Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Greek sovereign crisis and European exchange rates: effects of news releases and their providers

  • S.I.: BALCOR-2017
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the contribution of the geographical (both the regional and international) aspect of news releases, related to the Greek sovereign debt crisis. We investigate the impact of the Greek debt crisis via economic news and surprises on Euro exchange rate volatility and volatility-jumps within a Tobit regression framework. In particular, the impact of three categories of news is examined via the respective number of dummy variables, the number of news per day, and news surprises of 2-year, 5-year and 10-year government bonds and CDS. Also, the role of news releases providers is researched. The analysis starts from 1 July 2009 and ends on 31 May 2015. The data comprises intraday prices for (1) Euro to US dollar (Euro/USD), (2) Euro to Japanese yen (Euro/JPY), (3) Euro to Great British pound (Euro/GBP), (4) Euro to Swiss franc (Euro/CHF) and (5) Euro to Australian dollar (Euro/AUD). Our findings reveal that Greek events have an important impact on the behavior of the Euro exchange market. Secondly, the identity of the provider of news releases about the Greek sovereign crisis affects Europeś exchange rates highlighting homogeneity problems in the Eurozone. The uncertainty, introduced by the Greek sovereign crisis, as shown by our findings, signifies the financial instability in the Eurozone and the strength of the Euro currency. This is vital for policymakers in a common currency environment. Policymakers could evaluate such findings and re-examine the structural plan of the Euro, targeting primarily at the financial integration of the member states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Bovi and Cerqueti (2016), Sensoy et al. (2018) and Sun et al. (2018), among others.

  2. For a detailed analysis of the dynamics of the Greek debt crisis, see Ardagna and Caselli (2014).

  3. See Arghyrou and Tsoukalas (2011).

  4. Previous literature shows that the conditional mean adjustments of exchange rates to macroeconomic news occur quickly, within a few minutes following the news announcement, thus effectively amounting to jumps (Andersen et al. 2007). Therefore, in markets where return reaction to announcements is rapid (as is the case with FX markets), the use of wider return windows may contaminate the announcement effects, since longer intervals may include other events as well. This would reduce the public signal to noise ratio and introduce bias in the news response coefficients. To mitigate this bias, many studies on the FX literature use high frequency data to examine the announcement effects (Goldberg and Grisse 2013).

  5. See for example Jiang et al. (2012) and Kutan et al. (2012).

  6. Piccotti (2018) obtained data on pre-scheduled macroeconomic news events from FXStreet. In our study, we also cross-checked all events in Trading Economics and Bloomberg.

  7. We follow the work of Patton (2011) in order to select the two most consistent estimators. For the comparison of estimation accuracy, we use the Quasi-Likelihood (QLIKE) loss function, as it leads to more accurate evaluations in rejecting inferior estimators. In particular, we measure accuracy using the QLIKE distance measure, based on squared open-to-close returns as a volatility benchmark/proxy, with one-day lead to break the dependence between estimation error in the realized measure and error in the proxy. The selection is based on the following eight classes of realized volatility estimators which are: naïve realized variance (Andersen et al. 2001a, b), bias-corrected for microstructure noise and optimally sampled realized variance (Bandi and Russell 2008), first-order autocorrelation-adjusted realized variance (Hansen and Lunde 2006), two-scale realized variance (Zhang et al. 2005), realized non-flat-top Parzen kernel (Barndorff-Nielsen et al. 2011), pre-averaged realized variance (Podolskij and Vetter 2009), realized range-based variance (Christensen and Podolskij 2007), maximum likelihood realized variance (Ait-Sahalia et al. 2005) and realized kernel estimator of Barndorff-Nielsen et al. (2009).

  8. We mention at the case where the observations occur at equidistant time intervals \(\Delta \), in which case the parameter \(\sigma ^{2}\) is estimated at time T on the basis of \(N+1\) discrete observations recorded at times \(t_{0}=0\), \(t_{1}=\Delta \), ...,\(t_{N}=N\Delta =T\), see Ait-Sahalia et al. (2005).

  9. This estimator performs better in high-frequency intraday data, due to covering higher number of observations.

  10. Intensity and magnitude of volatility-jumps do not change significantly, when a 1% significance level has been employed.

  11. Intensity and magnitude of volatility-jumps do not change significantly, when a 1% significance level has been employed.

  12. The relative (aggregated) impacts are based on absolute raw impacts.

References

  • Ait-Sahalia, Y., Mykland, P. A., & Zhang, L. (2005). How often to sample a continuous-time process in the presence of market microstructure noise. Review of Financial Studies, 18, 351–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. G., Bolerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., & Labys, P. (2003). Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica, 71(2), 579–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1998). DM-dollar volatility: Intraday activity patterns, macroeconomic announcements and longer run dependencies. Journal of Finance, 53, 219–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X. (2007). Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling and forecasting of return volatility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 701–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., & Ebens, H. (2001a). The distribution of realized stock return volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., & Labys, P. (2001b). The distribution of realized exchange rate volatility. Journal of American Statistical Association, 96, 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. G., Dobrev, D., & Schaumburg, E. (2012). Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncation. Journal of Econometrics, 169(1), 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardagna, S., & Caselli, F. (2014). The political economy of the Greek debt crisis: A tale of two bailouts. A American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(4), 291–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arghyrou, M. G., & Tsoukalas, J. D. (2011). The Greek debt crisis: Likely causes, mechanics and outcomes. World Economy, 34, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balduzzi, P., Elton, E. J., & Green, T. C. (2001). Economic news and bond prices: Evidence from the U.S. treasury market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36, 523–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balter, J. (2014). Quarticity estimation on OHLC data. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 13, 505–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandi, F. M., & Russell, J. R. (2008). Microstructure noise, realized variance, and optimal sampling. Review of Economic Studies, 75(2), 339–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Graversen, E., Jacod, J., & Shephard, N. (2006). Limit theorems for bipower variation in financial econometrics. Econometric Theory, 22, 677–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A., & Shephard, N. (2009). Realized kernels in practice: Traders and quotes. Econometrics Journal, 12(3), C1–C32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A., & Shephard, N. (2011). Subsampling realized kernels. Journal of Econometrics, 160(1), 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2004). Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2006). Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, P., & Santa-Clara, P. (2015). Momentum has its moments. Journal of Financial Economics, 116, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetsma, R., Giuliodori, M., de Jong, F., & Widijanto, D. (2013). Spread the news: The impact of news on the European sovereign bond markets during the crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 34, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., & Hoerova, M. (2014). The VIX, the variance premium and stock market volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 183(2), 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhanot, K., Burns, N., Hunter, D., & Williams, M. (2014). News spillovers from the Greek debt crisis: Impact on the Eurozone financial sector. Journal of Banking and Finance, 38, 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovi, M., & Cerqueti, R. (2016). Forecasting macroeconomic fundamentals in economic crises. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 451–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M. K., & Pedersen, L. H. (2009). Market liquidity and funding liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2201–2238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, V., & Shin, H. S. (2015). Capital flows and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 71, 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, X., Chen, Y., & Zolotoy, L. (2017). Stock liquidity and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(04), 1605–1637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatrath, A., Miao, H., Ramchander, S., & Villupurum, S. (2014). Currency jumps, co-jumps, and the role of macro news. Journal of International Money and Finance, 40, 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K., Oomen, R., & Podolskij, M. (2010). Realised quantile-based estimation of the integrated variance. Journal of Econometrics, 159(1), 74–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K., & Podolskij, M. (2007). Realized range-based estimation of integrated variance. Journal of Econometrics, 141(2), 323–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio, A., Lotfi, S., & Zenios, S. A. (2018). Portfolio diversification in the sovereign credit swap markets. Annals of Operations Research, 266(12), 533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T., & Korn, S. (1991). The reaction of interest rates to the employment report: The role of policy anticipations. FRB Richmond Economic Review, 77(5), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, F., Pirino, D., & Reno, R. (2010). Threshold bipower variation and the impact of jumps on volatility forecasting. Journal of Econometrics, 159, 276–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dungey, M., McKenzie, M., & Smith, L. V. (2009). Empirical evidence on jumps in the term structure of the U.S. treasury market. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16, 430–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D., & Lyons, R. K. (2008). How is macro news transmitted to exchange rates? Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), 26–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatum, R., Hutchison, M., & Wu, T. (2012). Asymmetries and state dependence: The impact of macro surprises on intraday exchange rates. Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 26, 542–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, J., Rogers, J. H., Wang, S., & Wright, J. H. (2007). The high-frequency response of exchange rates and interest rates to macroeconomic announcements. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1051–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawley, B. W., & Neely, C. J. (2013). Four stories of quantitative easing. Review-Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 95(1), 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. (1999). No Single Currency Regime is Right for all Countries or at all Times. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratzscher, M., Lo Duca, M., & Straub, R. (2016). On the international spillovers of US quantitative easing. The Economic Journal, 128(608), 330–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, K. R., Schwert, G. W., & Stambaugh, R. F. (1987). Expected stock returns and volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 19, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L., & Grisse, C. (2013). Time variation in asset price responses to macro announcements: The role of risk. NBER Working paper, No. 19523.

  • Gourinchas, P., Rey, H., & Govillot, N. (2010). Exorbitant privilege and exorbitant duty. IMES Discussion paper series, No. 2010-E-20.

  • Hansen, P. R., & Huang, Z. (2016). Exponential GARCH modeling with realized measures of volatility. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 34, 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. (2006). Realized variance and market microstructure noise. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 24(2), 127–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayo, B., & Neuenkirch, M. (2010). Do federal reverse communications help predict federal funds target rate decisions? Journal of Macroeconomics, 32, 1014–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., & Tauchen, G. (2005). The relative contribution of jumps to total price variance. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 3, 456–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G. J., Konstantinidi, E., & Skiadopoulos, G. (2012). Volatility spillovers and the effect of news announcements. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(8), 2260–2273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G. J., Lo, I., & Verdelhan, A. (2011). Information shocks, liquidity shocks, jumps, and price discovery: Evidence from the U.S treasury market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46, 527–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnaukh, N., Ranaldo, A., & Soderlind, P. (2015). Understanding FX liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 28(11), 3073–3108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmidou, K., Kousenidis, D., & Negakis, C. (2015). The impact of the EU/ECB/IMF bailout programs on the financial and real sectors of the ASE during the Greek sovereign crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50, 440–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutmos, D. (2018). Interdependencies between CDS spreads in the European Union: Is Greece the black sheep or black swan? Annals of Operations Research, 266(1–2), 441–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraussl, R., Lehnert, T., & Stefanova, D. (2016). The European sovereign debt crisis: What have we learned? Journal of Empirical Finance, 38, 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurov, A., & Stan, R. (2018). Monetary policy uncertainty and the market reaction to macroeconomic news. Journal of Banking and Finance, 86, 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutan, A. M., Muradoglou, G., & Sudjana, B. G. (2012). IMF programs, nancial and real sector performance and the Asian crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahaye, J., Laurent, S., & Neely, C. J. (2011). Jumps, cojumps, and macro announcements. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26, 893–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, H., & Rendleman, R. (1976). Standard deviation of stock price ratios implied in option prices. Journal of Finance, 31, 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. S. (2012). Jumps and information flow in financial markets. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 439–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. S., & Mykland, P. A. (2008). Jumps in financial markets: A new nonparametric test and jump dynamics. Review of Financial Studies, 21(6), 2535–2563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. Y., Patton, A. J., & Sheppard, K. (2015). Does anything beat 5-minute RV? A comparison of realized measures across multiple asset classes. Journal of Econometrics, 187, 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, L., Ranaldo, A., & Wrampelmeyer, J. (2013). Liquidity in the foreign exchange market: Measurement, commonality, and risk premiums. Journal of Finance, 68, 1805–1841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., Musayev, T., Pinto, H., & Tang, L. (2012). Impact of news announcements on the FX implied volatility. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22, 719–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, M., & Taylor, M. P. (2009). The crisis in the foreign exchange rate market. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(8), 1317–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1980). On estimating the expected return on the market: An explanatory investigation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 323–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, M., & de Haan, J. (2013). Contagion during the Greek sovereign debt crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 34, 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omrane, W. B., & Savaser, T. (2016). The sign switch effect of macroeconomic news in foreign exchange markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 45, 96–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, A. J. (2011). Data-based ranking of realized volatility estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 161(2), 284–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccotti, L. R. (2018). Jumps, cojumps, and efficiency in the spot foreign exchange market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 87, 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picotti, L. R. (2016). Pricing errors and the geography of trade in the foreign exchange market. Journal of Financial Markets, 28, 46–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolskij, M., & Vetter, M. (2009). Bipower-type estimation in a noisy diffusion setting. Stochastic Processes and Applications, 119(9), 2803–2831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samitas, A., & Tsakalos, I. (2013). How can a small country affect the European economy? The Greek contagion phenomenon. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 25, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. S. (1997). The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 923–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. W. (1989). Why does stock market volatility change over time? Journal of Finance, 44, 1115–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. W. (1990a). Stock market volatility. Financial Analysts Journal, 46, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. W. (1990b). Stock volatility and the crash of 87. Review of Financial Studies, 3, 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. W., & Seguin, P. J. (1991). Heteroskedasticity in stock returns. Journal of Finance, 45, 1129–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensoy, A., Nguyen, D. K., Rostom, A., & Hacihasanoglu, E. (2018). Dynamic integration and network structure of the EMU sovereign bond markets. Annals of Operations Research, 1, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z., Hamill, P. A., Li, Y., Yang, Y. C., & Vigne, S. A. (2018). Did long-memory of liquidity signal the European sovereign debt crisis? Annals of Operations Research, 1, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E. T., & Williams, J. C. (2014). Measuring the effect of the zero lower bound on yields and exchange rates in the UK and Germany. Journal of International Economics, 92, 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. C. (2010). Does public financial news resolve asymmetric information? Review of Financial Studies, 23, 3520–3557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomakos, D. D., & Koubouros, M. S. (2011). The role of realized volatility in the Athens stock exchange. Multinational Finance Journal, 15(1/2), 87–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, M. (2010). Limit theorems for bipower variation of semimartingales. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 120(1), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vortelinos, D., Gillas, K., & Floros, C. (2017). The impact of Greek economic news on European financial markets. Evidence from the European sovereign debt crisis. The Greek Debt Crisis: In Quest of Growth in Times of Austerity. Berlin: Springer (pp. 219–283).

  • Zhang, L., Mykland, P. A., & Ait-Sahalia, Y. (2005). A tale of two time scales: Determining integrated volatility with noisy high-frequency data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 100(472), 1394–1411.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, University of Patras, Patras, Greece

    Konstantinos Gkillas

  2. Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK

    Dimitrios Vortelinos

  3. Department of Accounting and Finance, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, 71004, Crete, Greece

    Christos Floros & Alexandros Garefalakis

  4. Department of Finance and Accounting, Technological Educational Institute of Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece

    Nikolaos Sariannidis

Authors
  1. Konstantinos Gkillas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitrios Vortelinos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christos Floros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandros Garefalakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nikolaos Sariannidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaos Sariannidis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gkillas, K., Vortelinos, D., Floros, C. et al. Greek sovereign crisis and European exchange rates: effects of news releases and their providers. Ann Oper Res 294, 515–536 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03199-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03199-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation