Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Influential DMUs and outlier detection in data envelopment analysis with an application to health care

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explains some drawbacks on previous approaches for detecting influential observations in deterministic nonparametric data envelopment analysis models as developed by Yang et al. (Annals of Operations Research 173:89–103, 2010). For example efficiency scores and relative entropies obtained in this model are unimportant to outlier detection and the empirical distribution of all estimated relative entropies is not a Monte-Carlo approximation. In this paper we developed a new method to detect whether a specific DMU is truly influential and a statistical test has been applied to determine the significance level. An application for measuring efficiency of hospitals is used to show the superiority of this method that leads to significant advancements in outlier detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P., & Peterson, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., & Chang, H. (2006). The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 1311–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsel, M., & Davutyan, N. (2011). Hospital efficiency with risk adjusted mortality as undesirable output: The Turkish case. Annals of Operations Research, 1–16.

  • Chang, S. J., Hsiao, H. C., Huang, L. H., & Chang, H. (2011). Taiwan quality indicator project and hospital productivity growth. Omega, 39(1), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other re-sampling plans. In B. Efron (Ed.), Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics CBMS-NSF Monographs, 38, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics:Philadelphia

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 42(3), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Ross, P. (1994). Productivity developments in Swedish hospital: A Malmquist output index approach (pp. 253–272). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, K., & Emrouznejad, A. (2003). Measuring the performance of neonatal care units in scotland. Journal of Medical Systems, 27(4), 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., & Emrouznejad, A. (2012). Productivity growth and efficiency measurements in fuzzy environments with an application to health care. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2(2), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, B. (2008). Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health Economics, 17, 1107–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. L., & McGinnis, L. F. (2008). Outlier detection in two-stage semiparametric DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(2), 629–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., & Sambo, L. G. (2002). Measurement of technical efficiency of public hospitals in Kenya: Using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 26(1), 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., Sambo, L. G., Munguti, N., & Liambila, W. (2004). Using data envelopment analysis to measure the technical efficiency of public health centres in Kenya. Journal of Medical Systems, 28(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., Vaz, R. G., Bastiene, H., & Padayachy, J. (2008). A comparative assessment of performance and productivity of health centers in Seychelles. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(1), 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masiye, F., Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., & Chimfwembe, D. (2003). Efficiency of health centres in Zambia: Using data envelopment analysis. WHO, Brazzaville, Congo: Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, L., Rauner, M., Heidenberger, K., & Kraus, M. (2008). A cross-national comparison and taxonomy of DEA-based hospital efficiency studies. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 42(3), 158–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, P., & Vierstraete, V. (2004). Technological change and efficiency in the presence of quasi-fixed inputs: A DEA application to the hospital sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(3), 755–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). A statistical test for detecting influential observations in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 542–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puig-Junoy, J. (2000). Partitioning input cost efficiency into its allocative and technical components: An empirical DEA application to hospitals. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(3), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, B. L., & Triantis, K. P. (1989). The implications of using messy data to estimate production-frontierbased technical efficiency measures. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. (1992). Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric methods with bootstrapping. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 167–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. (1996). Aspects of statistical analysis in DEA-type frontiers models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 117–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. (2003). Detecting outliers in frontier models: A simple approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 391–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 4961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(6), 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2001). Testing restrictions in nonparametric frontier models. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 30, 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2002). Nonparametric tests of returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson Kazley, A., & Ozcan, Y. A. (2009). Electronic medical record use and efficiency: A DEA and windows analysis of hospitals. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 43(3), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. W. (1993). Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11, 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. W. (1995). Detects influential observations in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Wang, X., & Sun, D. (2010). Using the bootstrap method to detect influential DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 173, 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Iran University of Science & Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran

    Ali Reza Bahari

  2. Operations and Information Management Group, Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Ali Emrouznejad

Authors
  1. Ali Reza Bahari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Emrouznejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Emrouznejad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahari, A.R., Emrouznejad, A. Influential DMUs and outlier detection in data envelopment analysis with an application to health care. Ann Oper Res 223, 95–108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1604-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1604-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation