Chapter, The Wildlife Society, Madison, pp 252–278
Cerri J, Mori E, Vivarelli M, Zaccaroni M (2017) Are wildlife value orientations useful tools to explain tolerance and illegal killing of wildlife by farmers in response to crop damage? Eur J Wildlife Res 63(4):70
Christensen AA, Svenningsen SR, Lommer MS, Brandt J (2014) New multifunctional hunting landscapes in Denmark. Dan J Geogr 114:25–40
Conover MR (1998) Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Soc B 26:597–604
Daley SS, Cobb DT, Bromley PT, Sorenson CE (2004) Landowner attitudes regarding wildlife management on private land in North Carolina. Wildlife Soc B 32:209–219
Danmarks Statistik (2012) Landbrug 2012. Statistik om landbrug, gartneri og skovbrug. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Danmarks Statistik (2015) Statistisk Årbog 2015. [Statistical yearbook 2015]. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen
Decker DJ, Siemer WF, Forstchen AB, Smith C (2018) The role of human dimensions in state wildlife management. In: Ryder J (ed) State wildlife management conservation. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 194–237
Delibes-Mateos M, Giergiczny M, Caro J, Vinuela J, Riera P, Arroyo B (2014) Does hunters’ willingness to pay match the best hunting options for biodiversity conservation? A choice experiment application for small-game hunting in Spain. Biol Conserv 177:36–42
FACE (2018) Biodiversity. The European Federation of Associations for Hunting & Conservation (FACE) https://www.face.eu/nature-conservation/biodiversity/. Accessed 23 August 2018
Fulton DC, Manfredo MJ, Lipscomb J (1996) Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dim Wildlife 1:24–47
Gamborg C, Jensen FS (2016a) Wildlife value orientations: a quantitative study of the general public in Denmark. Human Dim Wildl 21:34–46
Gamborg C, Jensen FS (2016b) Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public: a Danish comparative quantitative study. Human Dim Wildl 21:328–344
Gamborg C, Jensen FS (2017) Attitudes to recreational hunting: a quantitative survey of the general public in Denmark. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 17:20–28
Gamborg C, Palmer C, Sandøe P (2012) Ethics of wildlife management and conservation: what should we try to protect? Nat Educ Knowl 3(10):8
Gamborg C, Jensen FS, Sandøe P (2016) A dividing issue: attitudes to game bird shooting among landowners, hunters and the general public in Denmark. Land Use Policy 57:296–304
Genghini M, Spalatro F, Gellini S (2002) Farmers’ attitudes toward the carrying out of wildlife habitat improvement actions (WHIA) in intensive agricultural areas of Northern Italy. Z Jagdwiss 48:309–319
Golden KE, Peterson MN, DePerno CS, Bardon RE, Moorman CE (2013) Factors shaping private landowner engagement in wildlife management. Wildlife Soc B 37:94–100
Herzon I, Mikk M (2007) Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity and their willingness to enhance it through agri-environment schemes: a comparative study from Estonia and Finland. J Nat Conserv 15:10–25
Iversen T (2017) Markvildtlavenes indsats 2017. Jæger 10:45–46
Kaltenborn BP, Bjerke T, Vitterso J (1999) Attitudes toward large carnivores among sheep farmers, wildlife managers and research biologists in Norway. Human Dim Wildl 4:57–73
Kellert SR (1984) Wildlife values and the privatel and owner. Am Forests 90:002060–002061
Lund JF, Jensen FS (2017) Is recreational hunting important for landscape multi-functionality? Evidence from Denmark. Land Use Policy 61:389–397
Manfredo MJ, Vaske JJ, Decker D (1995) Human dimensions of wildlife management: basic concepts. In: Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 17–31
Miljø-og Fødevareministeriet (2017) Bekendtgørelse om udsætning af vildt, jagtmåder og jagtredskaber (Bekendtgørelse nr. 1652 af 19/12/2017. https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=196508, 19.08.2018). Accessed 19 August 2018
Mills J, Gaskell P, Ingram J, Chaplin S (2018) Understanding farmers’ motivations for providing unsubsidised environmental benefits. Land Use Policy 76:697–707
Mustin K, Newey S, Irvine J, Arroyo B, Redpath S (2010) Biodiversity impacts of game bird hunting and associated management practices in Europe and North America. Contract Report. James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, 71 pp
Primdahl J, Bojesen M, Vesterager JP, Kristensen LS (2012) Hunting and landscape in Denmark: farmers’ management of hunting rights and landscape changes. Landsc Res 37:659–672
Raymond CM, Bieling C, Fagerholm N, Martin-Lopez B, Plieninger T (2016) The farmer as a landscape steward: comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions. Ambio 45:173–184
Renting H, Rossing WA, Groot JC, Van der Ploeg JD, Laurent C, Perraud D, Stobbelaar DJ, Van Ittersum MK (2009) Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J Environ Manag 90:S112–S123
Rose DC, Keating C, Morris C (2018) Understanding how to influence farmers’ decision-making behaviour: a social science literature review. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, University of East Anglia, Norwich
Søndergaard N (2009) Natur- og Vildtpleje. Landbrugsforlaget, Aarhus
Teel T, Dayer A, Manfredo M, Bright A (2005) Regional results from the research project entitled “Wildlife Values in the West”. (Project Rep. No. 58). Project Report for the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit, Fort Collins, CO.
Vandervell A, Coles C (1980) Game & the English landscape. The influence of the chase on sporting art and scenery. Debrett’s Peerage, London
Zinn HC, Manfredo MJ, Barro SC (2002) Patterns of wildlife value orientations in hunters’ families. Human Human Dim Wildl 7:147–162
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this work from the “15. Juni Fonden”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gamborg, C., Lund, J.F. & Jensen, F.S. Landowners’ wildlife value orientations, attitudes and behaviour in relation to game management practices. Eur J Wildl Res 65, 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1245-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1245-3