Abstract
In this paper, we investigate a model of a combinatorial, procurement multi-attribute auction, in which each sales item is defined by several attributes called quality, the buyer is the auctioneer (e.g., a government), and the sellers are the bidders. Furthermore, there exist multiple items and both buyer and sellers can have arbitrary (e.g., substitutable/complementary) preferences on a bundle of items. Our goal is to develop a protocol that is strategy-proof for sellers. We first present a VickreyClarkeGroves (VCG)-type protocol. As in a standard combinatorial auction, a VCG-type protocol is not false-name-proof, i.e., it is vulnerable against manipulations using multiple identifiers. Next, we show that any strategy-proof protocol in this model can be represented as a framework called Price-Oriented Rationing-Free (PORF) protocol, in which for each bidder, for each bundle of items, and for each quality, the payment for the bidder is determined independently of his own declaration, and the bidder can obtain a bundle that maximizes his utility independently of the allocations of other bidders. We develop a false-name-proof protocol in this model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
M. Bichler (2000) ArticleTitle“An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auction” Decision Support Syst 28 IssueID3 249–268 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00075-0
M. Bichler and J. Kalagnanam, “Bidding languages and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions”. Technical Report RC 22478, IBM Research Report, 2002.
Y. Che (1993) ArticleTitle“Design competition through multidimensional auctions” RAND. J. Econ 24 IssueID4 668–680
E. H. Clarke (1971) ArticleTitle“Multipart pricing of public goods” Public Choice 2 19–33
E. David, R. Azoulay-Schwartz, and S. Kraus, “Protocols and strategies for automated multi-attribute auctions”. in: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2002), pp. 77–85, 2002.
E. David, R. Azoulay-Schwartz, and S. Kraus, “Bidders’ strategy for multi-attribute sequential English auction with a Deadline”. in: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent systems (AAMAS-2003), pp. 457–464, 2003.
S. Vries Particlede R. V. Vohra (2003) ArticleTitleCombinatorial auctions: A survey” INFORMS J Comput 15 284–309 Occurrence Handle10.1287/ijoc.15.3.284.16077
A. Giovannucci, J. A. Rodríguez-Aguilar, A. Reyes, F. X. Noria, and J. Cerquides, “Towards automated procurement via agent-aware negotiation support”, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2004), pp. 244–251, 2004.
T. Groves (1973) ArticleTitle“Incentives in teams” Econometrica 41 617–631
A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, 1995.
R. B. Myerson (1981) ArticleTitle“Optimal auction design” Math. Operat. Res 6 58–73
D. C. Parkes and L. H. Ungar, “Iterative combinatorial auctions: Theory and practice”. in: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), pp. 74–81, 2000.
T. Sandholm, “An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auction”, in: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99). pp. 542–547, 1999.
W. Vickrey (1961) ArticleTitle“Counter speculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders” J. Finance 16 8–37
M. Yokoo, “Characterization of strategy/False-name proof combinatorial auction protocols: Price-oriented, rationing-free protocol”. in: Proceedings of 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2003), pp. 733–739, 2003.
M. Yokoo Y. Sakurai S. Matsubara (2001) ArticleTitleRobust combinatorial auction protocol against false-name bids” Artif, Intell 130 IssueID2 167–181
M. Yokoo Y. Sakurai S. Matsubara (2004) ArticleTitleThe effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: New fraud in Internet auctions” Games Econ. Behav 46 IssueID1 174–188 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00045-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suyama, T., Yokoo, M. Strategy/False-name Proof Protocols for Combinatorial Multi-Attribute Procurement Auction. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 11, 7–21 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-0983-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-0983-2