Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations

  • Big Data Analytics in Operations & Supply Chain Management
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work makes a case for the integration of the increasingly popular and largely separate topics of Industry 4.0 and the circular economy (CE). The paper extends the state-of-the-art literature by proposing a pioneering roadmap to enhance the application of CE principles in organisations by means of Industry 4.0 approaches. Advanced and digital manufacturing technologies are able to unlock the circularity of resources within supply chains; however, the connection between CE and Industry 4.0 has not so far been explored. This article therefore contributes to the literature by unveiling how different Industry 4.0 technologies could underpin CE strategies, and to organisations by addressing those technologies as a basis for sustainable operations management decision-making. The main results of this work are: (a) a discussion on the mutually beneficial relationship between Industry 4.0 and the CE; (b) an in-depth understanding of the potential contributions of smart production technologies to the ReSOLVE model of CE business models; (c) a research agenda for future studies on the integration between Industry 4.0 and CE principles based on the most relevant management theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: The authors

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadov, Y., & Helo, P. (2016). A cloud based job sequencing with sequence-dependent setup for sheet metal manufacturing. Annals of Operations Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2304-3.

  • Akter, S., & Wamba, S. F. (2017). Big data and disaster management: A systematic review and agenda for future research.Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2584-2.

  • Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H., Baur, C., Mohr, D., Tschiesner, A., Weskamp, T., Alicke, K., & Wee, D. (2016). Industry 4.0 after the initial hype–Where manufacturers are finding value and how they can best capture it. McKinsey Digital, available in https://www.mckinsey.de/files/mckinsey_industry_40_2016.pdf Accessed August 2017.

  • Bocken, N. M., Olivetti, E. A., Cullen, J. M., Potting, J., & Lifset, R. (2017). Taking the circularity to the next level: A special issue on the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 476–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Xu, L., He, W., & Li, S. (2014). Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Transactions on industrial informatics, 10(4), 2233–2243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despeisse, M., Baumers, M., Brown, P., Charnley, F., Ford, S. J., Garmulewicz, A., et al. (2017). Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Man, J. C., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2017). An Industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models. Procedia CIRP, 63, 721–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Tang, W., Zhao, J., & Nie, T. (2016). Sell to whom? Firm’s green production in competition facing market segmentation. Annals of Operations Research, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2291-4.

  • Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2741–2751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). European resource efficiency platform pushes for ‘product passports’. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap/about-eco-innovation/policies-matters/eu/20130708_european-resource-efficiency-platform-pushes-for-product-passports_en. Accessed August 2017.

  • Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Gunasekaran, A., & Farahani, R. (2017). Decision models for sustainable supply chain design and management. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 277–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., & Pascucci, S. (2017). Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., & Doberstein, B. (2008). Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving ’leapfrog development’. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(3), 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., Ulgiati, S., & Zhang, P. (2013). Measuring China’s circular economy. Science, 339(6127), 1526–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A., Irani, Z., & Papadopoulos, T. (2014). Modelling and analysis of sustainable operations management: Certain investigations for research and applications. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(6), 806–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Stuart L., & Dowell, Glen. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016, January). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3928–3937). IEEE.

  • Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, J., Holweg, M., Khajavi, S. H., & Partanen, J. (2016). The direct digital manufacturing (r) evolution: Definition of a research agenda. Operations Management Research, 9(1–2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P. F., Hu, P. J. H., Wei, C. P., & Huang, J. W. (2014). Green purchasing by MNC subsidiaries: The role of local tailoring in the presence of institutional duality. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 647–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., et al. (2016). Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(1), 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilhacker, M. L., & Minner, S. (2017). Supply chain risk management for critical commodities: A system dynamics model for the case of the rare earth elements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 125, 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. business & information. Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Chi, T., Hao, T., & Yu, T. (2016). Customer demand analysis of the electronic commerce supply chain using Big Data. Annals of Operations Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2342-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Li, H., Wang, W., & Dong, Y. (2012). Constructivism scenario evolutionary analysis of zero emission regional planning: A case of Qaidam Circular Economy Pilot Area in China. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomba, A. P. S., & Nakashima, K. (2012). Enhancing value in reverse supply chains by sorting before product recovery. Production Planning and Control, 23(2–3), 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, D. E., & Waughray, D. (2016). Intelligent assets. Unlocking the circular economy potential. Report of Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

  • MacArthur, D. E., Zumwinkel, K., & Stuchtey, M. R. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Report of Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

  • Mathews, J. A., & Tan, H. (2016). Lessons from China: The country consumes the most resources in the world and produces the most waste-but it also has the most advanced solutions. Nature, 531(7595), 440–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, W., Geng, Y., Huang, B., Barteková, E., Bleischwitz, R., Türkeli, S., & Doménech, T. (2017). Circular economy policies in China and Europe. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 651–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, M. H. A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Koh, S. C. L., & Yamoah, F. (2017). Comparing linear and circular supply chains: Acase study from the construction industry. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rymaszewska, A., Helo, P., & Gunasekaran, A. (2017). IoT powered servitization of manufacturing: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roblek, V., Meško, M., & Krapež, A. (2016). A complex view of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open, 6(2), 2158244016653987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., & Miragliotta, G. (2014, December). Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 697–701). IEEE.

  • Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 40, 536–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, T. K. (2017). Industry 4.0: A Korea perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015). Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 16–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trentesaux, D., Borangiu, T., & Thomas, A. (2016). Emerging ICT concepts for smart, safe and sustainable industrial systems. Computers in Industry, 81, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tupa, J., Simota, J., & Steiner, F. (2017). Aspects of risk management implementation for Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1223–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Beukel, J. (2017). Making business and economic sense of climate change. PWC Sustainability and Climate Change Blog. http://pwc.blogs.com/sustainability/2017/06/industry-40-as-an-enabler-of-the-circular-economy.html. Accessed August 2017.

  • Vanderroost, M., Ragaert, P., Verwaeren, J., De Meulenaer, B., De Baets, B., & Devlieghere, F. (2017). The digitization of a food package’s life cycle: Existing and emerging computer systems in the pre-logistics phase. Computers in Industry, 87, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waibel, M. W., Steenkamp, L. P., Moloko, N., & Oosthuizen, G. A. (2017). Investigating the effects of smart production systems on sustainability elements. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 731–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Törngren, M., & Onori, M. (2015). Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37(2), 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winans, K., Kendall, A., & Deng, H. (2017). The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 825–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, K. (2017). Internet of things, big data, Industry 4.0: Innovative solutions in logistics and supply chains management. Procedia Engineering, 182, 763–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C., Xu, X., & Lu, Y. (2015). Computer-integrated manufacturing, cyber-physical systems and cloud manufacturing: Concepts and relationships. Manufacturing Letters, 6, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, Y., Tan, K. H., Li, Y., & Tse, Y. K. (2016). Unlocking the power of big data in new product development. Annals of Operations Research, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2379-x.

  • Zhao, S., & Zhu, Q. (2015). Remanufacturing supply chain coordination under the stochastic remanufacturability rate and the random demand. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1–2), 661–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, R. Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. T. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: A review. Engineering, 3(5), 616–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Jabbour, C.J.C., Godinho Filho, M. et al. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Ann Oper Res 270, 273–286 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8

Keywords