Abstract
One of the simple assembly line balancing problems (SALBPs), known as SALBP-E, is considered. It consists in assigning a given set V={1,2,…,n} of elementary tasks to linearly ordered workstations with respect to precedence and capacity restrictions while minimizing the following product: number of used workstations × working time on the most loaded one. The stability of feasible and optimal solutions for this problem with regard to possible variations of the processing time of certain tasks is investigated. Two heuristic procedures finding a compromise between the efficiency and the considered stability measure of studied solutions are suggested and evaluated on known benchmarks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ağpak, K., & Gökçen, H. (2007). A chance-constrained approach to stochastic line balancing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(3), 1098–1115.
Baykasoğlu, A., & Özbakır, L. (2007). Stochastic U-line balancing using genetic algorithms. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 32(1–2), 139–147.
Belgacem, T., & Hifi, M. (2008). Sensitivity analysis of the knapsack sharing problem: perturbation of the weight of an item. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 35(1), 295–308.
Billaut, J. C., Moukrim, A., & Sanlaville, E. (Eds.) (2008). Flexibility and robustness in scheduling. New York: Wiley.
Chiang, W. C., & Urban, T. (2006). The stochastic U-line balancing problem: a heuristic procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(3), 1767–1781.
Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria optimization (2nd ed.). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Emelichev, V., Girlich, E., Nikulin, Y., & Podkopaev, D. (2002). Stability and regularization of vector problems of integer linear programming. Optimization, 51(4), 645–676.
Emelichev, V., & Podkopaev, D. (2010). Quantitative stability analysis for vector problems of 0–1 programming. Discrete Optimization, 7(1–2), 48–63.
Erel, E., Sabuncuoglu, I., & Sekerci, H. (2005). Stochastic assembly line balancing using beam search. International Journal of Production Research, 43(7), 1411–1426.
Gamberini, R., Gebennini, E., Grassi, A., & Regattieri, A. (2009). A multiple single-pass heuristic algorithm solving the stochastic assembly line rebalancing problem. International Journal of Production Research, 47(8), 2141–2164.
Gen, M., Tsujimura, Y., & Li, Y. (1996). Fuzzy assembly line balancing using genetic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 31(3–4), 631–634.
Guinand, F., Moukrim, A., & Sanlaville, E. (2004). Sensitivity analysis of tree scheduling on two machines with communication delays. Parallel Computing, 30(1), 103–120.
Hall, N., & Posner, M. (2004). Sensitivity analysis for scheduling problems. Journal of Scheduling, 7(1), 49–83.
Hop, N. (2006). A heuristic solution for fuzzy mixed-model line balancing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(3), 798–810.
Kılınç-Karzan, F., Toriello, A., Ahmed, S., Nemhauser, G., & Savelsberg, M. (2009). Approximating the stability region for binary mixed-integer programs. Operations Research Letters, 37(4), 250–254.
Libura, M. (1999). On accuracy of solutions for discrete optimization problems with perturbed coefficients of the objective function. Annals of Operations Research, 86(0), 53–62.
Libura, M., & Nikulin, Y. (2006). Stability and accuracy functions in multicriteria linear combinatorial optimization problems. Annals of Operations Research, 147(1), 255–267.
Libura, M., van der Poort, E., Sierksma, G., & van der Veen, J. (1998). Stability aspects of the traveling salesman problem based on k-best solutions. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 87(1–3), 159–185.
Liu, S., Ong, H., & Huang, H. (2005). A bidirectional heuristic for stochastic assembly line balancing type II problem. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(1–2), 71–77.
Petrovic, S., Fayad, C., & Petrovic, D. (2008). Sensitivity analysis of a fuzzy multiobjective scheduling problem. International Journal of Production Research, 46(12), 3327–3344.
Pettie, S. (2005). Sensitivity analysis of minimum spanning trees in sub-inverse-Ackermann time. In Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 3827. Algorithms and computation (pp. 964–973). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Rekiek, B., Dolgui, A., Delchambre, A., & Bratcu, A. (2002). State of art of optimization methods for assembly line design. Annual Reviews in Control, 26(2), 163–174.
Rosenblatt, M., & Carlson, R. (1985). Designing a production line to maximize profit. IIE Transactions, 17(2), 117–122.
Scholl, A. (1999). Balancing and sequencing of assembly lines (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Sotskov, Y., Wagelmans, A., & Werner, F. (1998). On the calculation of the stability radius of an optimal or an approximate schedule. Annals of Operations Research, 83(0), 213–252.
Sotskov, Y., Dolgui, A., & Portmann, M. C. (2006). Stability analysis of an optimal balance for an assembly line with fixed cycle time. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(3), 783–797.
Sotskov, Y., Sotskova, N., Lai, T. C., & Werner, F. (2010). Scheduling under uncertainty: theory and algorithms. Minsk: Belorusskaya Nauka.
Tasan, S., & Tunali, S. (2008). A review of the current applications of genetic algorithms in assembly line balancing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(1), 49–69.
Tsujimura, Y., Gen, M., & Kubota, E. (1995). Solving fuzzy assembly-line balancing problem with genetic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 29(1–4), 543–547.
Urban, T., & Chiang, W. C. (2006). An optimal piecewise-linear program for the U-line balancing problem with stochastic task times. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(3), 771–782.
Van Hoesel, S., & Wagelmans, A. (1993). Sensitivity analysis of the economic lot-sizing problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 45(3), 291–312.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurevsky, E., Battaïa, O. & Dolgui, A. Balancing of simple assembly lines under variations of task processing times. Ann Oper Res 201, 265–286 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1203-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1203-5